Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny) by ALLAMA GHULAM AHMAD PARWEZ translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


The question of Destiny (1) – be it religion or philosophy – is considered to be the most difficult, complex and unexplained. The great deal that has been written on this problem has not only been unable to solve it, but also it leaves one ever more confused. After having published Jahane-Farda (2) – the last volume of my  Ma’aareful Quran series (3) (the voluminous and extensive Lughatul Quran (4) and Mafhoomul-Quran (5) ) – I saw as having completed a large part of my sacred mission of promoting & publicizing the Quranic thought. I was looking forward to devoting the rest of my days to compiling & editing Tabweebul Quran.(6)  But, I noticed that nearly 90% of the queries received  to seek further explanation of the Quranic teachings dealt – directly or indirectly – with the problem of destiny. Such questions, nay objections, were mostly from the young. Briefly, they said that a religion which proclaims that Man’s destiny is pre-determined and unchangeable, cannot be an effective tool in a competitive life and world. Others, who had started pondering over the Quran, found several contradictions in it. For example, they said, it (the Quran) says that it is Man’s choice to pick the right or wrong path of life. Yet, at other places, it says Man has no choice in the matter since righteousness is given by Allah alone. Such queries and objections made me see as inadequate whatever I had already written on the subject. Since it is scattered in various books, I felt a special treatise was needed to answer this enigma. Otherwise, all my efforts to get the educated young interested in the Quran would be rendered futile. They could even grow distrustful of Din (7) (Islam). That has been the promoting force behind this treatise you have in your hands.

The Quran has clearly, and satisfactorily, explained this most complex problem like it has so eloquently, yet simply, dealt with other problems regarding human life and the universe. But, it requires a deep study of the Quran, for which one must consider the following:

1.    Normally, a book deals with one subject and is divided into chapters.  Each chapter deals with one particular aspect of the subject and is self-contained. All chapters chain the various aspects together to give a coherent view of the subject. The Quran has a different style. It deals – not with one subject – but with crucial problems of human existence and those of the universe at large. Obviously, a book of normal proportions, when dealing with such complex and numerous issues, just cannot discuss them in detail. Therefore, it has dealt in great detail, with the issues of human life but only touches upon the realities of the universe and human existence. It expects Man to discover the secrets of the universe. Also, the Quran does not deal with a topic fully at one time. Instead, it spreads it throughout the book through its method of repetition (tasreef-e-ayaat), – the principle, the explanation of it, illustration through examples, the exception(s) – all sprinkled all over. It is out of scope of the book you are reading to explain this particular style of the Quran and its aptness in its role of a complete and permanent eternal code of life for all mankind for ever to come. For the moment, it is suffice to state that the best approach to comprehend the Quran is to keep in view all the relevant verses throghout   the book about a particular question. Isolated verses do not, and cannot, present a true picture. That has been my own approach, and, on this very basis, after a life-long toil, have managed to compile my ‘Lughaatul Quran’ and ‘Mafhoomul Quran’. In this book, too, I have adopted the same technique.

2.    Another obstacle in the way of understanding the Quranic teaching is the traditional approach of translation. The fact of the matter is that the Quran cannot be translated into any language. This is true, though amazing. No other language has the vocabulary synonymous with the Quran. I have dealt with it in detail in the introductory chapter to ‘Mafhoomul Quran’. Those interested may well read it there to discover that the fact of the Quranic ‘untranslatability’  (being untranslatable) has been acknowledged by Muslim as well as non-Muslim scholars. The Quran can be interpreted but not translated. This very fact prompted me to author ‘Mafhoomul Quran’ which, thanks to Allah, has been very well received with a wide-spread voluntary acclaim that it has helped tremendously in comprehending the Quran.

In this book  I have quoted the Quranic verses (8) in the following manner: ‘this verse is traditionally translated like this, but its interpretation is …’ . This is not to say that the translation is erroneous. The question of err does not arise in an untranslatable situation. For example, verse 93, Sura (9) 16 is translated thus: “Allah misleads whosoever He wishes and guides whosoever He wishes.”  The same mode of translation can be found in all publications – even when it is translated into Arabic! Nonetheless, a careful look, in the light of the principle of ‘tasreef-e-ayat’ mentioned above, reveals that this translation conveys an erroneous – rather opposing – view of the Quranic teachings in this regard. Therefore, “  من يشاء “ must be correctly interpreted in view of various Quranic verses in this connection before this particular verse can be understood. This is the approach I have taken – interpreting the Quranic vocabulary through Quranic verses on the basis of recognized Arabic lexicon   – in interpreting the entire Quran in ‘Mafhoomul Quran’. I have made use of this technique in this book, too.

In regards to understanding the Quran, one must keep in view the point that the Quran’s claim of being divine is supported by, among others, the fact that it contains no self-contradiction at all (verse 4, Sure 82). Therefore, an interpretation of a verse cannot be correct if it is contradictory to another. One must be mindful of this while reading the Quran. This is exactly what I have done. The Quran has no contradictory statements. If one is noticed, the fault lies not with the book but with the reader. Such confusion can be removed by deeper consideration, spurred by curiosity.

4.    One more fundamental requirement is for the reader to shed off all the pre-conceived concepts and beliefs before reading the Quran. Otherwise, you may psychologically look for evidence in support of your views. This will render comprehending the Quran impossible. This is why the Quran puts the condition of “ لااله “ before “ الا الله “., i.e., to ‘get to Allah’ one must clear one’s mind of all ‘non-Allah’ concepts. Allah will not enter the Kaaba unless it is cleared of idols. (10)  This is really hard to do but there is no other way to comprehending the Quran.

I have also stated in this book thus: “When ‘Din’ changes to Religion (مذهب )…. (11) ”. The difference between the two must be made clear. ‘ Ad Deen’ is the code of life handed down from God to mankind through his messengers by means of the process of revelation. This obliterates into ‘mazhab’ (religion) by human alterations. Religion, though devised by man, is attributed to God. Common man is thus hoodwinked into their submission by the religious priesthood. When a voice of dissent is raised against a covenant of ( religious ) faith, the priests whip up popular opinion against it by accusations of digression from the established norms of the earlier generations (the respected forefathers). Thus, they make sure that that voice is muted. Their efforts succeed with help from the fact that religious beliefs, however wrong, are one’s most precious possession and are extremely hard to part with.

Islam, too, has gone through this process. The ‘Deen’  had been given to man by God through the Messenger. Soon after, it was infiltrated by human concepts and beliefs, gradually descending to the level of religion. That very religion is our current ideology. But there is one basic difference between us (Muslims) and other religions. That very difference has the potential of reconverting religion into ‘Ad-Deen’. That fundamental difference is that we have the Book of God. It contains ‘Ad-Deen’ in its original and un-obliterated form. This situation is unique to Islam. Today the Quran is the only original divine book under the sun. (12)  Therefore, should we wish to transform our current religion into ‘Ad-Deen’, we have to weigh and test our current religious beliefs and practices against the Quran – keeping those which agree with it and discarding the ones which don’t. The whole point of my efforts is to bring back to light the divine ‘Ad-Deen’. Hence this book is a very important link in a long chain of my publications. It shows that one of the fundamental causes of our downfall through history is the non-Quranic belief of Destiny. This is an anti-Deen and illogical belief which has reduced a lively people to a mere heap of dust. I request the reader to ponder deeply over my presentations. This is highly desirable as the current concept of the problem of Destiny has been with us for centuries and has become an article of faith. To replace it with the correct Quranic concept one needs deep pondering as well as exemplary patience and rare perseverance.

This book is intended for those who wish to understand the problem of Destiny through the Quran. Hence, it contains no philosophic or linguistic discussions. I have tried to explain one of the most complex problems in a simple way, through the Quran. Also, I have tried to keep its style as simple as possible, though it is difficult to change one’s writing style, especially during one’s twilight years. The extent of my success can only be judged by the reader.

The Quranic verses have been referred to by the verse number above the Sura (chapter) number. For Example, 3/15 means: the fifteenth verse of the 3rd Sura (Aal-e-Imraan). If you don’t find a particular verse printed here, please look it up in a copy of the Quran – keeping in mind that numbering of a particular verse may differ from one copy of the Quran to another.

Finally, I must state (as I always do) that this presentation is the result of human deliberations to comprehend the Quran. As such, it may not be perfect. I have presented, to the best of my faculties, what I have come to conclude as true and correct. I will consider myself successful if you agree with it. Otherwise, you are free to deliberate over the Quran yourself. I, as a rule, avoid argumentation. I will consider myself duly rewarded if my efforts succeed to reveal the Quran in its true light, even to a single reader.

(1)    Refers to the age-old debate on whether events in the human world are pre-determined or not by a super-human being.
(2)     Literally, Persian for ‘Tomorrow’s World’ – a treatise on the Hereafter (Life after death).
(3)     A series of books explaining the teachings of the Quran on the origin of the universe as well as that of Man; also the Quran’s versions of the life-stories    and teachings of prophets like Abraham, Moses, Christ & Mohammad.
(4)     A dictionary of the Quranic vocabulary.
(5)     A paraphrasing of the meanings of the Quran.
(6)     Classification of the Quranic verses under topics.
(7)     ‘Ad-Deen’ (الدين ) in Arabic is referred to the entire socio-politico-economic – and beyond system the Quran proposed for mankind. The author prefers this term for referring to ‘ISLAM’ against the popularly used ‘Mazhab’ (مذهب ) which he contends refers to a shallow & superficial representation of only a part of ‘Ad-Deen’
(8)     A ‘verse’ is one unit of speech (not necessarily a complete sentence in the English sense)     ending with a circular mark (o)
(9)     A ‘Sura’ is one chapter of the Quran (there are 114 in all).
(10)   Refers to the historical event of the Kaaba (the cubical structure in the courtyard of the Grand Mosque in Makkah, Saudi Arabia) cleared of all idols when Prophet Mohammad triumphantly entered Makkah to reclaim the Kaaba to monotheism.
(11)   See (7)
(12) Today the books universally acknowledged and accepted as divine are: The Bible (containing the old testament – especially The Torah of Moses –  the New Testament and the Psalms of David) and the Quran. It has been universally established and accepted that the Quran still exists – unchanged – exactly in the form as given by Mohammad.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


Man was born into a hostile environment – awesome forests full of terrifying wild killer-beasts and other fearsome gigantic animals; towering mountains with their looming rocks; limitless seas with their shocking storms; tumultous rivers and streams with their destructive floods; endless rains, snowfalls with petrifying thunder and lightning; awesome volcanoes with their fiery produce; earthquakes. All these destructive forces surrounded a vulnerable mankind who did not understand, and could not defend itself against, all these forces. Man was still unaware of the natural law of cause and effect and was ignorant of the possibility of harnessing these forces. Therefore, every destructive event was seen as an accident, happening by chance. That was the limit of human thought. Logically, a helpless, vulnerable, ignorant and poor creature in such environment saw itself as a captive of destiny. That, then, is Man’s first ever view of himself.

A weak, defenseless and vulnerable man has only one way to react to an awesome and dangerous element — to submit & plead to it for mercy. This is what the early Man did. He bowed in submission to that huge fiery ball rising from the east every morning. He cowered down in front of thunder and lightning. Terrified by the overflowing river waters, he pleaded to it for respite. The lion, the snake and fire and rain became his idols. This gave birth to another belief, i.e. he must request a powerful force for help against dangers. Anthropologists refer it to as the Age of Worship.

Clearly, this human belief could not affect Nature which was bound by laws. Occasionally though, when their prayers were answered — purely by chance — they would grow firmer in their beliefs. Otherwise believing in their own helplessness, they would accept the situation as a matter of course.

The relatively more intelligent ones among them began exploiting this sense of helplessness by suggesting particular procedures of worship. This was the birth of the Age of Magic — the practices of magic, sorcery, charming, occultism etc. Incidentally, this gave Man a little sense of his own power, i.e. he can, to some extent, control the forces of Nature. Still, his basic concept of his helplessness did not change. Man of this age did not possess the divine guidance of ‘Wahi’ and consequently, formulated his own ideas and concepts about his own self and the universe around him. Such concepts were later on referred to as RELIGION, and are commonly found in all religions, old and new alike. The basis of religion is the same all over the world.

Contrary to this, ‘Wahi’ (1) handed down its version of the concepts of universe, man and super-nature. They are:

The universe is not a result of, neither operates by, chance. It has been planned and purposefully created by an intelligent Being, and operates according to firm and permanent laws of Nature formulated by Him. The Being is refereed to as ‘Allah’. His laws are applicable to the physical universe as well as Man’s social life, both individual and collective. Nothing is outside the sphere of these laws.

Everything in the universe, with the exception of Man, must  — and does — obey the laws of Nature. This is known as the ‘nature of things’. This ‘nature’ can not be altered. Therefore, every event in the universe takes place within the bounds of these laws. It is known as the ‘the Law of Cause and Effect’ in general, and ‘the Law of Result of Actions’ in particular reference to the human world, i.e., each and every act by Man — even his thoughts — produces a result.

Man has been created with the potentiality of discovering the laws of Nature, which enables him to harness the natural forces. Thus, the whole universe is bound but Man is not. He should not be scared of the universe. On the contrary, the universe should be ‘scared’ of Man. The universe is conquerable and controllable by Man.

Laws of Nature can be discovered by observation, study and experience. In today’s lexicon, it is known as ‘the Sciences’. But, knowledge of the laws for Man’s own life (the human side of it, not the physical) has been given to him through ‘Wahi’, preserved for ever in the Quran. These ‘human’ laws are also permanent and firm just like the rest of the laws of Nature.

The basic difference between Man and the rest of creation is that the universe is forced and bound to follow the laws of Nature while Man is not. He is free to choose — either to live by these or any others laws.

Man is free to choose the laws he wishes to live by. But he must bear the consequences of his choice. For instance, one is free to consume poison as well as sugar, but the natural effect of one cannot be replaced by that of the other. That is beyond Man. This state of the Laws of Nature is applicable to Man’s earthly life as well as the Hereafter.

Allah is the Absolute Power that formulated, and now exercises perfect control over, these laws. Any law — the formula of ‘if this happens, that will happen’ — is next to nothing without the enforcing authority behind it. Permanence of a law as a living reality requires the implementing authority to be living and permanent ( Hayyei (حي) and Qayyoum (قيوم) in the Quran’s words).

The concepts just mentioned form the basis of a code of life known as ‘Ad-Deen’. This stands in obvious contrast as a challenge  to Religion. The Quran elaborates these concepts in great detail. This, then, is the subject of this book which aims at explaining clearly the question of Destiny (Fate) which Religion has rendered so complicated.

(1) ‘Wahi’ is the Quranic term for divine messages from God (Allah) to His Messengers. Literally, it means a sharp, quiet and subtle signal.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


Allah has always been and will always be. He was Allah even before this Universe was created, He will  be Allah even when this Universe exists no more. Therefore, ‘Allah’s domain’ is not only the created universe but also beyond. This is what the Quran refers to as the two worlds of Allah – Amr and Khalq. Khalq is the created universe while Amr is whatever is beyond. (7/54)

Law pertains to the world of Khalq. Two examples are, the universal truths of ‘Cause & Effect’, and any creation being dependent on its constituent material. Amr relates to creation from nothingness. His determination to create from nothingness and His actions thereof run contrary to natural laws like cause and effect, creation within the universe, procreation, etc. Amr is based upon ‘Allah’s will’. (22/14, 11/107, 5/1, 22/18, 21/31). See 2/117 (below), also 6/14 and 30/11.

Takhleeq – ‘Khalaqun’ literally means to measure, to assess the balance and ratio of things. Thus ‘Khalaq’ means to make something with the right balance and ratio of elements according to a specific measure. The domain of ‘Amr’ (creating from nothingness) is exclusive to Allah and Allah alone. Material resulting from ‘Amr’ may be, and is, used in various proportions to create by Nature as well as Man. Allah is the best creator in this particular sense (Khalq – 23/14, 37/125). He also improvises (35/1), either by creating something for the first time (‘Abdaa’) or varying an existing formula. GHALIB put it aptly …. (1)  Also, IQBAL:  (2)

Characteristics of the Domain of Amr: This is the initial stage of creation. The chemistry of it all is beyond human comprehension and consequently, unquestionable. Allah used His exclusive power and privileges to create things (from nothingness) giving them their particular characteristics (24/45). He simply exercised His ‘will’. Man is told that the universe was created ‘rightfully’ (16/30) not wrongfully (3/19). It is upto Man to delve into the mechanics of it all to arrive at the ‘rightness’ of the universe around him. Suffice to say that the reality and function of the Domain of Amr lies outside the extents of human comprehension and its concept of ‘cause & effect’.

Having created the universe according to His own will, Allah introduced a great change in this cosmic program. Now, He bound His Amr in LAWS. This demands intense ponderance.


The Arabic word ‘QANOON (قانون) (3) has not been used in the Quran in the meaning of LAW. It seldom appears even in contemporary Arabic literature. Instead, the Quran has employed a root more comprehensive than QANOON. It is Q-D-R with the basic meaning of a measure. (قدرت الشيء) means: I measured that thing; estimated. (قدرت الشيء بالشيء) means: I measured the (one) thing against the (other) thing. (قدرت عليه الثوب) means: I made clothes for him according to measurements. Therefore, ‘taqdeer’ has the sense of something being fit to measurements. (مقدار) is a model standard or measure. (على قدر) means: He/It proved true to measure (expected standard). (قدار) is a person of reasonable average of height. (المقدر) is a person who forecasts the yield possible from a particular corn field.

It follows, therefore, that (قدر) ‘Qadrun’ or (تقدير) ‘Taqdeer’ means a measure or a standard; also, of something to be of the right measurements, standard and estimate.

Since absolute control is required to make something according to a particular standard, (قدرت على شيء) means: I had control (and power) to make that thing according to my standard/measure.

Allah’s ‘AMR’ Bound to Laws

It has been stated that the ‘Domain of ‘Amr’ functions under the absolute power and will of Allah. There are no binding laws. In the ‘Domain of ‘Khalq’, however, Allah’s will is bound by laws (33/38: Allah’s ‘amr’ was bound by standards & measures) and thus ‘Allah set a standard to everything’ (65/3)

This needs illustration. Liquid water is transformed to solid at freezing point and reverses at a particular temperature. It flows downhill and adapts its form to the container it is in. High temperature evaporates water into vapor which, being lighter than air, rise up as clouds. At a set temperature, clouds liquefy back into water, which, being heavier than air, falls down as rain. These facts are the ‘measures / standards of water’. Another example of the ‘standards of water’ is that in the right quantity, it is a thirst-quenching and life-giving commodity whereas in larger quantities it can even kill (e.g., drowning). A date tree yields fruit in years but banana takes only a few months. A cactus seed breeds a thorny, fruitless plant whereas a mango seed yields an exotic fruit.

Laws of Nature

It is not difficult to see, then,  that (قدر) ‘Qadr’ of the

Quran is nothing but the Laws of Nature. Therefore, 65/3 means: Allah has set standards / measures to everything in the universe. These laws govern the creation, growth and death (or transformation) of all things. Consider the following from the Quran:

1.         Regarding the birth of a human child, it says that it starts with the semen being deposited in a safe place (the female ovum) and  in (77/21, 22) it stays there for a known measure. Obviously, this refers to the period a fetus stays in the mother’s womb. (according to Nature’s law). The Quran goes on to say in 77/23 “ these measures have been set by Us and We are the best of standard setters”. Incidentally, this verse illustrates the meaning of (قادر ) i.e., the one who sets standards. A variation of this word (قادر) has been used as (قدير) in (25/54).

About the fetus it says elsewhere (13/8) that occasionally a fetus cannot achieve its full and complete growth and that Gad has set standards to all things.

2.         About rain the Quran says (in 43/11, 23/18): “and We bring down rain from clouds according to a measure”. Elsewhere (13/17), it says: “after rains, streams flow according to their standards.”

3.         Produce from the Earth is mentioned in (42/27): “Its produce is according to a measure set by Allah’s will. (ما يشاء  is explained a little further on in this book). The four seasons for harvesting & farming are mentioned in (41/10): “Allah has set standards for four harvests (of the Earth).”

4.         Summing up, it says about all universe in (25/2)  “He created all things and set a measure to them.”. More precisely in (54/49): “Surely, We created everything according to a measure.”  Special attention should be paid to two verses from Sura ‘Al-Aala’: “Allah initiated all creation, then gave everything a suitable proportion, set standards to them and programmed them for growth according to those measures.”

5.         Let us now look at references where (قدر) is even more clearly used in today’s sense of ‘Laws of Nature’. Even a school child knows about the Earth’s rotation causing day and night according to set laws. This enables us to forecast, with certain precision, sunrise and sunset. The Quran says in (73/20): “Allah has set standards to day & night.” Also, about the moon (10/5): “Allah has set stages for it.”

The meaning of (تقدير) may be very clear by the following: “The sun is traveling towards its station. This is the measure set by the all-knowing and almighty (Allah).” Elsewhere (41/12), it talks about the heavenly bodies in general, and about stars in particular, and then says, “These are the standards set by the all-powerful and all-knowing (Allah)”.

This illustrates then, that (تقدير) means Laws of Nature and NOT Man’s destiny.

One may ponder here on the point that the above mentioned verses say ‘Allah’s taqdeer’ (standards set by Allah). Therefore, it will be factually erroneous to say ‘Man’s taqdeer’ because Man has not (and cannot) set standards to the universe.

The truth of the matter is that so many of our problems arise because of our misuse of words and their meanings. The only way to comprehending the Quran is to ascertain the correct meanings of its vocabulary, terminology and concepts.

These taqadeer (standards, measures – law of Nature) of Allah’s are pre-determined (it was done in the domain of ‘Amr’) and they are ‘written’ in the ‘book of Nature / Universe’. This is referred to as ‘the clearly set book’. It says in Sura An’aam: “Allah knows what is in the seas and on land. He knows every leaf that falls off a tree. He also knows even a grain in the darkness of the Earth. The truth is that each and every thing (in detail) is there in the clearly-set book.” (6/59) That is to say that standards have been set to all things in the universe and are there. (17/58) ((for anyone to read if they so wish)). This is physics (science). That is why these laws are called (بقدر معلوم) in (15/21) and (15/24) i.e., laws which can be discovered. Adam (mankind) is said to have been given ‘the knowledge of names’. This is nothing but the knowledge of the universe.
Laws of Nature are Permanent

Law is defined as: If………. then ………… always

A ‘law’ is different from an ‘order’:  ‘Law’ is based upon its consistency (if you do this, that will ALWAYS happen). ‘Order’ is a decision. A master issues a variety of orders to his servants. One order may differ in kind from the previous one. Therefore, ‘orders’ are decisions which are subject to change. But when an order (decision) becomes consistent (with no possibility of change), it becomes law (unchangeable decision). Allah’s decisions about the universe (standards and measures) are unchangeable. The permanence of laws of Nature provides the foundation for the sciences. This ever-reliable foundation of permanent laws enables (‘tawakkal’ in the Quranic terminology) the earthlings to take successful trips to the Moon. In fact, the entire structure of our wonderful universe stands on the permanence, consistency and reliability of the laws of Nature.

Allah’s Word (كلمة الله) and Allah’s Way (سنة الله):

Both of these

expressions in the Quran have been used  to mean Allah’s law. ‘Kalima’ is the formula (theory) while ‘SunnatAllah’ is the practical form the ‘Kalimatullah’ takes. Both of these are permanent: (6/34, 6/116, 18/27 and also 10/64) for ‘Kalimatullah’ and (33/62, 40/85, 48/23) for ‘SunnatAllah’. Not only are these laws permanent but they don’t even change course (17/77, 35/43)! It has been mentioned above that Allah’s ‘Amr (will) becomes (قدرا مقدورا) ‘set standards & measures’ in the created universe. This is referred to as ‘SunnatAllah’ in (33/38), i.e., it becomes unchangeable law.


We have also said earlier that according to the Quran Allah has

created the universe with ‘Haq’ (productive, beneficial and realizable results). This purpose of the universe is mentioned in (10/82): ‘Allah proves the validity of ‘Haq’ through His laws’, and also in (42/24): ‘Allah, through His laws, removes ‘Baatel’ (the wrong) and establishes ‘Haq’ (the right).” This phenomenon (realization of beneficial & productive results through His laws) naturally requires eons (33/5, 70/4). But their pace can be wondrously quickened if Man joins in the action by studying the physical laws of Nature and adopting Allah’s laws for human society – (see ‘Islam Kya Hai?’ (What is Islam?) or ‘Islam: A challenge to Religion’ by the same author for a detailed treatment of this point) The Quran says in (65/3): ‘Surely, Allah sees to it that His Amr (Will) is realized. That was the purpose of establishing standards & measures for all things.

The created universe has no freedom of choice: Since Laws of Nature are permanent, the universe has to follow them anyway. All things in the universe do that faithfully (please see: 16/49, 2/116 and 57/1).

Let me give you a summary of what has been said so far:

1.         Allah has formulated and established laws for all things in the universe, exercising absolute control.

2.       The universe is bound to follow the laws of Nature.

3.       These laws are discoverable (قدر معلوم) by Man (2/34). The Quran summarizes this in (45/13): “Allah has made the entire universe conquerable (you can harness it). There are clear signs in this for those who care to think”.

Allah bound Himself!

We have seen a great change in Allah’s great

design of things; i.e., His ‘Amr – absolute power and choice – transformed to building permanent Law of Nature. In other words, Allah bound Himself! Shocking, isn’t it? But, it IS true. We witness it routinely. For example, see (6/12 & 6/54) where He says: ‘He has made Rahma compulsory for Himself. (4) Also, see (10/103): ‘We have the obligation to protect the convinced. (5) This has also been termed as ‘Allahs Promise’ in (16/38, 31/9, 31/33, 35/5, 40/55 & 40/77). Also to be noted is the declaration that He always does, and will, keep His promise (30/6, 3/193).

Allah’s Promises

His promises are nothing but His laws and ‘keeping

promises’ means the laws are permanent and consistent. The Quran contains a significant example of Allah’s voluntary adherence to His own Laws. One of nature’s Laws is procreation of animals and humans through the mating of a male and a female. The Quran rejects the Christian belief of the virgin birth (Christ being son of Allah) with a wonderfully logical argument. It says that despite  being the absolutely free and all-powerful initiator and originator of the universe, He bound it and Himself in laws. The law requires a male and female for procreation. How can anyone be Allah’s son when He has no wife? (6/102). In other words, He would have broken His own law by getting Himself a son, but He did not!

A criticism Answered

This gives rise to the argument that a ‘law

abiding Allah’ ceases to be the ‘all-powerful Allah’. But this is misleading. One does not cease to have power if one submits to a law voluntarily. For instance, if you are made to, against your will, have a daily 3- mile early morning walk, you are forced. But if you decide to do it, on your own accord, you are free. One who keeps promises and adopts certain principles in life, is not powerless. On the contrary, such a person is termed a man of honor, upholder of principles and reliable. Therefore, Allah doesn’t lose any power by binding himself in His own Laws. In fact, such a Allah is worthy of being Allah. He is a Allah who can be trusted because His laws are reliable. Despite having the power to do so, He doesn’t break laws. This concept of Allah comes from ‘Din’.

Religion’s Concept of Allah

The  religionists  cannot  or  will  not

accept this. The Allah of Religion as mentioned earlier, is a remnant of the early days of  Man’s intellectual growth. Now, Man has come of age and the Allah of ‘Din’ can be appreciated. But, sadly, the religionists don’t want this concept to get popular as it threatens their privileged position of ‘mediators’ between Man and Allah. This allows them to exercise authority over people. For this very purpose, the clergy propagated the concept of autocracy and hereditary monarchy. They likened kings to Allah where both are bound by no law. People under the influence of such clergy and monarchy can only follow instructions, not observe any laws. Such is the religion’s grip on the human mind that even mutineers and freedom fighters like to see Allah as an absolute ruler, much in the mold of an earthly king! This dualism (to have a law-abiding human society and a lawless Allah) is the hallmark of religion. ‘Ad-Din’ wants to replace it with the monotheism of a law-abiding Allah and an equally law-abiding Man!.


Ghalib: Using the simile of a veiled lady who is using a mirror to make her face up, Ghalib refers to the Creator who goes on to beautify the universe.

Iqbal: The same idea is presented using a different simile of a hitherto not fully untapped plant of wine-bearing juice.

The Arabic word (قانون ) ‘Qanoon’ is commonly understood and translated into Urdu as ‘law’. Note that this work was originally intended for an Urdu readership.

The Arabic work ‘Kataba’ literally means to write (here ‘has written or wrote). Since writing makes something permanent, it is used to refer to a permanent decision (law). This is supported by the well known verse about fasting 2/183.

The Arabic word (مؤمن) “mo’min” is popularly translated into English as ‘believer’ which, to the  author, is not a true representation. Even ‘faithful’ does not carry over the meaning of mo’min. This very important word springs from the root a-m-n having the basic concept of peace of mind and heart resulting from being totally convinced of something because of rational knowledge. Hence the translation of mo’mineen as ‘the convinced’.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


It has been stated that, in the second phase of Allah’s creation schedule, His Amr became Law and the universe was created bound to follow it. Also, Allah Himself vowed to keep the LAW constant. This was a big leap in the creation schedule. Now, even a bigger leap came, That was creation of Man. Laws were established for Man, too, but he was not bound to follow them. He was given the freedom of ignoring them. Thus:

i)          An omnipotent Creator bounds Himself to His own laws,
ii)         The Universe is bound to follow His laws
iii)        Man is NOT bound to follow His laws.

Man’s Will and Choice:

Man has the freedom of choice – as opposed to the rest of the Universe which is bound and forced to obey Nature’s laws. The Quran says in (90/10): “ And We showed him two paths”. Also, (in 76/3): “We have guided him to the right path. It is upto him now to accept or reject it.” It is further elaborated in 18/29: “Tell that Right (has arrived) from your Preserver. It is upto you now to accept or reject it”. In Sura An.Najm, it says (53/39): Man can only get what he strives for.” Endeavor springs from Man’s will. Therefore, this point has been made several times in the

Quran. In Sura Bani Israel (17/18-20), it says: “Whoever endeavors to achieve the short-term benefits, get them, and We give the bounties of  Future to whoever decides and strives for them. This is a universe of endeavor and We have not sealed our bounties closed.” Also, in 4/134: “Whoever decides to get short-term benefits (should know that) Allah has both short-term and long-term benefits. You’ll get whatever you work for” (Also in 25/62).

Man’s Responsibility

As shall be elaborated in the next chapter, ‘Return of Deeds’, Man is created responsible for all his actions which consequently bear results. The entire system of Reward & Punishment rests on Man’s being responsible for his actions. Responsibility has to come from freedom of choice. No freedom of choice, no responsibility. That’s why the Quran says (in 16/75-76) “The subjugated and the free can never be equal. Subsequently, one will be answerable only for actions committed out of free will (16/106). Also (in 33/5): “you won’t be held answerable for (an unintentional) mistake – only for one which you make with your heart’s intention”. The same principle lies under the normal judicial law which distinguishes between intentional (cold-blooded) and unintentional (warm-blooded or accidental) murder, proposing  different punishments for them (4/92-93).

Story of Man – Free Will and Enforcement

The Quran has resolved the problem of Freedom & Compulsion through the figurative story of Man. Both Man and Iblis (Devil) were given a command each. Both sinned (disobeyed the command). When Adam (Man) was  asked to explain; he responded with a regretful “O our Allah, we have done ourselves harm” (7/23). That is, Adam, by regreting and confessing to the disobedience, admitted the responsibility for the action. This gave him a chance of redemption.  He was told not to worry (in 2/38): “ I will be giving guidance to you. Whoever follows it will become free of fear and grief”. This is the potential of regaining the lost Paradise. The Quran calls it ‘repentance to reform after having erred’ (16/119).

On the contrary, Iblis responded by blaming Allah for his action, citing his own lack of free will (7/16 and 15/39). Because he did not assume responsibility, Iblis had no chances of reform (15/34) and was reviled (7/18). He was ‘destined’ to eternal frustration (Iblis literally means frustrated). One who considers himself bound cannot improve his lot and remains frustrated for ever.

The Way of Infidels and Polytheists

The Quran says that the Devilish (Iblis) attitude of “I would not have sinned if You (Allah) had not wished so” is the line always taken by infidels and polytheists. They attribute their way of life to Allah’s will — ‘we are what we are because Allah wills so’. As it is said in Sura An’aam: “When you question their (erroneous) way of life, the polytheists will say – ‘It is Allah’s will that we are, and our ancestors were, polytheists” (6/149). Allah rebuts that statement with: “Whatever you say (and follow) is nothing but pure conjecture (and ignorance)”. In Sura Zakhraf, it says that when you (the Prophet) question them, they say: ‘We would never have prayed to these idols if God did not will it”. Allah said, “this is just ignorance. They are nothing but conjectures.” (43/20). Sura Yaseen reports that when the rich are asked to let their wealth flown down to the poor, the infidels reply: ‘How can we enrich those who are poor by Allah’s will?”. The Quran’s response to that is : “surely, you are in grave ignorance!” (36/47).

Allah’s Will

Please pause here for a moment and think about our routine utterances like: ‘This is what Allah wanted’, or ‘It would never have happened if He didn’t want it’, or ‘Whatever takes place in this world is according to Allah’s will. Man cannot intervene in it. In fact, one who recites phrases like ‘Allah’s will is paramount’ and poetry like ‘Please don’t pray for my well-being as it may be against Allah’s will (by Hasrat Mohaany)’ is considered to be most Allah-loving. Please think what the Quran says about this attitude. I am confident of the powers of my reader’s intellect. Therefore, I leave it to you to ponder over.

Man’s Will in Man’s World

The Quran states that the infidels and polytheists (following Iblis) say that God’s will controls all events in Man’s world. But Allah says to men: “Do whatever you will” (41/40).

Restricted in choice  But this (41/40) goes further. It says: “Do whatever you wish. Surely, whatever you do (will bear a result, as it) is watched by Him”. That is: your are free to do whatever you wish but not free to alter the natural result of that action. You can’t follow path A and expect to end up at the other end of path B. (or you can’t swallow a pinch of poison and expect it to behave like a lump of sugar. Every action has a set reaction. You can initiate and trigger a law which then follows its natural course.

Actions and Results

This is illustrated in the Quran at various places – Sura Bani Israel says: “When they disgraced, Allah (‘s Law of Return of Deeds) twisted their hearts,” (61/5). They (the children of Israel) were told that if they followed the last messenger of Allah, they would be absolved of their miserable life, but: ‘ If you return (to your previous attitude), We will (also) return (to giving you the same miserable life once again) (17/8). Allah’s law is: “Whoever turns away (from Him), is turned  away” (51/9). Sura Tauba reports: “When they turned away, Allah turned their hearts away” (9/127). Sura An-Nisa reports that whoever chooses to turn to other than the Prophet & the convinced, “We group them together”. (4/115). Contrarily, you remember Me, I remember you” (2/152), and “You help Me, I help you” (47/7).

This has so beautifully represented by Iqbal as:


State of Nations

The Quran also tells us that the Law affecting individuals is also applicable to nations (groups of people) to bring about a change in their ‘destiny’. That means that a nation can alter its state according to the change it brings about in its psyche (13/11 and 8/53). In other words, just like individuals, nations are also bound by Allah’s laws of their rise and fall, revival and extinction i.e., whatever a nation does, it produces a result pre-determined by the eternal laws of Nature. This point shall be elaborated in chapter six dealing with rise and fall of nations.

Further explanation of the term ‘Taqdeer’

Please recall what has been said so far about the meaning of the term ‘taqdeer’. As reminder, Sura An’aam reports: “Allah made night for rest and the sun and the moon for calculation (of time). This the taqdeer (destiny) of the Powerful and Knowledgeable Allah,” 6/97). In other words, this is Allah’s law. Similarly, Sura Yaseen reports: “And the sun is on course to its station. This the Powerful and Knowledgeable Allah’s taqdeer,” (36/38). Elsewhere, it says: “And We decorated the world’s sky with bright lamps (stars), and provided you protection through them. This the Powerful and Knowledgeable Allah’s taqdeer,” (41/12). Sura Furqaan reports: “He created all things and then determined taqdeer for them,” (25/2). Obviously, taqdeer means Nature’s laws. Again, Sura AdDahr reports: These goblets will be made of (brilliant) silver and made to special taqdeer (measures),” (76/16).

It should be evident by now that the term ‘taqdeer’  means measures, standards, or laws of Nature running the Universe. Clearly, this is in stark contradiction to the interpretation of the term (under use in Urdu) in the sub-continent of India & Pakistan, viz-a-viz Man’s taqdeer (destiny). Taqdeer, in the Quranic sense, is nothing but Allah’s laws. Therefore, as far as Man is concerned, we say that:

Taqdeer (destiny) is Nature’s law which becomes functional according to the action taken by Man.

For instance, the ‘taqdeer’ of a person who puts a hand in fire is burning. When that burn is treated with a balm, soothing becomes its taqdeer. Iqbal represented it thus:

Omar Farooq’s Illustration

This point is illustrated by a story about Omar (the Second Caliph). When plague broke out, he suggested moving out of the town to a nearby forest. Abu Obaida commented, “You are trying to escape Allah’s law?”. “Yes”, Omar replied, “I am escaping from His (one) law to His (other) law,”. If one stays in a plague-infected area, death comes according to God’s taqdeer (law). But, if one leaves the epidemic-affected environment for cleaner, safer ground, death is avoided according to Allah’s ‘taqdeer’ (law). The choice between the two ‘taqdeers (laws) is entirely Man’s own. Iqbal says:


Therefore, the strong-willed choose their actions in the light of their ‘taqdeer’ (pre-determined results) but the weak become subject to changes in their situation – they are just like vegetation. That, then, is the Quranic meaning of taqdeer.

How did this all change?

A little further in the book, I shall deal with the problem of this shift in view when I shall elaborate upon the causes of the Quranic System (Din) obliterating into Religion (Mazhab). This shift changed the law-enforcing Allah into an absolute dictator and the free-willed Man became a prisoner of ‘taqdeer’. The religious leaders (priests) assumed the guardianship of the jail!.

Belief of Enforcement

The supporters of ‘Mazhab’ (as against ‘Din’) seek to substantiate their views of Enforcement (a bound Man as against free-willed) with certain Quranic verses. Before I deal with it at length later on in the book, I shall now briefly present the argument in principle. They present verses like: “Not a person knows what he (or she) will do tomorrow…” (31/34), and “No one knows the location of one’s death”… (18/24); also, Allah says about Himself: “He knows about their (of people) present and future” (2/255). The conclusion drawn from all this is: If Man is free-willed, it shouldn’t be difficult for him to determine what he will do tomorrow. This verse can hold good only if Man is bound.

This argument has a basic flaw. Man is surely free-willed. But, his freedom is not limitless. It is dependent on various factors beyond his control and/or knowledge. He does not have complete control over his environment and, more importantly so, neither over his fellow men’s actions. Man can be more certain about the physical universe around him when and if his knowledge of it progresses, but he cannot be certain of other (free-willed) men’s actions. In toady’s world, the political change in a super-power (country like the US), affects the entire globe. Therefore, Man, unlike the Sun or the Moon, cannot foretell with certainty the actions he will take in future. Man can only decide his actions in the light of his situation, considering the various factors in play, only upto a point within the boundaries of human capabilities.

Another part of the argument is Allah’s  knowledge of people’s future as well as present. It is erroneously concluded that Allah can know Man’s future only if the future is pre-determined – future of a free-willed creation cannot be predicted.

This conclusion has a basic flaw. The question of Allah’s knowledge is linked with the problem of TIME (a very complex philosophic question likes of which I have not set myself to deal with, as mentioned in the preface). Simply, put there is a basic difference between Allah’s knowledge and that of Man. The Quran cites the division of ‘Earth time’ into ‘day and night’ as among His great signs; also mentions the Sun and the Moon as instruments of calculation of time. This ‘time’ splits, for us earthly beings, into past, present and future. In the absolute sense, however these divisions of time do not exist. We lose all sense of time in sleep. As Bergson says: past, present and future are simply knots of human convenience on the thread of time. Time to Allah is an indivisible whole and, in Iqbal’s word, an ‘eternal now’. Since we humans are incapable of perceiving this as an indivisible whole, no example may explain it. However, one may try to explain it, to a limited extent, with reference to SPACE. Sitting inside a house we have no knowledge of the events outside (invisible). But, for someone on the roof of the building, those events are visible. Allah is, in the Quranic words, “Knower of the visible as well as the invisible, i.e., what is invisible to Man is visible to Allah.

As mentioned above, humans cannot rise above the ‘divisible time’. We can only become unaware of it during loss of conscious (sleep or coma). As Ghalib puts it wonderfully:


Allah, however, undergoes no loss of consciousness. He is above all this. Therefore, TIME for Him is one continuous Present.

In simpler words, then, Man is capable of exercising his free will to change his decisions. Allah knows what decisions Man is going to take. Therefore, Man does not know his own future actions whereas Allah does (know man’s future actions).

Predictions and Prophecies are Pure Conjecture

Therefore, it is erroneous to believe that anyone’s future may be predictable. One can’t predict the next spot a common fly is going to settle at, let alone the actions of a free-willed man. Iqbal says:

Fortune- Tellers & Astrologers

The Quran tells us that, during Man’s early (ignorant) days, astrologers and fortune-tellers used to hoodwink people into believing that the future was predictable. But, at the time of the Quran’s revelation – when Man was becoming of age – such people will be ‘flogged with lightening hunters” (72/8-9).

‘Din’ Transformed into Religion

That was when Islam was still ‘Din’. After its transformation into a religion, the Muslim world also saw the emergence of these prophets, fortune-tellers and astrologers. The free-willed Man, who was expected to carve his own destiny, sunk to having his future read by palmists. Iqbal put it thus:

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed

As it has been stated, the physical universe operates on the basic principle of ‘Cause and Effect’. Another basic principle is ‘the Uniformity of Nature’ which means that ‘the Law of Cause and Effect’ applies uniformly to the entire Universe. In other words, a CAUSE will create exactly the same EFFECT whenever and wherever the conditional factors are identical. In the social world of humans, this is known as the Law of Returns’.

The Two Levels of Human Life

Man’s life has two levels or aspects. One is PHYSICAL, just as the rest of the Universe, subject to the physical laws of Nature. For instance, humans reproduce like other animals and the elements affect them similarly in ingestion, digestion, excretion, sleep, wakefulness, illness, health, procreation, death etc. A human being even has the basic animalistic instincts like self-preservation, self-aggression and self-reproduction.

Then there is a higher level of human life manifested not in the body but in the HUMAN PERSONALITY. It is not subject to physical laws. Nonetheless, it has a different code of law called PERMANENT VALUES. Values deal with honesty, truthfulness, standards of good or bad and right or wrong. These values are reflected in what is called HUMAN CHARACTER. Animals have BEHAVIOR. Man has CHARACTER, too.

Physical laws of the Universe can be discovered through observation and experimentation. Permanent Values, however, come to Man only through divine revelation and are now preserved in the Quran. These values have their own set of laws (action and result) just as ‘cause and effect’ in the physical world. This is known as the Universal Law of Returns.

The characteristic of willful choice – unique to Man – is actually a trait of the human PERSONALITY, which flourishes by adhering to Permanent Values and withers away by violating them. By the way, a person with a developed personality is strong of will. A ‘developed’ personality lives even after the body’s death. That is ‘Life in the Hereafter’. Thus, permanent values work on Man’s personality just as physical laws do on his body. The law of cause & effect in both domains are natural and divine.

Three Categories of Laws

Human life is governed by these categories of laws:

Physical (laws of physics, chemistry, biology etc.) governing the human body.

Social laws enacted by government / society.

Permanent Values (moral & ethical laws) affecting the human personality.

All the three areas deem a person responsible for his / her action and the results thereof. In i) & ii), it may happen that one has to face consequences of someone else’s actions: for example, someone drowns in a river because somebody pushes one off a bridge (or the bridge gives way because of faulty workmanship); famine strikes because of bad administration; floods ravage an area; or war creates havoc, etc. In iii), however, every person bears consequences of one’s own action (even those affecting one’s personality). This is known as that person’s Record of Deeds.

The Quran holds Man responsible for all actions, individual or collective. It doesn’t recognize any action in any of the three categories as being the responsibility of Fate (predetermined destiny of Man) and not of Man himself. Man gets what he works for. Pre-determined is the Law of Returns and NOT Man’s actions. This is ‘Destiny of Allah’ not ‘Destiny of Man’! Man’s fate is nothing but the results of his (individual and/or collective) action! Let me elaborate some of these points.

1. ‘Your destiny is what you do’ (2/20)

The Quran presents the basic principle in this regard saying: “Whoever commits wrong (bad) deeds, surrounding himself with his mistakes – they are the people of hellfire”. Their hopes will be dashed. On the other hand, “those who are convinced and do good (beneficial) deeds are the people of  Paradise” (2/81-82). Elsewhere it says: “Whatever one does, begets full results” (2/281) — also in (3/24, 3/160, 40/17). But, an action has to be willful, as is stated in: “You will be held responsible (only) for actions committed by your heart (will)” (2/225). That is, one is not responsible for a forced action. In my view, this verse alone sufficiently makes evident the Quranic notion that Man is created ‘free of will’. In Surah Al-Anaam, it says: “Everyone has the responsibility of one’s own actions. No one carries another’s burden” (6/165). This is supported by (17/15; 35/18; 39/7; 53/38) etc.

In Surah An-Najm, it says: “Man can get only what he strives for” (53/39). Also, “Man is entitled to what he works for” (20/15). A just society is the one in which “no one’s efforts go wasted” (21/94) and that in which “your efforts bear results” (17/18-21).

Like individuals, this law applies to nations as well – “Your predecessor (nations of past) bore the consequences of what they did and you will have what you work for. You will not be queried about their actions” (2/134). Also, see (2/141). This is because the Law of Returns states: “Deeds bring results and responsibility to the doer (s)” (2/286). “People are destroyed by their own actions” (2/79).

Suffice to say that “Everyone is mortgaged by his own actions” (74/38).

2. “You get what you do” (9/82)

The Laws of Returns means each and every action (right or wrong) produces a reaction. This is of routine occurrence in the physical world, and easy to observe and accept. Everyday occurrences like fire burns if you touch it and water quenches your thirst are evident examples of this. But, permanent values are a different matter because their consequences are not readily & directly observable. Food satisfies hunger is easier to observe than it is to see how food wrongfully earned damages one’s personality. The ‘Materialistic Concept of Life’ does not believe in permanent values as it does not recognize the existence of the human personality. The materialists recognize only the social laws enacted by society / government. These laws bear consequences only when the relevant society comes to know actions – and that varies from one society to another.

The Soaring Global Crime Rate

The present alarming social deterioration all over the world & the ever-climbing crime-rate in all societies are due to one basic reason: People do not believe in the existence of human personality. Life to them is the physical life only.

But, the Quran has the human personality as the pivot of its philosophy. All actions of Man, individual or collective, produce reactions. In fact, this is stated as the reason for the existence of this Universe: “Allah created the skies and the earth (the universe) rightfully to get everyone the result of his actions and to stop all wrongdoing” (45/22). Again, “Everything in the skies and the earth is (working) for Allah so that people who do bad deeds get bad results and people doing good deeds get good results” (53/31).

In Surah Younis, it is stated that Allah’s program of creation – creating all things from nothingness (mabda’) and then reshaping them to ever new forms – exists only to get to people convinced of permanent values the results of their rightful deeds (10/4). This is repeated in (11/7, 18/6 & 67/2).

Surah Nisaa states: “whoever does wrong shall bear the consequence” (4/123) and “Whatever on does produces results” (9/82; 9/95; 14/51; 16/96-97; 40/17).

Elsewhere, the Quran states: “everyone shall get the result of one’s actions” (34/33). It is repeated in (7/147; 52/16; 56/24; 83/36) etc. Again, it states: “Allah doesn’t let go wasted any deed of a doer”.(3/197). Also: “Allah never wastes the return of good doers” (12/90; 3/144).

The Weighing Balance

It is to drive this very basic principle home that the Quran has used the simile of a weighing balance: “We shall, on the Day of Judgment, set up weighing balances and then no one shall be done wrong” (28/47). People with their good deeds weighing more than their bad ones shall prosper and flourish, the others shall be destroyed. (23/102-103). “Every small bit of human action shall be weighed” (3/16; 34/3; 99/7-8; 101/5-6). Actions shall be weighed and the reading will be given to the concerned to “See what they have been doing” (9/94; 9/7105; 10/23). This reading shall decide if the weighed deserves success because of a ‘developed personality’ or failure because of not having developed one’s personality (9/9-10).

It is hopefully clear through these Quranic verses that Man is responsible for all his actions and is not bound by pre-determined destiny.

Reward or punishment for forced, pre-determined actions is simply out of the question.

3. Read your book (of deeds) 17/33

The principle illustrated by the simile of the ‘Weighing Balance’ is elsewhere in the Quran elicited by the term ‘Book of Deeds’. It says: “We have appointed guardians and overseers around Man to record all his action” (13/11; 50/18). They are called  ‘the exalted writers’ (82/11). This record is like “an open and clear book” (10/16).

This book is housed in each & every man. Sura Beni Israel states: “Every man’s book of deeds hangs in his neck”. It is rolled shut now but will be opened on the Day of Judgment and the man will be told, ‘Read your book. It is self-evident for you to take your own account this day” (17/13-14). The list of deeds and actions will not require any witnesses other than the man himself who will frankly admit his mistakes (75/14).

This is the record about which the Quran says: “We have a book which says nothing but the truth” (23/62). It is this very record which will make the culprit shout in despair: “O if only I was a heap of dust!” (78/40).

It should be clear, then, that each and every human action (even a passing thought or a wrongful glance – 40/19) produces a result which is recorded according to the ‘Law of Returns’. Man’s book of deeds is blank at birth and he writes in it with his own hand to affect his personality accordingly. He writes his own destiny. As Iqbal says:


4. If you are good, you are good for your own self (17/7)

(Result of one man’s action cannot be transferred to another)

When action is dependent on one’s own free will, the resulting consequence cannot be shared or transferred. For instance, you may take or give money / wealth but cannot transfer to others the healthy results of regular exercise which you do. If you touch fire, only you have to bear the burning. Similarly, the consequences of one’s action on one’s personality cannot be transferred to another.

Individuality of the Human Personality

This exclusiveness is termed as the individuality of the Human Personality. In Sura Beni Israel, it is stated: “If you do good, it is to your own benefit and the bad deeds are (also) for your own self” (17/7). Again, in 41/16 it says: “Whoever does good, benefits his own self and whoever does bad only hurts himself”. It also says: “Your Protector is never unfair to people” (41/46), and also in 45/15. Elsewhere, it says: “One who strives, strives for one’s own self” (29/6). Sura Younis states: “O mankind! surely your defiance (of the Divine Law) will be upon your own self (you’ll bear the consequences)” (10/23) – also in 4/111. Sura Al-Anaam says: “you have been shown clear paths by your Preserver. So, Whoever keeps his eyes closed will bear the consequences on his own self” (6/105). It is repeated elsewhere: “O mankind! you have received the Truth from your Preserver. So, whoever chooses the right path shall beneficial from it while whoever goes astray will bear the loss” (10/108) – also in 17/15; 40/44; 31/12.

Another important point in this regard is that the consequences affecting the personality of a free-willed man stay for ever and cannot be erased by another man. For example, it says: “No one can help anyone through recommendation or bribe or otherwise” (2/48; 2/133).
It is not Commercial

Also it says: “Results of deeds may not be bought or helped through friendship or recommendation” (2/254). This rule applies uniformly to all. Even the Prophet himself says: “…. I fear. If I defy my Protector, I fear the punishment on that Great Day” (10/15; 9/13).

This uniqueness (individuality) of the human personality — being responsible for one’s one action – was the basis of the Prophet’s announcement to non-Muslims: “We have our deeds, you have yours” (2/139). “You will not be queried about our ‘crimes’ not will we be asked about your actions” (34/25). “For you, your ‘din’, for us ours” (109/6). “My actions are for me yours for you. You are not responsible for my actions nor I for yours” (10/41).

Responsibility of action is only for the free-willed and never for the forced. Even Allah doesn’t interfere. He just keeps a watch: “Allah sees your actions” (2/237). “He knows them” (2/234). “No action can go unnoticed by Him”. (2/144), even “Allah knows what is in your hearts” 2/235).

“Allah watches your actions” means that no action can escape the Law of Returns – “Allah surrounds whatever you do” (3/119). That is why every responsibly action by Man produces a reaction and every man has to bear the consequences of his actions.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


You must have come across routine events like the following:

i)          When a patient recovers, it is credited to the perseverance and skillsof physicians; but failure of treatment is attributed to destiny, pre-determined by Allah.

ii)         Success in an academic examination is credited to the diligence of the candidate whereas failure is attributed to Allah.

iii)        A favorable verdict in a legal case is attributed to the brilliant skills of the counsel but Allah is blamed in case of the contrary result.

iv)        A male offspring is cause enough for celebrations in the family but a baby-girl draws sympathetic consoling remarks like: “What could you do? Allah wanted it so!”

Success due to oneself, failure due to Allah

Thus, Man considers himself helpless and bound in case of failure but deems himself free of will in case of success. This mental attitude is the remnant of mankind’s early days when, finding themselves helpless against certain natural phenomena, they began thinking of a super-natural power. Traditional Religion has fed such ideas to this day through so-called ‘sacred’ evidences such as “عرفت الله بفسخ العزائم ” (I know Allah (exists) because of failure of my plans). (1)

(1) This saying is attributed to Ali (the Prophet’s cousin and the fourth Caliph), but it appears erroneous. In my opinion, it has come from one of the ‘Sufis’ (mystics).

Oriental poetry, thriving on grief, affliction and despair, has painted the picture more bleak by verses such as :


Mysticism finally stamped this notion into a firm, established religious belief. Let us try to see the stance of Allah’s ‘Din’ in this regard.

What is ‘museeba’? (1)

The Arabic word ‘museeba’ stems from the three-letter root ص و ب  , which carries the basic and intrinsic meaning of something descending to come to its resting place. Thus each and every occurrence or event may be termed as ‘museeba’. The Quran uses ‘museeba’ in contrast to ‘hasana’ (9/50) meaning something pleasant. Hence the popular use of ‘museeba’ for an unpleasant event.

The point to ponder is whether ‘musaaeb’ (tragedies and afflictions) are caused by Allah or by Man (individually or collectively). The Quran presents an elaborate reply.

‘Musaaeb’ are caused by Man’s actions

Sura Shura says: “There is no tragedy which befalls you but as result of your own handiwork” (42/30). Sura Aale-Imran states that when they (people) are struck by an affliction, they wonder where it came from (أنى هـذا) – ‘ Tell them: “it is of your own doing” (3/164). Sura Nahal also says the same: “Their own wrongdoing brought tragedy to them” (16/34).

(1)  Commonly translated in Urdu as affliction or grief.

The Reprieve

Allah’s established procedure for wrong / bad actions is that their consequences are not readily observable initially and take some time in materializing. This time gap is the grace period of reprieve. In Sura Az-Zumr, it is stated that people who chose to go gleefully away from Allah’s way, defying and ridiculing His laws but in a little while “what wrong they have done will bear result and that (Divine Law ) which they are ridiculing now will surround them” (39/48).

The Quran uses a very meaningful expression for this grace period of reprieve between an action and the subsequent result of it. It likens it to someone sending (this result) on before he starts his own journey. Reaching the destination, one finds that result already waiting (for the sender). The Quran uses the expression (بما قَدّمَت أيديهم) – ‘whatever their hands send on before’. Sura Aal-e-Imran talks about Allah recording all the crimes committed which will bear results as life goes on and they will be told: “This is what your hands sent on before” (3/181-182). These results have also been referred to by the expression (ما اسلفت) – i.e. “those which have passed (this path) before” (10/30). Sure Al-Hajj also uses the same expression in (22/9-10). Sura Al-Qasas states about the children of Israel (Jews) that when they are faced with a bad situation, which they have themselves sent on before, they start moaning and complaining (28/47); also: 4/62. Sura Rome talks about people’s attitude of crediting success to themselves boastfully, but getting depressed and frustrated over tragedies which they have already sent on themselves before (30/36). It is repeated in 42/49. Sura Al-Fajr states that faced with the ultimate destruction, Man will call out in despair, “only if I had sent something on for my life!” (89/24).

This applies to tragedies and afflictions as well as bounties and benefits. Sura Muzammel says: “Whatever good you send on for yourselves will be ready with Allah” (73/20).

The same phenomenon is also referred to as “whatever their selves send on for them” (5/80). The Quran holds Man’s personality (self) responsible for his actions since it is the seat of his power of choice and free will. That is why it says: “Self (the human personality) should keep an eye on what it sends on for tomorrow (the future)” (59/18). About realization of results it says: “Self will come to know what it sent on or left behind” (82/5) because  “We write down what they send on and what they leave behind” (36/12) and that “Everything is registered in a clear book which is (always walking) ahead of them” (36/12).

Thus, all tragedies and afflictions are brought upon Man by himself (individually or collectively). Sura Baqara talks about the calamities befalling the children of Israel saying: “Their tragedy was of their own doing” (2/79) because “they were unfair and law-breakers” (2/59) – also: 2/61; 3/111.

Ignominy and Disgrace

In fact, Allah’s universal law (that ignominy and disgrace are results of Man’s own actions) applies to anyone and all. When a nation chooses to ignore even a part of Allah’s law, they are ‘disgraced in this world and subject to severe punishment on the Day of Judgment” (2/85) – also: 2/114; 22/9-10. Sura Al-Fajr states the same in a different way: “When Man is disgraced, he says “O my God! You disgraced me for nothing!” (89/9-16). Allah replies that it is not true. “Allah doesn’t disgrace anyone. You have been disgraced by our own wrongdoing — you used to abandon the helpless of your society; you had all the vices of a capitalistic economy — such actions brought ignominy to you, not Allah!”, also 92/4-10.

Allah is not unfair

The fact that Allah doesn’t disgrace anyone without due cause (one’s own wrongdoing), as this is unfair, has been illustrated many times over in the Quran. Sura Aal-e-Imran talks about the tyrants of society being eventually destroyed, and — “Allah is not unfair to them but they are unfair to themselves” (3/116). Sura Tauba, after speaking of destruction of the nations of the past, says: “Allah did not treat them cruelly, but they brought it upon them themselves” (9/70). Also in 11/101; 16/33 and 29/40. Sura Younis states: “Allah is not unfair to people in the slightest, but they do it to themselves” (10/44). Allah is omnipotent and Man is His (weak and vulnerable) creation. Allah’s being cruel and unfair to Man is inconceivable. People bring tragedies to themselves by their own hands (ذلك بما قدمت يدك) “Allah is not cruel to His creatures” (22/10). In fact, “Allah doesn’t (even) intend to be cruel to His people” (40/31). He argues: “Why will Allah torture you if you accept (the validity of His laws) and (show that you) are convinced ( of their practical value)?” (4/147).

Allah is not a sadist. In His domain “every decision is based upon the Truth” and “everyone gets the result of one’s actions” and “no one is wronged” (39/69-70). About the time of Man’s actions bearing results, it says: “that day everyone will get what he worked for and no one will be wronged” (40/17). Also: “Decisions will be taken justly and fairly and no one will be wronged” (10/47) – also: (10/54).

Two verses from An-Nisa

In this regard, two ‘verses’ from Sura An-Nisa are quite significant. Talking about the ‘reverse’ mentality of a certain group of the Prophet’s era, the Quran says: “when they are in a pleasant situation, they attribute it to Allah, but blame the Prophet for their troubles. Tell them “everything is from Allah” (‘s law) 4/78. Further, it says: “What is (wrong) with them? They don’t try to understand. Remember, the pleasantness you get is from Allah and your troubles are from you yourselves” (4/79).

There is an apparent contradiction here. One verse says the good and the bad all come from Allah, whereas the other verse appears to say the good is from Allah but the bad is from Man. The apparent contradiction can actually be resolved thus:

i)          All events- good or bad – occur according to natural (Allah’s) laws

(كل من عند الله).

ii)         Allah’s Law – if followed – shall bring good to you –

ما اصابك من حسنة فمن الله


iii)        If you follow the path of your own choice (other than Allah’s), the natural result will be trouble.  ما اصابك من سيئة فمن نفسك

Simply put, then, all events (actions) bear results pre-determined by Allah’s law. If one follows the natural (Allah’s suggested) course, one benefits. Otherwise (when one defies the divine law) the natural consequence is tragedy.

Therefore, all good is from Allah whereas evil is brought upon Man by himself. This point shall be elaborated later in the book under a separate heading of ‘Good and Evil’.


We can conclude, therefore, that (i) to attribute a tragedy to Allah is not only erroneous factually but is blaming Allah wrongfully. When people try to philosophize a tragedy by utterances like: “Man proposes and God disposes, ‘His is all powerful. He can do whatever, whenever He wants’, ‘Only He knows why He does what He does’, etc. they project an image of a lawless, irregular and unreasonable Allah, and (ii) all Man’s efforts and endeavors are furtile and all events occur because of (a whimsical Allah). This reduces Man to a bound, will-less creature. (I shall deal with this point in some detail later in the book).

By Chance

It is true that:

i)        Occasionally, an event has to be attributed to ‘chance’ as we cannot explain it, and

ii)       an individual is sometimes beset with tragedy not directly attributable to the    person concerned. Sometimes, Allah’s law appears to be working in the          opposite direction (producing evil instead of good), as in the case of an honest official who suffers in a dishonest society.

As to ‘chance’ in (I) above, there can never be an ‘effect’ without a ‘cause’ in the universe. But, the cause has to be discovered by Man. During the early period of its history, mankind used to attribute, due to lack of knowledge, almost every phenomenon to chance. That has been changing through Man’s march of civilization. Even today, certain uncivilized tribes in various parts of the world attribute certain phenomena to gods and goddesses. It is not so any longer when scientific discoveries unravel the mysteries of Nature. This situation improves with every generation. This ignorant state of affairs may be observed in certain sections of society even in the civilized world. As Man moves forward in the realm of science, ‘chance’ will give way completely to factual knowledge attained by mankind. Man has the potential to discover the entire Universe (2/31).

‘Chance’ is nothing but lack of knowledge!.

Individuals in an Unfair Society

As to (ii) above, an individual is a part / member of a society and, as such, is affected by it anyway. For example, a good harvest benefits even those not connected with farming at all. On the other hand, a bursting dam extends its damage even to those who have nothing at all to do with its construction or maintenance. This is why the Quran say: “Try to protect your society against a danger which is not restricted to the people responsible for it” (8/25).

Man behaves oddly in a society. Benefiting from the good – facilities, benefits etc. – one never refuses them on the grounds that one is not directly responsible for them. On the other hand, however, one is always complaining about the badness of society for which, again, one is not directly responsible. This attitude is referred to in the Quran: “When Man is enjoying Our bounties, he turns away (arrogantly from Allah’s law), but when evil comes to him, he raises hue and cry” (17/83). It goes on to say: “Say, everyone works according to one’s tether”, therefore is directly or indirectly responsible for what happens in society. The Quran gives a graphic illustration of this in Sura Sabaa (the leaders and the led quarreling about, and blaming one another for, society’s ills): “If you just imagine the time when the transgressors will be in Alllah’s presence blaming one another for their mistakes. The led will say to the leaders, ‘but  for your misleading leadership we would have followed Allah’s laws’. The leaders will say, ‘Why blame us? We didn’t stop you from following the right path. you wronged of your own choice. You blame us wrongly!’ The led will say, ‘ You crafted a society which kept us away from the right path. How can you escape responsibility?” (34/31-33). But, excuses of both will be rejected and punishment will come to them equally: (37/33) – The leaders for their wrongdoing and the led for being their power base.

This then, is the Quran’s view of an individual and society. A society is nothing but a collection of individuals who have the potential of enforcing change. Please note that the Quran does not accept as valid the excuse of being helpless from free-willed Man. This very excuse brought upon Iblees the eternal punishment of being banished from benefits. It is perfectly possible, though, that individuals fail in their initial attempt(s) to bring about change in their society. But this is very different from presenting helplessness as an excuse for inaction. People who try are commended by Allah (2/157), others will naturally go to hell (4/97).

Early Muslim History

This, therefore, is the Quran’s position on social tragedies. Social life (collective existence) will be dealt with in more detail later in this book under ‘Rise & Fall of Nations’). As long as Muslims kept in view this Quranic position, they faced problems logically, factually and on the basis of cause & effect. The public would point out any flaws in administration and the officials would attend to them. Any difficulties on the social level were dealt with by improving the people’s own individual (or collective) behavior. No one would blame problems on Allah or pre-determined taqdeer (destiny)!

A Conspiracy

Later, the rulers grew more and more oppressive which resulted in ever-increasing social ills, problems and tragedies. To avoid any public uprising against them, the rulers collaborated with the clergy – no Pharaoh can claim to be the supreme provider (أنا ربكم الأعلى) without help from Haman (the clergy) – who began propagating the view that the rulers, their oppression and power, all social problems and individual tragedies etc. occur by the pre-determined will of Allah and thus is unavoidable and is to be patiently accepted as fate. Any dissent – even a mere thought of it – is going against the will of Allah is apostasy!

This propaganda through the years established as an article of the faith (anti-Quranic) belief of (pre-destined) calamities as the will of Allah.

Please remember, the Quran announces: “There is no calamity but brought upon you by your own hands” (42/30) – be it individual, like touching a flame, or collective as a dam giving way or the righteous suffering in a wrong society!.

This last point needs a little more elaboration. Sura Maida says: “O the convinced people! Keep a watch over your selves. If you keep to the right path, the wrongdoers will not be able to bring any harm to you” (5/105). This verse reveals great truths.

It says one will be safe from wrongdoers if one is on the right path. But our experience is in contradiction of this. A righteous, honest person is conspired against, wronged, and harmed by the devious. How, then, the Quran can claim what it does? This requires some deliberation.

As stated previously, Man has two levels of life. One is physical, subject to natural physical laws. On this level, there is no distinction between the good and the bad people. A flame burns anyone – believer or non-believer alike, poison kills both. Tilling land according to sound agricultural knowledge brings good harvest to everyone.

Sura Beni Israel Says:

“Our law is that whoever desires the worldly benefits and strives for them according to our deliberately established natural laws, gets them. But, the future for such a person is bled and hellish.

Contrarily, whoever desires benefits of both worlds – present & future – and strives for them accordingly, convinced of permanent values, gets good results in the present as well as the future.

Thus, both categories keep moving forward in life. Your Provider does not deprive either of the two categories of the due result of their efforts. (17/18-26).

That means the physical laws work equally for both Muslims and non-Muslims.

This is repeated in (42/20). This, therefore is Allah’s law on the physical level.

The other level of life – the human – is higher than the physical and is governed by permanent moral values. Living according to these values sustains and nourishes the human personality. Defiance of these values results in stalling the growth of the human personality. This is known as the future or the hereafter. But, importantly, at this level both the physical and the human lives co-exist. In a righteous (Islamic) social situation both levels of life are duly looked after without any mutual clashes. Not so in a wrong (un-Islamic) social set-up. These are clashes between the righteous people (convinced of the permanent values) and the wrongdoers (the unconvinced). In such situations, the righteous do not like to give up permanent values in favor of the worldly benefits. That is why the righteous sometimes suffer on the physical-life level. But their personalities (أنفسكم) remain protected (5/105), and the benefit and damage to the human personality can only be judged when weighed in Allah’s balance of the Law of Returns (5/105).

Importance of Material Benefits

The Quran does not ignore the material side of physical life, but considers it very important. It says of a ‘momin’s’ (the convinced, righteous person) life, “good in the world and good in the hereafter” (2/210). The question to consider is: How to strike a balance between the two levels of life? That is the whole point of the Quranic program. The clash between a righteous and a materialistic person is termed as the clash between the Right and the Wrong. When the righteous lose this battle, it is because they, in a wrongful society, exist as individuals whereas the materialists gang up. The Quran suggests the righteous get together and form an alliance against the wrongdoers. This is not easy, though.

Clash of Right & Wrong

It is a continual fight termed as ‘jehad: Sura Baqara says: “Do you hope to enter Paradise effortlessly? You also, just as the righteous of yester- years, have to go through crushing struggle. They used to fight on and on under grueling circumstances, occasionally wondering when their efforts would bear fruit. It was only then (after a long, sustained, crushing battle) that they would be successful with Allah’s help. Remember, you have to do likewise!” (2/214).

As an example, the Quran speaks of the Battle of Ahzaab: “During that awful time, you were surrounded by the enemy forces, you were frightened blind with your hearts pounding wildly and (the not-so-convinced among) you were beginning to doubt the validity of Allah’s promises. Under such awesome circumstances, the convinced displayed their steadfastness in the face of problems! (33/10-11). Such are the situations when the righteous face (physical damage and loss:

“You will face war and killing, shortage of food, loss of life and property, damage to crops and orchards. But eventually, good news will come to the steadfast who constantly keep in view their target of replacing the wrong evil system with the right good one. They say” “We are devoted to this cause. Regardless of problems and difficulties, we will keep striving to achieve that goal by moving towards that target” (2/155-156).

Obviously, one needs, along with steadfastness, material equipment. That is why it says: “Be ready to defend your borders” (8/60). On a battlefield, the righteous  suffer from a technical mistake just as any other fighting force. One very illustrative example from Muslim history is the Battle of Ohud where the Muslims were defeated incurring heavy losses and the Prophet, after being injured, had to be rescued.

For such occasions, the Quran comforts the righteous: “Why worry over your problems? Your opponents also face them” (4/104). “These universal laws apply to all mankind” (3/139).

If the righteous come out victorious, they establish a just society in which (5/105) becomes practically operative, and so does 2/210.

Those who die before the establishment of such as a social system suffer in this world and life but their life in the hereafter is enviable. They are called ‘Killed in Allah’s path’ and they are to be considered alive and shall live for ever (2/154).

This success, however, comes with Man’s own effort which bears fruit in a collective (social) form of life of a nation.

I shall deal with this point in the next chapter.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


Nature’s ‘Law of Returns’ applies to nations as well as to individuals. It decides their rise and fall, life and death. Because, as seen in Chapter 5, an individual’s ‘fate’ is connected with that of a nation, the Law of Returns pertaining to nations extends to individuals, too. Please recall Allah’s law regarding change in a nation’s circumstances —

“Allah doesn’t bring about a change in a nations circumstances unless it changes what is in their hearts (psychology)” (13/11, 8/253). This amr  (1) is referred to in (8/42): “So that Allah’s amr is enforced. So that destruction and life come (to nations) according to clear (laws and reasons).” No nation survives or dies away whimsically (without cause or reason): “So that your Protector / Preserver never destroys the abode (of a nation) wrongfully while they are unaware (of its causes)” (6/32). Also: “It is not befitting Allah to destroy a settlement (of a nation) wrongfully while the inhabitants still have a chance of redemption.” (11/117). Sura Rome speaks about the primary audience of the Quran.

Historical Evidence (the Arabs)  — despite numerous warnings of the destructive consequences of their wrong conduct, they haven’t heeded. Ask them to look at the historical evidence in this regard to see what happened to nations in the past:

“If they seek it, they shall find the evidence in history. Those nations of the past were richer and stronger than these (Arabs) are. They had created wealth by hard work, established civilizations and countries more populated than these (Arabs’). Their prophets brought to them clear laws.

Allah never destroys a nation unless it brings it upon itself through its own wrongdoing. The messengers of Allah came to them and were ridiculed and refuted. Refusal to change their ways resulted for those nations in creating social ills and imbalance and they were ultimately destroyed.” (30/9-10).

(1) amr has been discussed in chapter-2

Refuting a Messenger

Let us ponder for while on the expression ‘refuting a messenger (تكذيب رسل). A patient who doesn’t listen to the advice of his doctor is practically denying the medical knowledge by refusing to act upon the advice. This is refuting — (denying) the truth and acting contrary to it. The Quran cites examples of past nations who refuted and ridiculed Allah’s messengers and, consequently, faced the inevitable destruction. The Quran, employing its philosophy of history, advises and warns its readers to learn a lesson from the historical accounts of past nations and avoid repeating the fatal mistake of ignoring (refuting) Allah’s Law of Returns by acting contrary to it. It says: “There were several nations before you. Explore the Earth and see what happened to the one who refuted” (3/136, 6/11, 16/36)— “and the one who had been warned!” (10/73) Sura An’aam says that nations are destroyed as a consequence of their (own) crimes: “Have they pondered upon the destroyed nations of the past? They enjoyed more wealth and power than these (present day people), they had an abundance of food and prosperity. But, they were destroyed through their own sins and were replaced by other people” (6/6).

Unfairness breads Destruction

The sins (crimes / defiance of Natural Law of Returns) which bring about the downfall of a people are numerous, the topmost being zulm (injustice, or better still, unfairness), saying clearly: The people who are unfair, have their roots cut”. (6/45) Having mentioned the destruction and fall of those nations, the Quran says: “These are the ruins of cities whose inhabitants were unfair” (18/59). Elsewhere, it says:

“ (If they wish, history can speak to them about) Several civilizations who were caught up by Our Law of Returns because those people were unfair. Their tall buildings fell, their wells became useless and their strong fortifications fell in ruins.

Haven’t these (present day) people visited these areas yet so that (having seen those nations’ sorry end) they start being rational and begin to heed? (when someone chooses to turn a blind eye to the truth, his eyes still see but) their inner eyes (hearts) go blind and thus their thinking faculties are blunted. (22/45-46)

Narrating the eye-opening accounts of several past nations, the Quran repeats the truth: “No settlement is destroyed unless its inhabitants are unfair”. (28/59) (1)

Thus, the rise and fall of nations is dependent upon their own deeds. Their fate is NOT pre-determined. They themselves decide their own destiny.

Period of Respite

It has been stated that, according to the Law of Returns, the time gap between an action and the manifestation of its result is a period of respite termed as ajal  by the Quran. As the life of a nation spreads over centuries (as compared to days or years in case of an individual), their period of respite is longer, too. A tyrannical people, who exploit and suppress humanity, appear to go on prospering, is really passing through its ajal (the period of respite). Sura Namal Says:

“ If (Allah had not provided the period of respite and) people were apprehended quickly after their unfairness, the Earth would have lost its inhabitants. Allah delays (the apprehension) till a certain period of respite (ajal). When that period expires, their destruction occurs at the specific time — not a minute before or after” (16/61; also 35/45).

This Law is strictly enforced:  “No nation can hurry or delay it.” ( 23/43) The period of respite can save a nation if it redeems and improves itself. Otherwise, it is destroyed.

(1)    I do not propose to dwell upon these historical accounts. They have been treated in my works like ‘Islam Kya Hai (What is Islam?), Jooey Noor, Barq-e-Toor and Shola-e-Mastoor.

Every ajal has a Law

Even this period of respite is not pre-determined. It is not pre-destined, for instance, for a nation to attain and retain power and glory, come what may, for two centuries. The period of glory is determined by a nation’s own deeds and varies accordingly. The Quran says, in principal, the following:

i)          “Every nation has an ajal (period of life) – (10/40), and

ii)         Every ajal has a book (law) – (13/38)

A nation may determine its own period of respite (life) according to law. This law of respite is no mystery. (An unknown, mysterious law is useless. Law is intended to be known to those who are supposed to follow it, so that they know its consequences. That’s why the Quran cites the historical evidence to illustrate its law of rise and fall of nations, and aptly terms it” a known law”. (15/4) This is “Allah’s way” which never changes (35/43), and it is the Law of Rise and Fall of Nations. For as long as a nation keeps on the right path (Allah’s way) it retains its glory. When it defies Allah’s Law, decline sets in. It enjoys a period of respite (within which there is a chance of correcting itself to retain the glory) before the decline and fall is complete. That nation is then replace by another who has been following Allah’s way. Early Muslims, who had, as a result of following Allah’s way achieved power and glory (24/55) were told:

“If you refrain from struggle (for life and survival), you will face tragic misfortune — another nation will replace you — and you will be helpless. These are Allah’s measures.”  (9/39), (11/57).

Sura Mohammad says:

“There are those among you who, when told to share their wealth with the needy, act miserly. They should know that miserliness turns against the miser. Allah doesn’t need you. You need Him for your survival. If you digress from the right path, Allah will substitute you with another nation who will (be better than and) not be like you.” (47/38).

It is because the law of rise and fall (life and death) of nations is: “whichever nation follows the Right path of life, survives. Others go in decline and are replaced by better nations (who follow Allah’s way). The rise and fall of nations is determined by their own deeds. That, then, is the fate of nations (Allah’s law).


We have seen that: every event (tragic or pleasant) in life (social or individual) occurs according to Nature’s established law. Man is capable of discovering that law and exercising his free will to follow or defy it.

Nonetheless, some verses in the Quran may appear confusing to the superficial reader. Let us look at those carefully to ascertain their true meaning. For example, Sura Hadeed says (according to conventional interpretation): “No calamity comes to your society or self which had not been written in a book before We created this Universe” (57/22).(1)  Again, Sura Tauba says: “Say we won’t get but whatever Allah has written for us”(9/51) (1)  Verses such as these are said to refer to pre-determination (destiny or fate) and have contributed a great deal to establish the common belief in an eternal, unchangeable and unavoidable destiny for individuals as well as groups. This is the source of reference to Allah as ‘the Writer of Destiny’.

Let us look at these verses in a Quranic perspective:

A ‘book’ to Arabs was (and still is) binding loose leaves. (2) But the derivative root of kitab is K-T-B which is pregnant with the sense of a legal obligation e.g.,

(1)      Translation by Maulana Mahmood-al-Hassan.
(2)        The Quran opens with “This is the book which …. (Sura Baqara)”. This indicates that the Quran was already in the form of a book (bound leaves) before the Prophet died. The commonly held belief that the Quran was gathered and bound into book-form after the Prophet’s death appears contradictory to the Quranic evidence. Thus the Quran was gathered, arranged and bound into a book during Mohammad’s life.

i)    Sura Nisa uses the word Kitab for prohibition of marriage to certain relatives. (4/24) Maulana Mahmood-al-Hasan has translated the verse as “ you have been ordered by Allah”, meaning thereby that he translates kitab as ‘order’. We have said earlier in the book that the Quran has used the word ‘hukm’ in general for ‘qanoon’ (law). ‘Hukum’ means a decision. A decision or an order which attains permanence is LAW, e. g., a governmental decision for all traffic to drive on the left. Similarly, Nature’s decision that fire radiates heat is law because it is permanent and hence is Allah’s Law.

ii)   Sura Baqara uses the word kitab in (2/235).  Maulana Mahmoud-al-Hasan translates the verse thus: “And don’t intend to (enter) wedlock until the determined waiting (period) is reached”. Hence ‘kitab’ has been translated as ‘determined’ i.e., determined by Allah. This is His order, decision or LAW.

iii)  “Sala is a periodic duty / obligation (kitaban) for the convinced” (4/104)

vi)  “In it (the Quran) there are established laws (kutub)”. (98/3)

v)   “You have been obliged (kuteba) to Qisas”. (2/178)

vi)  “You have been obliged (kuteba) to fasting (days)”. (2/183)

vii) “You have been obliged (kuteba) to fight (battles).” (2/216)

viii) “About lonely women: “You don’t give them what has been determined (by law – kuteba) for them”. (4/12)

ix)  “And We decreed (katabna) in Zaboor, after treating morals that the worthy shall inherit the earth”. (21/105)

x)   Record of nations’ deed is also referred to as ‘their book’ in 45/28 saying: “Every nation shall be called to their book, (and told), you shall face the consequences of what you have been doing.” Obviously, this shall be done according to Nations’ Law of Returns. Allah has referred to it as ‘His book’: “Our book speaks only the truth about you” (45/29); also: (20/52).

xi)  Nation’s Book

Sura An’aam talks about Allah’s knowledge encompassing the Universe – every leaf which falls off a tree, grains in the darkness of the earth, good and bad, dry and wet – everything is in ‘the clear book’ (6/59). Obviously, the book here means the laws of the physical universe.

xii) Sura Aal-Imran talks about the ‘established’ regulations given in clear-cut terms (as compared to the ‘similes and, examples’ to give universal truths). These ‘established’ (محكمات      ) are referred to as ‘mother of the book’ (3/6), i.e., the foundation and basis of law. Earlier, we have seen that universal laws are determined in the realm of Allah’s Amr, and are realized in the realm of Khalq. That’s why the Quran says, the origin and basis of laws is with Allah’ (13/39). About the Sura itself, it says that you have it in the form of (Arabic) letters and words but: “We have it in the mother of the book” (43/4).

‘Mother of the book’ or the ‘realm of Amr’ means Allah’s knowledge which is absolutely comprehensive — “Don’t you know that Allah knows what ever is there in the skies and the earth? That (knowledge) is in a book” (22/70), says Sura Hajj. Elsewhere, it is referred to as “the clear book” (27/75).

Every event in the Universe passes through various phases on the path to its occurrence. These phases are referred to by the Quran as ‘mustauda’ (temporary store / transitory stages). Its culmination is called ‘mastaqar’ (destination). Sura Qamar says: “And each Amr (case) is a mastaqar (destination)” (54/3). And that: “Every (piece of) news has a destination.” (6/67).  Also, in Sura Hood: “Allah knows the transitory stage (s) and the destination (of all things). All this (information) is in a clear book.” (11/6)

The destination of an event is its realized form. The transitory stages are subject to the law of Cause and Effect (except for the initial Amr Stages). Man may obtain information about this according to his capacity to learn. It is possible, though, that some of the transitory stages are still waiting to be discovered by Man. The waiting period (respite) between a human action and its result really comprises of transitory phases unobservable by Man. He can only notice the destination of an event and not the transitory phases. Sura Anbiaa says: “There were many settlements destroyed by Us because of their unfairness and We brought forward another nation (to take their place).” During their unfairness, and after that during its transitory phases which they couldn’t observe, they felt immune to accountability and consequences of their actions. But, in reality, their actions were unnoticeably moving towards their destination — “When they saw Our punishment, they began scrambling to escape it”. (21/11-12) “But Our Law of Returns beckoned them to stop (and said) – ‘You can’t escape now. Come back to your pleasure houses where you enjoyed (as parasites) wealth earned by others, so that you can be asked what right you had to consume wealth not earned by you!’ They will raise a hue and cry but it will be to no avail. They will be reduced to a crop-less field or an extinguished flame!” (21/13-15)

Coming back to every event’s transitory phases and destination in ‘the clear book’ it can be seen that:

i)    Kitab (book) means laws (code of law),

ii)   all laws are determined and established in the ‘realm of Amr’ — referred to as ‘Book of Allah’ (Allah’s knowledge), and

iii)  in the realm of Khalq, these laws are noticeable as Laws of Nature and are depicted in the Quran. They are again referred to ‘Book of Allah’ but here (as opposed to ii above), Man can obtain this knowledge, because they are in ‘clear book’ or ‘the known book’.

Important verse regarding the question of FATE

Let us now refer back to the verses, referred to earlier, one many find confusing or contradictory in content. Take a look first at the verses from Sura Hadeed:

“No calamity comes to a country nor to yourselves which was not pre-written in a book before We created this world. Verily, this is easy for Allah so that you don’t grief over what you can’t get or boast over what He gave you. And Allah doesn’t like the boastful show-offs.” (57/22-23)

– Translation in Urdu by Maulana Moahmoud-al-Hasan

This is commonly taken to mean that every calamity is pre-destined and is unavoidable. In such a helpless situation, men must patiently take what comes naturally. This attitude is considered to be a quality of pious men and is referred to as being ‘pleased with the will of Allah’. Also, men must not feel proud of the good in life as it is made possible by Allah and not by Man!

1.   In the first instance, this interpretation of the verses in question nullifies the entire concept of the very basis of Din (the Quranic system, …… the Law of Returns. Allah appears to be contradicting His own verses like “Man gets only what he strives for”, “Every calamity which befalls Man is of his own doing”, “Allah neither blesses nor punishes whiteout due cause and reason — it is all a consequence of Man’s own actions”. etc.

The Quran doesn’t contradict itself

Thus, this interpretation does not appear reasonable. We must also remember that the consistency of the Quran has been cited by it as evidence of its being divine (4/82). Let us, then, try to see what the verses in question really mean:

Each and every occurrence in the physical universe, as well as Man’s social world, takes place under pre-determined laws enacted by Allah.

Allah has pre-determined laws not only for calamities but also for alleviating them. For example, fire burns, but balm soothes. Therefore, in the face of a calamity (Allah’s taqdeer) do the needful to counter it by following (in Omer Farooq’s words) another of Allah’s Taqdeer. Disappointment and passive acceptance of tragedies may be the norm in a worldly oppressive despot but not that of the law-abiding Allah. So study your environment, world and universe and act according to the knowledge of Nature’s Laws you learn.

2.   Secondly, Sura Anfal talks about a battle where a number of the enemy’s soldiers were taken prisoner with the intent of later charging money for their release. This was against the spirit of din (philosophy of religion). But, since it was a tactical mistake, it was thought worthy of just a reproach in 8/67 which is conventionally translated by Maulana Mohmoud-al-Hasan. Thus: “If Allah had not pre-written this, you would have faced severe punishment ( and tragedy).”

But, the true interpretation is: ‘What you did deserves severe punishment but, since Allah’s law in this regard has already been given in the Quran (that errors merit just a reproach), you are hereby not punished.

3.   Thirdly, Sura Tauba talks about dissemblers (hypocrites) who get very upset when the Muslims are doing well. They are pleased when the convinced are facing problems, distancing themselves from the Muslims by saying that they have before hard taken precautions against such circumstances. The Quran goes on to say in 9/51 (as conventionally translated in Urdu by Maulan Masul-al-Hasan): “Say (to them), we shall not get but whatever Allah has already written down for us. Only He is our benefactor, and Muslims should rely on Allah alone.”

The true meaning of it, however, is: “Tell them that whatever happens to us is (not according to your misconceptions or ill-will) under the Law of Returns, Therefore, whatever occurs is inevitable according to that law and is unavoidable. We, the Muslims, are convinced fully of its validity and permanence. We are, therefore, not upset over whatever you might say.”

The words ‘whatever Allah has written for us’ do not mean our pre-determined fate but whatever law has already been established. Fore example, see (2/187) where it says: ‘Strive to get whatever Allah has written for you. “obviously, ‘written’ in this verse does not mean pre-determined fate’ because that is inevitable and, as such, does not require any effort to get. Similarly, in (58/21) it says: “Allah has written that He and His prophets will out come out victorious.” The Quran is full of the monumental struggle which prophets had to do to succeed in their missions. Sura ‘Araaf cites Moses’ people requesting Allah to “write for us good things in this life as well as in the hereafter.” Allah’s response was: “These (good things) are WRITTEN for those who (are ‘muttaqeen) follow Allah’s laws.

By Allah’s Permission / Order

The Quran nowhere mentions the commonly held belief that ‘not even a leaf on a tree stirs without Allah’s permission’.

We have already talked about the apparent contradiction in the Quran regarding calamities befalling Man (66/11 and 42/30). Verse (42/30) is very clear in its meaning which is the only one it can have. Therefore, verse (64/11) must use ‘b-izn-Allah’ (by Allah’s permission) in a different sense. Let us examine it.

Meaning of Izn:    The Arabic word izn basically means an announcement. The Muslim call for obligatory prayer is azaan. It is also used to mean permission as well as knowledge. ‘Izn Allah’ also means Allah’s knowledge’. (1) We have already seen that when Allah’s knowledge and intention (amr) enters the realm of khalq, it becomes law. We have also established that a permanent order (decision) is law. The same principle applies to permission, i.e., a permanent permission is called ‘law, as we understand it. This is the very sense of the term ‘Izn Allah’ used by Quran, e. g.,

i)    Sura Hajj : “People who have been oppressed (Muslims who had migrated away from the Meccan oppression and were still hounded by enemies of Islam, and were under the threat of hostile armed attack) are given permission to do battle”. (22/39. Obviously, this permission to take up arms is not confined to the time and people. Given the necessary conditions, battle will always be permissible. Such a situation will not need a special permission every time it occurs. That is why when Muslim fought the Jew (in the battle of Khyber) and uprooted some date-trees for tactical reason, the Quran said they did it with Allah’s permission (59/5).

ii)   Agriculture has known, clear physical laws. The Quran says : “Fertile land yields (good) crop by the permission of its Persevere (Allah).” (7/58)


(1)   Imam Raghib Isfahani writes in his ‘Mufredaat’ that Ian differs from Ilm (knowledge) in that it also caries the sense of intention and planning on the part of the one have knowledge

iii)  The Rain-Cycle:   Obviously, certain physical laws govern the cycle of rain (artificial rain is now a reality).  The  Quran  says: “Don’t  they  ponder  upon  (the  fact)  that all things on earth are controllable by Man? And that vessels sail on sea according to set laws? And He holds clouds in the sky so that they rain down on earth only by His permission?” (22/65)

iv)  The Muslim fighters of holy wars had dedicated their lives to the cause of Allah. Their steadfastness to uphold their high principles and ideals provided them an edge over their enemies which was said in the Quran to make them ten times stronger than non-Muslims. And even if they are short of equipment and supplies they will still ‘overpower ten times their own number by Allah’s permission” (8/66). Clearly, Izn Allah here means the qualities necessary for success in war. This will always hold good. Hence, it is law. That’s why it said’ “A smaller group overpowers a larger group by Allah’s permission – and Allah favors the steadfast (saabereen).” (2/249)

A little further on, the Quran talks about the time when his army rode out to meet Goliath’s, Taloot prayed to Allah: “O Preserver! Give us plenty of steadfastness so that we don’t falter and make us victorious over the Rejecters (of your Din).” (2/250). Then it says: “Then they (Goliath’s men) were defeated by Allah’s permission.” (2/251)

v)   About acceptance or rejection of Allah’s message, the Quran says: “There is no compulsion in Din.” (2/256) And also; “The Truth from your Persevere (is here). So, accept it if you want or reject it if you so wish.” (18/29)

Acceptance / Rejection of Allah’s Message

An affectionate friend of humanity, the Prophet (Mohammad) desired people to see the truth. At times, he felt it so strongly that Allah advised him not to damage his health. Sura Younis talks about this situation when Allah said to the Prophet that it was easy for Allah to make Man follow the right path (as the rest of creation does). But, Man has been given the gift of free choice. Nonetheless, “You (the Prophet) want to force people onto the right path.” (10/99). Remember, “No one accepts (the right path) without Allah’s Izn!.”

Clearly, Izn in this verse cannot refer to order or permission because this will contravene not only 10/94 (it deprives Man of free will), but also the very basis of the Quranic philosophy. Therefore, in the verse in question, Izn means Allah’s law — no compulsion in acceptance or rejection of the Message. Exactly how Man employs the faculty of choice is made clear further in the verse: “Confused are those who do not employ reason (and rationality).” (10/100)

vi)  Sura Mojaadela talks about Islam’s enemies who are instigated by the Devil (Shaitaan) to plot conspiracies against the Muslims to demoralize them. But they should know that: “He (Shaitaan) cannot harm them even a little bit without Allah’s Izn.” (58/10). Very obviously, Izn here just cannot mean Allah’s permission or order. That will be ridiculous – Shaitan is the embodiment of defiance. Therefore, in this verse, Izn means Allah’s law. — the Muslims must abide by Allah’s law which will not allow any devilish force to work on them!. “The convinced (Muslims) depend (entirely and strongly) upon Allah (‘s law).” 58/10.

Let us now examine the verses which talk about no calamity befalling without Allah’s Izn.

No Calamity befalls Man without Allah’s Izn

In the battle of Uhud, the Muslims were on the verge of victory when a contingent of archers, going against their commander’s instructions, shifted from their position. This tactical mistake cost them dearly and they suffered heavy losses. Sura Aal-Imran narrates this episode:

“You were killing the enemy according to Allah’s law, were about to be victorious, and He was about to fulfill His promise to you. But, you faltered. You began to argue among yourselves over the situation and you disobeyed (your commander) and failed to wrest victory which was only moments away. Do you realize why it happened so? Some of you were taken over by short-term benefits while others preferred long-term advantages. Your attention was diverted away from the enemy (you were defeated) and it was made clear to you. (you realized your blunder, returned to your position, fought and achieved victory and thus) the ill effects of your mistake were erased. Allah’s law is that a mistake doesn’t banish one permanently from success. Whenever one realizes one’s mistake and returns to the right path, one benefits from Allah’s bounty anew.” (3/151)

Afterwards, when you pondered upon the setback with ‘ How did it happen?’, Allah’s reply to that was: “Tell, (them O Prophet!), that was from your own selves.” (3/165). In the light of all this, then, let us look again at verse (64/11) from Sura Taghaban — “No calamity befalls you but by Allah’s Izn.” This is followed by a few glittering words of wisdom:

Guidance through Law

“Whosoever is convinced of Allah (‘s law) has his heart guided (to the right path)” (64/11). That very clearly means that if one discovers and abides by, Allah’s law, one is guided rightly and thus can also foresee certain possibilities turning into probabilities.

Therefore, Izn Allah is meant to be Allah’s law in the Quranic perspective.

Note:   I have dealt with Izn Allah in principle. Various applications of the term shall be dealt with as we come across them later in the book

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


No other problem has given mankind more anxiety than the question of Good and Evil. Being an inseparable part of the bigger question of fate and destiny, this problem has been one of high priority for philosophers as well as people of religion. In this regard, the well-known dilemma attributed to St. Thomas Aquinas is:

If Evil exists by the will of God, He cannot be all good; and if Evil exists despite His will, He is not all powerful.

Since I have not set myself in this book the task of examining the question of destiny philosophically, I shall not trace the human intellectual endeavors in this regard. (1) It will be suffice to discuss it from the common man’s perspective.

Sensitive Dispositions

It is said that Gautum (Buddha), the crown prince of

a royal household, had a very sensitive and humane disposition. He noticed the norm of the strong controlling and oppressing the weak, both in the animal as well as the human world. He concluded that life was just a misery. Hence, it is to be shunned to the point of complete disinterest to achieve a state of freedom from life’s troubles (Nirvaan). Gautum’s philosophy has dominated Man’s thinking for almost 2,500 years!

(1) Interested readers may refer to my work “Insan nay Kya Socha” (What Man has Thought).

Disapproval of the Material World

The   principle  emanating  from   this

philosophy is that Matter is quagmire for the human soul. The span of worldly life must be spent to liberate the soul from its ‘imprisonment’. This can be done by shunning life —-  rejecting  pleasures,  refusing desires, and doing grueling body  (Yoga) exercises. That is MYSTICISM.


Indian philosophers noticing the social & economic inequality

in human societies, arrived at the notion of re-incarnation — one is rewarded or punished in life on the basis of one’s previous life. This was nothing more than the ancient  Greek  idea of ‘Transmigration of Soul’; the Indians have simply borrowed

Christianity’s ‘ORIGINAL SIN’

it. Some thinkers came to the thesis that Man

is intrinsically evil. Christianity formulated the concept of the original sin by Adam and Eve in Paradise. Therefore, Man, born with sin, must absolve himself through believing in Christ and Crucifixion.

Dualism of Magig

Persian  thinkers  theorized  about  two  universal  forces

eternally at war with one another – Ahrman (darkness) and  Yazdaan  (light). They are engaged in the struggle of good and evil. This theory of dualism, being the religion of the ancient Persian Magig, is attributed to Zoarastra. The very concept of two opposite warring forces is the origin of the theory of DIALECTISM of Hegel, the famous German philosopher. That, in turn, is the basis of the economic theories of Marx.

Shaupenhaur’s Pessimism

Yet another ideology claims the non-existence of

opposing forces, attributes like right / left, above / below, etc. Thus, only good exists. Contrary to this is Shaupenhaur’s  ideology of pessimism claiming that only evil exists. This echoes the Buddhist philosophy. Shaupenhaur fell a victim to pessimism as any intelligent but nervous person would. Yet another school of thought claims good and evil to be individual relative human impressions rather than real. For instance, a cyclone (or flood) coming to an uninhabited jungle is not termed ‘evil’ but it is very much so when it ravages a human settlement. Better still, a dark night is evil for the robbed but good for the robber.

These, then, are the various, confusing, conflicting human ideologies about good and evil. Let us now see what the Quran has to say on this intriguing question.

The Quranic Philosophy

About physical events, termed . natural evil’, the Quran says: “We have not created the skies and the earth and what is between them (the Universe), but rightfully (بالحـق)” (15/75). The many-faceted word Haq  here means something constructive. Contrarily, ‘باطل’ (wrong) means destructive. Therefore, the Quran pronounces the universe constructive (good) as a whole. It has been seen that there are countless FORCES OF NATURE at play according to Allah’s law. We have also seen that Man has the potential of discovering and harnessing those forces  – “Whatever is between the skies and the earth is rendered harnessable for you (all)” (45/13).  Until the discovery of physical laws governing a force (SCIENCE), it remains uncontrolled and destructive. It becomes constructive when harnessed. Many forces of Nature were awesomely destructive during Man’s infancy. They become constructively useful as they were gradually harnessed through scientific work. The Quran felicitates men who approach the Universe with a scientific mind and make discoveries and thus help probe the rightfulness of the Universe and its forces.


Sura Aal-e-Imran says:

“There are great signs of the Truth in the Universe and in the cycle of day & night for those who use their mental faculties wisely. That is, for those who keep in view Allah’s law in every facet of life, standing, sitting or even lying down; ponder deeply over the structure of the Universe and discover enough truth to say out loud: ‘O our Preserver! You haven’t produced (all) this wrongfully. You are too exalted to have produced it so. (It is our ignorance which brings calamities upon us). Grant us the potential to (discover and utilize the Universe through scientific application and thus) save ourselves from destruction (and calamities).’

Nations ignoring scientific work remain deprived of the good that there is; their actions go wasted; they remain down-trodden. Clearly, such people do not get help from any quarter!” (3/189-191).


The Quran terms such researchers as ULEMA (the knowledgeable)

(35/27-28).  Man’s  efforts  to  provide  practical  proof  for  ‘O our Preserver! You


haven’t  produced  (all)  this  wrongfully’ have harnessed

the hitherto awesomely destructive forces of Nature — and considered ‘evil’ — and have rendered them useful, constructive and ‘good’. Rain water is flood if not controlled but is a revitalizing life source when harnessed. Uncontrolled fire is another such force. Yet another example is a wide variety of poisonous creatures (snakes, scorpions, etc.) which are now a valuable source of antidotes.

The author’s own experience

I take the liberty of citing my own personal

experience in this regard. After I have had a successful surgical operation in 1964, I experienced an accidental hemorrhage. All the expert, sincere efforts of the physician (1) were in vain. I fainted. People around me, including the physician, gave up hope. My breath going, the doctor gave me an injection as a last resort. The bleeding stopped and I gradually came to, returning from the very edge of life. Later, the physician told me about the wonder-drug he had used. It was REPTILASE, an antidote made from snake poison! “O our Preserver! You haven’t created (all) this wrongfully!” By the way, my experience is not unique or extraordinary. A visit to a chemist’s can provide ample evidence of this phenomenon.

(1) My dear fried Dr. Syed Abdulwudood

Children born Deformed

It was ignorance which led people to believe that

babies are born deformed as punishment for sins of a previous life. Scientific research changed all that so much so that intending marriage partners in developed countries undergo routine medical check-ups. Constant medical care ensures that children are mostly born healthy. Medical research still goes on.

The Question of Pain

Pain in considered by some as the ultimate example of

evil. But medical experts point out the usefulness of the phenomenon of pair; it is actually the warning signals sent out by a body when it malfunctions. In the absence of pain, one would not be aware of a physical or physiological problem until it is too late. Pain is a blessing in disguise! (1)

The Right Measure

It is equally important for mankind to discover the correct

measure of substances for maximum benefit. A glass-full of water gives life; huge amounts of water causes death by drowning. Arsenic in minute quantities is revitalizing but kills in large doses. Use of substances in right quantity is of immense importance. It is so effectively proved by the Homeopathic system of medicine where treatment is based upon this principle of ‘the right dose’. Homeopathy is living proof of the maxim that all things in the Universe are essentially ‘good’. They become ‘evil’ when they are in the ‘wrong’ quantity’.

من شر ما خلق

This should explain clearly the Quranic verses (113/1-2).  One must

be careful of the evil in things. A thing becomes ‘good’  or  ‘evil’  according  to its use by Man.  Sura Aal-e-Imran   states  this   principal  in   (3/25)  to  say  Allah’s

Allah has created ‘Good’ alone

hand  has  ‘good’  alone  and  He  has


(1)     Pain is a crude phenomenon of  Nature, like many.  Scientific research is currently trying to find a          way of eliminating it altogether. George ……. Boehm hopes the research efforts to materialize in a  decade. (article published in the PAKISTAN TIMES of 24.1.1971, a Lahore, Pakistan daily newspaper).

measures / standards for all things. This principle reminds one of the verse (4/79) in Sura Nisa: The ‘good’ you get is from Allah and the ‘evil’ you get is of your own doing. Verse (4/78) says: “Say: Everything is from Allah”. (all actions bear results in accordance with Nature’s law). Also, in (28/60), it says: “Whatever (you) get from Allah is ‘good’ and permanent”. (if you follow Nature’s law, you will get good for ever). Sura Beni Israel says: “When We bless Man with Our bounties, he acts indifferent; when he is in problems, he is frustrated” (17/83; 41/51). Elsewhere, the Quran  says: “When We give Man a taste of bounty, he gets carried away. When he begets problems from his own doing, he gets depressed (and disappointed)” (30/36; 42/48). Sura Aaraaf says: “Fertile land yields well (by Allah’s law) whereas bad land not so well” (7/58).


So for we have discussed the physical universe and its properties. In the human world, however, good and evil demonstrate another diversion. A sword has  the basic property of  cutting  (throats),  but  the different motives  of  sword-wielding

The Purpose: Standard of Good & Evil

men  (a tyrant  and a champion of

the oppressed) produce opposing results in human society. Yet another example is the use of human faculty of mind which can be used either to deceive  or  to   safeguard against deception. The question, then, is  how to  determine  the  (good or

The purpose can only be determined by Wahi

evil) nature of an act in human

human social situations. Decidedly, human reason cannot provide the answer — it is simply impossible for it to be objective. The source beyond human reason is Allah’s Word which has already determined the standards of good and evil – the Permanent Values. When Man follows the permanent values established by Allah’s Message, good occurs. Otherwise, evil happens. A society negating permanent values (relying on human reason alone) is called the Wrong System (باطل) because it results in evil. Such a society utilizes the Universe according to human reason which is guided by human emotions which are really instincts inherited from Man’s animalistic phase (self preservation, self-aggression, etc.). Self-preservation, for example, on the group level, actually means preservation of one’s nation. It is not hard to imagine the chaos resulting from this attitude by various  nations  all over the globe. Mankind

The present day Hell

is currently going through the hell of nationalism and

the resulting chaos of selfish and ruthless human societies that we have today — “its sparks spread (all round)” (76/8). Ignoring permanent values results in division of mankind not only on the global but also on a national level. Rich and poor classes

Rich and Poor by Birth

poor classes are created and become permanent and

hereditary. A particular life-style is pre-decided for a child according to the social class it is born in. It is not surprising, by the way that Hindu clergy explained the socio-economic disparity of humanity through the philosophy of reincarnation.

Allah’s Will?

The  viewpoint  opposite  to  this  theory  attributed  the  social

differences to God who was the architect of Man’s socio-economic status – fate! Drummed up through ages, this ideology became one of the firm tenants of faith for the common man. This propaganda was deliberate. It aimed at keeping the masses ignorant of the real cause of socio-economic disparity — the unfair system established by the ‘haves’ (rulers, clergy, capitalists) to perpetuate their privileged social position to rule and control the multitudes of ‘have-nots’.

The Quran is a source of ‘good’

Let us now refer back to the verse which

attributes all good to Allah and all evil to Man. The permanent Values needed to achieve ‘good’ are preserved in the Quran. Sura An-Nahal says: “They (who oppose) ask those who adhere (to the system)” What has your Preserver sent down? They reply: ‘good’ ” (16/30). Thus, Allah is the source of ‘good’. So is the code of life (the Quran) given by him. Therefore, ‘good’ comes from Allah and ‘evil’ comes from Man! This is further explained in the same verse: “Those who are (true to permanent values of) ‘good’ in this life have good in the hereafter” (16/30). This brings to light another definition of ‘good’.

Good and Evil (Profit and Loss) can be quite clearly seen (as material gain and loss) in the realm of physical (animalistic) life. As such, nothing is permanently good or evil. That status changes under changing circumstances — milk is good if one is healthy but not when one is down with flue etc.; (a glass of) water is good but (a pitcher-full of it is) evil under other condition. Therefore, good and evil are relative (not absolute).

At  the  human  level  of  life,   however,   Good   and  Evil   have  a   different

Absolute Good and Evil

standard i.e.  good  is  which develops and integrates

the human personality; evil is that disintegrates and damages it, since the human personality is non-physical, too. For instance, the Evil in poison can be readily observed, but the Evil is falsehood in beyond observation. The standard of Good and Evil for the human personality, therefore is the Permanent Values (Morality). Morals are exclusive to Man. They are non-existent in the rest of the Animal Kingdom. Morality has no basis in a society which does not accept the existence of the human personality. Such a (materialistic and secular) society has social and / or legal laws which keep the social fabric intact. Generally, such laws are  erroneously referred to as morals – lying, cheating, etc. In essence, however, they are social rules not moral code. For example, a person in a secular (materialistic) society will think (1) nothing of lying if it is beneficial and can go undetected by the society’s law-enforcing apparatus. Contrarily, a person who accepts the existence of the human personality does not lie under any circumstances. Such abstention from falsehood aims at preserving the integrity of the human personality. That is morality. From the Quranic perspective, the definition of a person of high moral character (the best behavior) is: ‘The one who rejects material benefits in order to preserve permanent values (to benefit one’s personality)’. As against the materialistic (secular) societies, the code of morality for   the  human  personality  are  permanent.  Adhering   to  this  code  generates absolute Good, ignoring it results in absolute Evil, i. e., for example:

(i)         fraud will always be evil,

(ii)        fraud will always be evil, whatever its nature of gravity,


(1)        ‘Conscience’ is just the code of behavior learnt during early years of a child. It varies from one society to another, one time to another.

(iii)       fraud will always be evil, regardless of changing times or circumstances.

Permanent Values (pertaining to the human personality) are permanent, unchanging and absolute.

Since the concept of permanent values is non-existent in a ‘wrong’ (non-Quranic) society, a member of it who tries to adhere to and follow such values often incurs material losses. In the face of such a clash, mysticism suggests rejection of the (material) world as the way out. This attitude is self-deceptive. One just cannot ignore the world one lives in. The Quran’s suggestion under such circumstances is to create a society on the basis of Permanent Values – to ensure good for one’s body “حسنات الدنيا” (the worldly benefits) as well as for one’s personality “حسنات الآخرة”  (the benefit of hereafter).

Therefore, the Absolute Good, according to the Quran, is that which provides good in the physical as well as the personal realm. The opposite is, of course, Absolute Evil.

The meaning of verse (16/30) of Sura Nahal should now be very clear which talks about “حسنة الدنيا”  and “خير” in the hereafter. Such a social system is termed ad-Deen by the Quran. To summarize what we have said so far:

The Materialistic (secular) concept of life caters only for the physical side of Man.   Ad-Deen opposes this.

Mysticism advocates rejection of the physical side of Man.  Ad-Deen opposes this, too.

Ad-Deen (the Quranic ) concept of life caters for the physical as well as the personal side of Man.  This is absolute Good.

This Absolute Good is achievable through conviction (إيمان) and proper deeds (تقوى), or in other words, by having unshakable trust in Allah and the human personality and leading a life according to Permanent Values. Sura Baqara says: “ If they become convinced and lead a proper life, they’ll get Good from Allah. Only if they knew!” (2/103). Such people have been called abraar (ابرار) in (3/198), i. e., those who enjoy the bounties of (the physical) life as well as of (the human) personality. Sura Nahal asks the convinced not to ‘sell’ (ignore) a permanent value for material benefits, if they want to have Good from Allah, (16/95).

The not-so-convinced prefer the material gain in a clash of values. This misconception is mentioned in Sura Baqara: “It may be that you ignore what is actually good for you and want what is actually evil. Allah knows and you know not” – (don’t depend upon your own knowledge of good and evil. Go by Allah’s knowledge) – (2/216).

The most difficult time in a clash of material and permanent values is when it involves losing one’s life. This is termed as Jihaad (or Qitaal). On such an occasion, the Quran asks the convinced to readily offer life because ‘That is good for you if you (really know’ (9/41). Men cannot sometime see the truth because material benefits are readily achievable and the Good takes a while in materializing. Such men are hasty (17/11).

Self assessment

A  clash  between  physical  interests  and  those  of  the

personality is the time for one to not only test oneself of one’s conviction but also to spur oneself on the path of Ad-Deen. This is termed as iblaa by the Quran. The ultimate testing time comes with potential death during such clashes (21/35; 67/2). This is why the Quran wants one to always exclusively adhere to Ad-deen. A complete negation of permanent vales, therefore, is more destructive because of a complete lack of knowledge of real good and evil.

Summary:  Good and Evil are results of Man’s actions alone. If he employs his capabilities to deal with Nature in accordance with Permanent Values, Good results. Otherwise, Evil is produced. Nature’s Law of Deeds decides on Man’s success and failure to the last iota (99/8-9; also: 2/110; 2/215; 27/89; 28/80; 73/20). Allah has NOT pre-decided success (good) or failure (evil) for Man. What He has pre-determined is the Law both for the physical and the personal aspects (in this life as well as in the hereafter).


The Quran has also used the terms nafa (gain) and zarar (loss) for khair (good) and shar (evil), respectively.

Early Man’s ignorance and fright of awesome Nature (referred to earlier in this book) made him bow and plead to Nature for mercy. This need of achieving benefit and avoiding disaster from Nature was the origin of deities and the practice of worship. The Quran put the forces of Nature in their right place, controllable by Man and thus, not worthy of worship. “They worship those (other than Allah) who do not (have the power to) benefit or damage them (people)” – (25/55 – Also: 5/77, 6/17, 6/71, 10/18, 10/106, 21/66, 22/12, 48/11). These forces do not  enjoy  such  powers  even over their own selves (25/3, 13/6). Next to gods

Not Even Exalted Men

and goddesses people believed certain exalted men

had that sort of a power. To Muslims, no one is, or can be, more highly-placed than the Rasul (messenger) ‘Mohammed’. The Quran told him to announce: “tell them: I do not possess (the power) to either benefit or damage (even) my own self!” (7/188, 10/49).

Nonetheless, some men do cause harm to others. This is explained in (58/10)  where  it  attributes  such  occurrences  to  Allah’s  izn  (laws).  One  must safeguard

Men harming other men

oneself against such evil men. Suar Aale Imran: “if

you are steadfast and adhere to Allah’s laws, no plot of them (enemies) can harm you” (3/119). Elsewhere, it says: “Had the inhabitants of these settlements been convinced of Allah’s laws and adhered to them, they would have been showered upon by bounties of the sky and the earth. But they rejected those laws and they were apprehended because of their own deeds” (7/96). Therefore, harm comes to Man due to his own actions – “If you keep on the right track, no one can hurt you” (5/105).

Nevertheless,  as is our everyday experience, good and fair people do get a

The Solution

Bad deal in society. Its solution? Simply to replace the entire

social set-up with the system based upon Allah’s laws. Thus, His laws will benefit Man. That is why such acts by Man are attributed to Allah. Sura An’aam says: “If you are hurt by Allah (‘s law), the only respite is from Allah (‘s laws) as He has established measures for everything” (6/17, 10/107), also: 39/38).

One Important Point

Allah attributes to Himself the good deeds done (according to Allah’s laws) by Man. This  very important  point  needs  further  elaboration. Refer to the Battle of

The Battle of Bedr

Bedr where the holy fighters (who had already been called

Allah’s Party) were told: “It was Allah killing them, not you”, and also that “you did not shoot arrows at them. Allah did” (8/17).

Similarly, on the occasion of the Accord at Hudaibiya, Muslims repeated to the ‘Rasul Allah’ (the messenger)  the oath under which they had sold their wealth and persons to Allah (9/111), it is referred to as: “Those who were making an agreement with you (O Rasul!) did in actual effect made it with Allah!” At the time of the oath-taking ceremony, “Allah’s hand was there above your hand!” (48/10).

Suffice to say, then, that whatever occurs in accordance with Allah’s laws is attributed to Allah Himself. This is how ‘Rasul Allah’ Ibraheem  said, “(Allah is) who created me and then guided me (onto the right path), the one who satisfies my hunger and thirst, and cures me of any illness, and the one who will give me death and will revive me” (26/78-81).

Not only the universal events but also the potential and actions of humans is attributed to Allah. Sura Ar-Rahman: “Allah created Man and taught him to speak” (55/3-4). Elsewhere it says: “The One who taught him the use of the pen” (96/4). Sura Maaeda says: “(Those animals) which you train (to hunt) as Allah has trained you” (5/4).

All this goes to say that the Quran attributes directly to Allah whatever occurs or is done in accordance with His laws through the potential given to Man by Him. Some of these points will be elaborated later in this book.

Shaitaan (Devil) – Iblees

Shaitaan / Iblees (the Devil) is just another excuse for Man’s actions. Let us briefly examine Shaitaan.

We have so far seen that:

1.           Man is born with animalistic instincts (emotions or drives) as well as intellect (which serves to fulfill those drives).

2.           Life at the human level requires observance of ‘permanent values’.

3.           In case of a clash between an animalistic instinct and a permanent value, one of the following two happens:

a)  the permanent value triumphs and intellect works to serve its cause.

b)  the instinct triumphs and intellect works to serve the instinct’s cause.

In case of 3 (b) above, Man’s emotions no longer work under a permanent value and therefore are referred to as rebellious intellect. The Quran refers to these unbridled emotions as ‘Shaitaan’. Linguistically, it is considered to be derived from the Arabic root-words ‘شاط  ‘ or ‘يشيط ‘ (to flare up). This is my preferred explanation of the term although some take the word to have been derived from Hebrew (meaning ‘the hinderer’) – forces which hinder the progress of permanent values.

Psychologically, when a person is overcome by his / her unbridled emotions (animalistic instincts), it gives rise to aggression (a desire to dominate others), and he / she behaves irrationally. When emotions cool off, he / she repents and frustration sets in.

The word ‘Iblees’ is a derivative of the Arabic root b-l-s which means, to be frustrated. To the Quran, ‘Shaitaan’ and ‘Iblees’ are two sides of the same coin — unbridled emotions resulting in frustration.

Therefore, ‘Shaitann’ / ‘Iblees’ is nothing but Man’s own emotions. Also, emotions and intellect are neither good nor evil. It is how they are used which makes them so.

Incidentally, Islam (the Quran) values human intellect and emotion very highly. They are gifts of nature and Allah is a source of Good alone. Nothing of His creations can be intrinsically evil. But the ancient Persian philosophy of the Magus (Zoarstrians) did precisely that by pronouncing ‘aharman’ (Shaitaan) to be intrinsically evil  and  to  exist  without   Man   and to be at odds with ‘Yazdaan’ (the

The Concept of Compulsion

God).  The   idea   of  Shaitaan   being   as   an

independent creature was used by the irresponsible to create the notion of compultion, i. e., all Man’s evil deeds are instigated by Shaitaan (an entirely separate from and independent of Man). Please refer, at this point, to our observation earlier in this book when Iblees disobeyed Allah one the basis of being under compulsion (having no choice and thus not being responsible for his actions). In other words, refusing to accept responsibility for one’s action is a characteristic of Shaitaan / Iblees.

Let us  now  turn  to  the  Quran   to  see its view of  Shaitaan and Man. With

The Quranic View

regards to the story of Man it figuratively says: “Then

Shaitaan (led) them both to evil apprehensions” (7/20). Sura Q (ق ) says: “And We have created Man and We know what evil suggestions his own self makes (to him)” (50/16). It is clear that ‘Shaitaan’ is nothing but Man’s own self. In the battle of Uhud some (hypocrites) abandoned their station out of greed. The Quran refers to them thus: “Shaitaan made them falter because of their own actions” (3/154). We have also seen that, overcome by emotions, Man loses balance of mind — Sura Yasin says: “You let Shaitaan (emotions) overcome you and thus your reason was paralyzed and you ended up in hell” (36/60-62). Sura Ibrahim narrates an imaginary dialogue between Shaitaan and its followers on the Day of Judgment. The wrongdoers blame Shaitaan for their evil deeds. Shaitaan rejects the charge by telling them that he did not exercise any control over them – he just suggested; the deeds were done by people themselves. Therefore, “Don’t you blame me. Blame yourselves” (16/22).

—————————— x – x – x – x ————————–

The burning question, then, is how may Man avoid being overpowered by his own emotions?

How Man can avoid being controlled by his  own  emotions

Mysticism suggests crushing one’s emotions through  strict  self denial. But this is as impractical as its other suggestion  of  denial   of  this   world.  Human   emotions

cannot be crushed into silence. Any attempts to do so is unwise. Emotions, like Reason, are an asset. The freshness, the variety and the colorfullness of human life springs from desires, which, in turn, are caused by emotions. The Quran’s guidance regarding human emotions is, literally as well as figuratively, out of this world! In (45/23), it says: “Do you see the one who takes his own emotions as his god? Allah(‘s law) makes him go astray, despite having knowledge (and reason); (it is as if) his ears and heart are sealed shut and he is blindfolded. Who else but Allah can help him onto the right path?” Such people are misled because “One who follows one’s emotions disregarding Allah’s guidance, goes astray” (28/50). It is clear, therefore, that human emotions are evil when they are uncontrolled and good if guided by Allah’s law.  This  was  illustrated  by the ‘Rasul Allah’ when he said that

The Muslim Iblees (Shaitaan)

every person has their own Iblees. Asked if he

himself had one, the ‘Rasul Allah’ said, ‘Yes, I do. But I have converted my Iblees to Islam.’ Iblees (Shaitaan) is nothing but human emotions is also illustrated in the allegorical story of Man’s birth. Expelled from Paradise,  after Iblees having refused

Iblees is controllable

to  bow  in  obedience  to  Man vowed to mislead Man

(17/62-63). Allah responded to this challenge by saying: “People who follow Me will not come under your control” (17/65). “In fact, he (Iblees) will have no control over people who are convinced (of the truthfulness of Allah’s law) and depend upon and trust their Allah. His control will only work on those who ignore Allah (‘s laws) either completely or partially” (16/99-100). Men convinced of Allah’s law shut Shaitaan out of their minds so that: “If a wandering thought of Shaitaan touches them, they remember (and remind themselves of Allah’s law) and thus they can see more clearly” (7/201). This is illustrated in the story of ‘Rasul’ Yousef’ (Joseph in theBible) where he refused to be enticed by the wife of his Egyptian  master.  Yousef

Yousef’s example

practically demonstrated that Shaitaan fails to overcome

the Convinced —  “Surely, he was one of Our pure (of heart) people” (12/64).

A question  can  arise  at  this  point.  One  may ask why have this constant

Why the   tussle of good  and    evil

tussle of good and evil at all? The answer is simple. This clash of  good  and  evil   is a logical consequence of Man’s

freedom of choice. Freedom of choice cannot exist if there is only one possibility. The moment of choice is the occasion where Man’s potential is brought into play. This Universe operates on the principle of Evolution which is based upon clash. Life is like a stream which accelerates when it clashes with falls of stones. Only a plectrum can release the dormant notes of a harp. A sword is sharpened by ‘struggling against’ the whetting stone. A spark is produced by a flint only when it rubs against a stone. Similarly, clash with evil brings out the good in Man. This is known as ‘the development of his self (personality). Shaitaan provides this essential clash which is so necessary for Man’s development. The Quran refers to this tussle: “… We strike wrong (Evil) with (the hammer of) Right till it (Evil) is smashed into retreat “ (21/18). In the social world, Good can triumph over Evil very swiftly if Allah’s law is implemented. Evil keeps resisting Good; that is the work of Shaitaan:  “They establish a system of justice based upon Evil. They were ordered not to do it. This the very thing Shaitaan wants – to lead them to the farthest wrong path!” 4/60).

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed

IF ……….. THEN
(In the Quran)

Earlier in this book, LAW has been defined as: If…. Then….. always. If (you do this) then (this will) always (happen).

Judicial Law

Law has been familiarly categorized as judicial, physical

(natural) and permanent values. Judicial laws show no intrinsic interdependence. Take, for the sake of argument, a law stating a term in prison  or a fine for committing an act of theft. If a particular judiciary doesn’t consider theft a crime, or the culprit is not apprehended, the act of theft will fail to produce a result. This interdependence between an act and its result is the reason for different societies being able to have different changeable laws.

Physical Law

Social norms are no different. Physical (natural) laws on the

other hand, display an intrinsic interdependence between an act and its result. No social or judicial ruling can ever affect the result (burns, for example) of an act (putting one’s hand in fire). These laws are simply there in Nature. They are permanent, and come true to the definition of law at the head of this chapter.

Permanent Values

The  third  category  of  laws  (permanent values) i. e., if

you don’t improve the lot of the poor and needy, you’ll be destroyed – give the result of an act just like the first two classes. But they are different in many respects. They are permanent as well as natural (established by Allah). These divine laws are give to Man through Revelation. They have a twofold result — betterment of society as well as development of personality (of individuals). One can accept the validity of permanent values only if one accepts the existence of human personality. It follows that establishing these values in a human society depends upon Imaan (acceptance of human personality and revelation of these divine values). The Quran has highlighted the social as well as personal advantages of permanent values. For instance, fornication is considered to be a violation of value resulting in degeration of personality;  (25/68) at the same time it has been proposed as a social criminal act worthy of punishment. (100 lashes in public).

Law & its Philosophy

The  Quran   tells  us  that  both ‘the book’ (law) and

hikma (the why of it) are divinely given. No law can be effective without its philosophy (the ‘then’ in the original definition of If … then …. Always). This is precisely what happen in anarchic situations in human societies. Similarly when

Din   &      Mazhab

(The system & Religion)

‘alDin’ (an effective legal system) is reduced to ‘Mazhab’   (or  religion —– a set of rituals),   laws

become ineffective – they bear no results. People go through the motions to ‘please’ God. But in ‘alDin’ laws are effective in that they bear results and the ‘then’ of them is always manifested in this world as well as in the hereafter. The ‘hikma’ of these laws makes it easy to check if actions are according to the laws. ‘Mazhab’ has not such provision – people do certain acts and leave the result to Allah, not knowing if they will bear results or not. Consequently, there is nothing (concrete results) to check them against. The Quran refers to such fruitless actions as (حبطت أعمالهم) : ‘their actions were wasted’.

Let me summarize what we have discussed so far. I apologize for any repetition it may bring, but I wish to drive here a very important point. The very definition of Law (If … then …. Always) indicates freedom of choice. The choice of ‘If’ can only be give to one with a free will. We cannot, for example say to a blind person: ‘If you don’t look where you go, you will trip over and fall’. The question of ‘looking’ for the blind doesn’t arise. The Quran uses the expression ‘ف00000إن’ (If … then) as well as (لعلكم) (so that). Let us cite some examples from the Quran which illustrate Man’s free will.

Some Examples from the Quran :

1.      Conviction and good deeds will definitely get you into ‘Paradise’ (2/25).

2.      If you follow My instructions, you will be free of fear and depression (2/38).

If you spend your wealth in Allah’s way, you will be free of fear and depression (2/262, 2/274, 2/277, 6/48, 46/13).

3.      If you follow the Book in parts and deny some other parts of it, you will have a miserable life here and get severely punished in the hereafter (2/85).

4.      If these people had accepted and adopted a careful life, they would have received the best return (2/103).

5.      If you remember, and not forget, My laws, I will give you an increase in respect and status (2/152).

6.      It would have been better for the people of the Book if they had accepted the Quran (3/109).

7.      If you are Momin (convinced), you will triumph (3/138).

8.      If you die, or are killed, in Allah’s way, you will get His protection and care (3/156).

9.      No one will overpower you if you have Allah’s support (3/159). Allah’s support is given to one who rises to work for His ‘din’ (22/40), (47/7).

10.    If you accept and lead a careful life, you will be rewarded highly (3/178).

11.    If you keep away from blunders, your flaws will be removed (4/31).

12.    If the people of the Book’ has accepted and led a careful life, We would have removed their troubles (5/65). If they had followed Allah’s Word, they would have had plentiful food (5/66). They would have enjoyed bounties of all universe (7/96).

13.    Whoever accepts, and remains fair, gets peace and is guided towards prosperity (6/83).

14.    If you lead a careful life, you will have distinctive life (8/29).

15.    If twenty fighters (in Allah’s way) are steadfast, you will triumph over two hundred of enemy – it is when you have the same supply and provision of arms. If you are less equipped, you will overcome an enemy double in number than you (8/65-66).

16.    ‘Imaan’ (Acceptance by conviction) and ‘taqwaa’ (watchful life) are harbinger of good news of good life here and in the hereafter. This is Allah’s firm law and will never change (10/62-64).

17.    Whoever strives in Our Way (to uphold alDin), We will show them the way (29/69).

18.    Whoever is steadfast after ‘Imaan’, will have angels descending with good news of being free of fear and depression here and in the hereafter (41/30-31).

19.    ‘Imaan’ and good deeds result in inheritance of earth (political sovereignty) (24/55).

20.    If you shy away from Allah’s laws, you will be replaced by another people (47/38; 9/38).

21.    Whoever shuns Our laws will face a shortage of livelihood.

22.    If you are thankful (use Allah’s bounties according to His laws) you will prosper. Otherwise, you will be punished (14/7).

23.    Whoever gives to others and leads a careful life will have an easy life (92/6-10).

24.    Be steadfast, galvanized and lead a watchful life, so that you succeed (3/199).

25.    The children of Israel were punished with misery and oppression because they had denied and rejected Allah’s laws.

The above examples should vividly display that Allah has given free will to Man to choose from two possibilities. Man is free to choose one of the two paths but is NOT free to choose the destination (result). This fact (law) is unchangeable. This permanent law (value) is taqdeer — the natural result of Man’s actions. We can say, therefore, that:  When Allah decrees, and tells us its result as well, that is a permanent law.

Islam is Al-Din  which has laws. The word ‘din’ literally means law. Allah’s laws – permanent values – are unchangeable and are given in Allah’s Book, the Quran.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed

How did it all happen?

The Quranic verses presented so far in this book should establish, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that:

i)            the Universe operates under laws set by Allah, and

ii)           Man is a responsible being who enjoys freedom of choice of right and wrong. He can choose an action but has to bear its consequence (pre-ordained by Allah). This is the Law of Results of Action, which is constant and firm. ‘Ye shall reap what ye shall sow’ is the fundamental basis of life.

Our Current (Muslim) Beliefs

Contrary  to this, we  have  been  repeatedly

told by parents, friends, teachers, religious scholars, mystics etc., and  read in the various interpretations of the Quran, compilations of Hadith (Traditions of Mohammed), early Islamic literature etc., that:

Not a leaf stirs or Man moves without God’s consent. Every event in the Universe occurs only when God allows. Man cannot interfere in the function of the Universe. Not only that, Man has absolutely no control over his own affairs. Each and every event in one’s life is pre-destined even before one’s birth. Destiny is unchangeable. God is omnipotent and owns absolute power and will. At his own sweet will, He bestows  poverty or affluence, honor or disgrace, health or sickness, life or death, and change of fortune etc. No human effort can affect a change in fate. Therefore, men should unflinchingly accept their destiny pre-ordained by God. The more docile and accepting a man, the closer to God he is!

The question, then, is how did such contradictory beliefs came to stay as ‘Islamic ideology’ despite the Quran being there in its original form all along? How did such a fundamental change occur?

The importance and the magnitude of the problem necessitates a thorough and deep examination of it.

The question of Destiny has been treated in Islamic literature much more than any other. Almost every religious work on Islam deals with it because taqdeer has been made one of the requisites of one’s ‘iman’ (conviction) —  I shall deal with it later in this book. All the writings on the question (treating it partly or wholly) have only complicated the already confusing situation. The reason for this aggravation was that those treatises were based not on the Quran but on philosophy and logic not remotely connected with the Holy Book. I do not propose to dwell on such writings not only because of their immense volume  but  also  because  of   their  being   largely   incomprehensible  to   the

The Old Scholastic Philosophy is Futile Today

average man. The archaic

style of writing and the approach to issues through scholastic philosophy is useless in the modern age and the changed attitude of men to life. Fore example, Imam Ibn Hazam Andalusi, one of the most prominent early Muslim authors, has treated the question of fate and destiny in his famous ‘alMilal waalNahal’. He opens the discussion thus:

Those who believe that action comes with ability have said that the question is: Does a ‘kaafir’ (dissenter) possess the ability of ‘imaan’ (conviction) which he has been ordered, or does he not? They have replied that: A kaafir has the ability of imaan as a replacement, i. e., he will not have dissent for ever but will replace it with imaan.

The desirable answer is: He, with his good limbs and high obstacles, is apparently able to simultaneously have dissent and imaan along as he stays a kaafir. He will remain unable unless God helps him. He can act when he is helped and thus becomes able. Now it can be said that has been made to do what he did.

I am sure one cannot gain anything from this discussion which takes up hundreds of pages! Sadly, this is the style and mode of most of the Islamic literature which is even till today taught to students of religion.

History is undependable

Who introduced anti Quranic views and how

did they come to be the very basis of Islamic ideology? Naturally, it is a question for History to answer. It is bound to come as a shocking surprise to many of my readers that, sadly, the early Islamic history is utterly unreliable from the academic and technical point of view. Since it is outside the scope of this book, I shall very briefly present the reasons for the situation:

i)       The very first documented history,  considered by Muslims as authentic as well as the source of all history, is the one authored by Imam Tabri. It consists of thirteen volumes. This work was compiled nearly 300 years after Mohammed. It was based not on any documented record but, by Tabri’s own testimony, on oral tradition. Such a work is obviously not very reliable. Later, all historical account were based on Tabri’s work. That is why it is know as ‘the mother of histories’.

ii)      Only a neutral and objective account of events can be a true reflection of an era. Muslim history was compiled at a time when the Muslim community had already split into several sects. Therefore, all literature produced during that period could not be entirely free of sectarian philosophy and influences. The question of taqdeer, among others, has become one of the basis for sectarianism. That is why Abu Zahra Masri (Egyptian) thinks that today it is difficult even to establish the founder of the ‘fate doctrine’.

In ‘al-Mazaheb allslamia’ (the Muslim Sects), he writes:

“(when) A sect becomes an established group it is very difficult to

ascertain its original founder. Hence, it is not easy to establish the

birth of that sect.”

iii)     We (Muslims) have since long adopted as firm belief the idea that all ancestral personalities, and literature attributed to them, is beyond and above criticism – it tantamounts to disrespect. Our children are taught the maxim:    …………………

(It is a mistake to point out a mistake of ancestors).

Under the circumstances, not many dare cast a critical look at early Muslim literature.

The Correct Attitude to History

Having thus established  the unreliability of

early Muslim history, I must point out that the events and accounts pertaining to Mohammed and his companions referred to in the Quran must be considered as authentic and true. This logically follows the authenticity of the Quran. The correct approach to really Muslim history, therefore, should be that: accounts of history in contravention of the Quranic evidence must be rejected as factually wrong; events supported by the Quran must be accepted as fact. Events and accounts not mentioned in the Quran cannot be thus tested. Since the question of taqdeer has been dealt with by the Quran, we can test the later-day beliefs and ideas against the Quran for their validity.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

The Quranic  stand  on  taqdeer   has  already been  presented.  One  can  find

The Idea of Compulsion at the Dawn of Islam

reference in the Quran to

the people of the time who believed in the idea of compulsion. Sura Anaam says: ‘The polytheists will say that if Allah so willed, we wouldn’t have been polytheists nor our ancestors nor we would have adopted certain prohibitions….’ (6/149). The Quran pronounces them as rejecters of truth. (16/35, 43/20).

Sura Yaseen says: ‘And when they are asked to use their wealth to feed the hungry, the dissenters (Kaafirs) say to the Convinced (momeneen) that Allah would have provided food to the hungry if He so willed. Their hunger is Allah’s will. How can we go against His will and provide food to them?’ (36/47).

The Quran says that they are clearly misled.

This shows that, even in Mohammed’s time, there were people who believed in the concept of compulsion. The Quran rejected  this view and replaced it with its positive stand. The problem of fate and pre-destiny was solved beyond the shadow  of a  doubt. It has  been  reported  that Omar asked a thief why he had

Punishment for the Compulsion concept

committed thievery. He replied.

‘It was God’s will.’ Omar sentenced him to the legal punishment for stealing and extra lashes on top of it. He explained, ‘The standard sentence is for stealing. The lashes are for attributing something false to Allah’  — (Al-Mazaaheb Al-Islamia by AbuZahra Masry. P-139 – Urdu Translation).

The concept of Compulsion could not gain a foothold in the Muslim world as long as the Quran remained the basis of their ideology. It could not have because the Quran so clearly and categorically declared it polytheistic and dissenting (kufr). But when the Quran  was pushed into the background and the watchful eye of the central authority of the Caliphate (the righteous successors of Mohammed) was no more, the Muslim mind was infiltrated and polluted by various anti-Quranic concepts. The question of taqdeer was but one of them. One report says that the very first sect of Islam, formed on the basis of ideology, was the Jabariya (the Compulsionists)!

Before the advent of Islam, the people of Arabia consisted mainly of nomadic desert tribes living on dates as shepherds. They were sandwiched by the age-old glorious kingdoms of Iran and Byzantiam. Firdausi’s ‘Shahnama’ is a testimony to the Iranian’s degrading attitude towards the Arabs. These very ‘lowly’ Arabs, after having adopted Islam, ran over and captured the vast Iranian empire. The defeated and overpowered Iranians could not accept the humiliation and kept the fires of revenge raging in their hearts. They knew that the reason for the Arabs’ newly-found might was their newly-adopted philosophy of life (Islam).  Hormazan, a captive governor from Iran, was brought

Harmazan’s testimony

to Median. Omar asked him for his thoughts over the

incredible defeat of Iran by a handful of Arabs who were considered too low in the Iranian eye even to enter a battle with. Hormazan’s response was very significant. He said, “Previously it was Iran against the Arabs, Now, it is Iran against the Arabs and their Allah!”

Truly, ‘the Arabs’ Allah’ was the secret of their success. It had meant a revolutionary change in their minds and hearts which gave them the will and enthusiasm to work to establish, and even die for, a higher purpose of life. Such sentiments make a people invincible. The Persians and Byzantians both know this well. Therefore, they began working towards distancing the Arabs from this philosophy.

– – – x – x – x – x – x – x – – –

The dawn of Islam  was  also a severe blow to the obliterated religions of

A Conspiracy by Christians & Jews

Christianity and Judaism. Furthermore,

the growing might of the Arabs not only shook the very foundations of the Byzantian Empire, it also caused the Jews to be driven out of the Arabian peninsula. Therefore, the Christians and the Jews, as well as the Persians, had reasons to be revengeful against the Arabs. They, too, had the same purpose and adopted the same scheme of operations, to alleviate the Arabs from their revolutionary philosophy of the Quran. The way to achieve it was simply to infiltrate and pollute this philosophy much in the way their own systems (Christianity & Judaism)  had  already  been  before. Thus,  Iqbal  uses the term

Arab & Ajam

‘ajam’ not only for the Persians. It includes all non Arab groups.

His term ‘Arab Islam’ refers to the system of the Quran and ‘ajami Islam’ refers to all the anti-Quranic ideas and concepts from Zoarastrianism (the Magus), Christianity and Judaism etc. which found their way into the Islamic philosophy. That is how this divine system of Allah was transformed into the man-made religion which has been with us till today.

The distortion of Islam started with the Persians tampering with and obliterating the question of taqdeer. Zoarastriansim was based upon the problem of Good and Evil. The Persians were well aware of the impact of this concept. They knew that a group which believes in Man’s free will and his ability to shape his destiny attains great powers. The obvious way to render a group powerless is to make them reject Man’s free will, and believe in pre-destiny. Hence the distortion of Islamic ideology was begun with this particular question of taqdeer. It is a woeful tale, the death knell of the true (Quranic) Muslim Philosophy.

Asaawra  was a  group  of  Persian nobility and politicians who served as

The Asaawra of Islam

advisors  to  the  emperors  much  in  the way of the

‘nauratan’ of the famous Mughal emperor Akbar the Great of India. These imperial aides wore a gold bangle (السوار) as a symbol of distinction. Hence the term  ‘asaawra’ for the group. (Incidentally, the Quran has used this simile of ‘gold bangles’ for the inhabitants of Paradise to symbolize their high and prestigious status).

After their defeat, the Persian army in general, and the asaawara in particular, offered Saad bin Waqqas, the Arab conqueror of Persia their conversion to Islam if accorded full Muslim rights including the right of abode in the Muslim settlements. Their wish was granted and the Persians immigrated to cities like Kufa and Basra. Today it is difficult to ascertain the reasons and motives behind this permit but, in hindsight, one tends to see it as unwise. The reason is simple. Persia, being the cradle of an ancient civilization, had several characteristics of an obliterated way of life and an ideology gone astray. Institutions like imperialism, capitalism and priesthood were their firm beliefs. Their religion was based upon the concepts of the Magus. Their intellectuals, particularly the asaawara, were masters of discussion on topics like philosophy of logic, theology and metaphysics, etc.

Arabs, on the other hand, had a life and mind as simple and unpolluted as the desert they inhabited. They had not been exposed to political maneuvering, theoretical discussion, or the intricacies of philosophy and logic. The ‘din’ (system of the Quran), which had elevated them to a position of distinction in the world, was a clear and simple one. It had a few clearly laid out concepts, The Arabs had drawn their power from that simple, pure and clear system.

It is easy  to  see,  then,  the  consequences  of  such  a clear-headed and simple  group  intermingling  with  the Persians who came with a deliberate plan (1). The simple-minded Muslims were no match to the seasoned craft of the Persians.

(1)      A few years earlier, this intermingling had had a catastrophic result. Hormazan, a Persian governor, along with his companions, was permitted to settle down in Medina. They conspired and assassinated Omar, a blow from which Islam has never recovered.

Settling down among the Muslims, the Persians began to propagate their own ideas very subtly. The  very  first  Muslim  to  raise  the  question of destiny was

Ma’abad bin Khalid Jahanni, who  had  adopted  it from Abu Younis – one of the Asaawra. From Ma’abad the idea passed on to Gheelan Damashqi who propagated it  further.  According  to  the  concept,  Man is completely devoid of

Influence of Christianity

free   will  with  his  fate  pre-determined. The

exponents of this concept are referred to as the Jabariya (the compulsionists).

The belief of Compulsion was also the foundation of Christian philosophy. The most bright illustration is the Christian belief of the original sin. (that Man is sinful by nature and nothing can absolve Man of the original sin committed by Adam and Eve). Also, according to the Bible, Christ’s last wish was: ‘God! Let thine be done not mine’. That was the foundation of the resigned-to-fate attitude. It has been reported that Gheelan Damashqi, an original Copt (Christian), adopted this view from a Christian who had converted to Islam before reverting to his original faith. The concept of dualism of Good and Evil was there in Judaism, too. During the period of bondage under Babylon, the Israelites came into contact with the Persians near the Iranian-controlled areas. Later, their liberation and subsequent return to their homeland happened largely due to the help of the Persians. Naturally, they were impressed by the Zoroastrians from who they adopted the concept of Good & Evil dualism. The fact that the Jews were already interested in metaphysical philosophy only served to hasten the process of Jews being influenced by the Persian thought. (The famous Jewish seat of learning at Alexandria was a center for philosophical studies).

Another historical account cites, as the founder of the concept of Compulsion, Ja’ad bin Dasham, a Muslim who had adopted the idea from a Syrian Jew. From Dasham, the idea passed on to Jaham bin Safwan, a native of Khorasan (in Persia), who propagated it so vigorously that the Jabariya came to be known as the Jahmiya. The Muslim history is likewise unclear about the name of the group. They are referred to as Jabariya (they believed in the absolute authority and control of God) as well as Qadariya (they denied Man’s power to decide). I shall discuss this in detail later in the book.

The question of the originator (Ma’abad or Jahm) and the source (Zoarastrianism, Judaism or Christianity) aside, there is no doubting the fact that this anti-Quranic concept came into Islam from non-Islamic sources. It occurred in the early days of the (Abbasid)  period.

The intriguing question is how such an anti-Quranic concept was accepted by Muslims? Despite the philosophical arguments presented in its support, the Muslims could not, in all probability, have accepted it without an Islamic evidence. Lo and behold! They were presented with such an evidence!  How  did  it  all  happen?   It  is  another  sorry   tale.   The   evidence presented

The ‘Din’ Evidence for an Anti-Quranic Idea

formed the basis not only of

the question of taqdeer but also of all the anti-Quranic concepts injected into Islam.

Allah had declared the Quran as the  original  source of  the ‘Din’.  The

The Tradition

Messenger  taught  and  followed  the  Quran.  As long as it

remained so, no anti-Islamic concept could be introduced. The Conspirators attacked this foundation and propagated the notion that the ultimate authority in ‘Din’ is not the Quran alone. It is accompanied by a likeness of it – the tradition (Hadith) of the Messenger. Initially the tradition was presented as an instrument to interpret and explain the Quran. Later, it was elevated to the position of the hidden (unwritten) revelation. This notion was almost identical to the Jewish concept of two kinds of divine revelation. One is Tora shabktals (the visible, written revelation) of the Book of Moses, the other Tora Shabalfa (the hidden, unwritten revelation), consisting of the tradition of Moses, given through Aaron. The whole system of Jewish jurisprudence is based upon Mosaic Tradition. The Quran mentions only one kind of revelation – the one preserved in its entirety in the Quran. But now, the same notion of two kinds of revelation (the Quran and Mohammed’s tradition) was floated and propagated among Muslims. The Quran is called ‘the recited revelation’ while the Tradition is termed as ‘the un-recited revelation’.

Subsequently, the idea was propagated that if two pieces of revelation are found to be contradictory to each other, one of them must cancel the other. It followed logically that in case of a clash in the above mentioned two kinds of revelation, the tradition shall supersede the Quran. This notion established the tradition as the ultimate source of authority in religious matters reducing the Quran to a book to be recited as a virtue!

The Messenger did not give the Muslims any collection of his tradition. He only gave the Quran (complete and duly arranged) which we have today exactly as he did. Neither his righteous successors (the first four caliphs) nor any of the other companions compiled his tradition. Abu-Bakr & Omar (the first and the second caliph, respectively) even forbade the writing or citing of the tradition for fear of polluting the ‘Din’ (as presented by the Quran)! But, once the above mentioned concept of Hadith had been introduced, a need arose for compiling the tradition. The compilation accepted as the most authentic (that of Imam Bokhari), appeared in the third century (Hijra). Imam Bokhari died in 256 H. All the other collections (with the exception of Imam Malik’s Muatta’ which contained very few traditions) were complied after that. All these books were compiled not from any documented record but from oral tradition of the people. It is not difficult to make an academic & historical – let alone religious – assessment of tradition compiled on oral evidence about 250 year after the death of Mohammed. Nonetheless, these traditions, since most of them were attributed to Mohammed, were accepted as authentic. Rejection of any one of them meant denouncing one’s (Muslim) faith. Apart from the possibility of human error, on the part of the tradition tellers, the opportunity it gave to fabricators of Hadith is staggering. For example, Imam Bokhari (according to his own statement) collected 600,000 pieces of tradition. Sifting through this mass – on the basis of his own judgment (he had no authority or approval from Mohammed) – he selected only about 7000, rejecting about 593,000!

You may wonder why the Muslims accepted something with such a shaky base. The reasons are sentimental. Muslims have tremendous love, affection and respect for Mohammed. Every thing and anything connected to him is highly revered. The tradition (which are his actions and pronouncements) apart, people are known to kiss & prostate in front of certain impressions in stone said to be Mohammed’s footprints! Such sentiments were exploited by the fabricators of Hadith, and were they successful!

This  is  how  anti-Islamic  concepts  became part of the Muslim ideology.

Tradition to support Compulsion

Here   are  a  few  examples  of  the

tradition about the question of taqdeer (from a very authentic collection Mishkat – chapter on taqdeer):

i)          Report from Abdullah bin Omar: ‘Said the Messenger that God Almighty, 50,000 years before creating the Universe, while His throne was on water, wrote the destinies of all creatures.                                                                                                (from ‘Muslim’)

ii)         The son of Omar reports:

‘The Messenger said that all things are subject to Destiny, even wisdom and stupidity.’

(from ‘Muslim’)

iii)        Reported from Ali:

‘The Messenger said, ‘Each one of you has his fate pre-decided, i. e., paradise or hell.’

(from ‘Muslim & Bukhari’)

This is elaborated upon thus:

Abdu Hraira reports: ‘The Messenger said, “One will certainly fornicate as much as has been written by Allah. (‘Bokhari’ & ‘Muslim’)

Further: ‘The Messenger said, “Allah created Adam, caressed his back with His right hand and created his progeny from his back, and said, ‘I have created them for Paradise, so they will behave accordingly.’ Once again He caressed Adam’s back and created his progeny and said, ‘I have created them for Hell, so they will act accordingly.’

Hearing this, a man queried, “O Messenger of Allah! What is the use of doing deeds then? The Messenger replied, ‘When God creates someone for Paradise, he is made to behave accordingly. Similarly, when He creates someone for Hell, he is made to act accordingly. Then He sends them to Paradise or Hell accordingly.

(Maalik, Tirmizi, Abu Dawood)

iv)        Abdullah bin Omer reports:

‘Once the Messenger emerged (from his house, probably) carrying two books. He addressed us, ‘Do you know about these books?’ We said, ‘We know not, O Messenger of Allah!’ He pointed to the book in his right hand and said, ‘This book is from Allah. It contains the names of those destined for Paradise. Nothing can be added to, or deleted from, it.’ Then he pointed to the book in his left hand and said, ‘This book is also from Allah, It contains the names of those destined for Hell. Nothing can be added to, or deleted from, it.’

v)         Abu Darda reports:

‘The Messenger of Allah said, ‘Allah has done and already finished His work about each single one of His subjects in FIVE areas, i.e., they have been written as his destiny: his time (age), his good or bad deeds, his place of abode, his return and his sustenance. ‘      (Ahmed)

The collections of Hadith are full of reports such as these. Any one looking at them in the light of the Quran, and of knowledge and wisdom, is bound to have a variety of objections and questions. The fabricators of such reports had foreseen this situation and fabricated suitable reports accordingly. For example, Abu Huraira reports: ‘We were discussing the question of taqdeer when the Messenger came by. Hearing our discussion, he became red in the face – as if it was full of pomegranate juice – and said, “it this what you have been instructed to do? Is this my mission? Peoples in the past were destroyed when they discussed this problem. I put you under oath, and I do it again, never to discuss, argue or talk about the question.”    (from ‘Tirmizi’)

Thus the anti-Quranic tradition about taqdeer was assured immunity from criticism. Next was another very significant step regarding the figurative language  (similes, etc.)  of  the Quran –  a  well-know  style.  For  instance,  the

The Figurative and the Literal

word (عرش)  in  (ثم استوى على العرش ) –  and

then He settled on the throne – has been taken to mean a real seat in the literal sense as well as, figuratively, the center of power and control over the universe. One can take either of the positions   without jeopardizing one’s Conviction (ايمان). Other instances, however, have to be taken literally and only in one way. For example, the verse (قل هو الله احد ) – Say that Allah is One – does not allow one to accept any other position than to accept and declare that there is only one God. The Quran  has laid  down,  categorically,   the   things   essential  for

Constituents of Conviction

one’s Conviction (popularly know as Articles of

Faith). The FIVE constituents of Conviction are Allah, Angels, Messenger, (Divine) Books, and the Judgment Day (2/177). Denying or rejecting any of these makes one a Dissenter (Kaafir) -(4/136). The Quran mentions the FIVE constituents only. But then a SIXTH article was introduced – and it has stayed – i. e., taqdeer (pre-destiny). Once again, this addition was made through tradition.

The SIXTH Constituent

For example: i)  Ali reports: ‘Said’  the  Messenger

that no one can be a momin (convinced Muslim) until one accepts the following: 1. Testify that God alone is worthy of worship and I (Mohammed) am His Messenger sent with the Truth; 2. Accept death as fact; 3. Accept resurrection; 4. Accept taqdeer.’       (Tirmizi; Ibn Maja)

ii) Ibn Wailmy reports: ‘Ibn Abi Kaab visited me and I told him of some misgivings I had had about taqdeer, and asked him to narrate tradition in the hope of alleviating my doubt. He said, ‘If Allah were to send calamities to people, He wouldn’t be an oppressor. If He were merciful, His benevolence would doubtlessly exceed peoples’ deeds. If you were to spend in charity gold equivalent of the Uhad (mountain), your deed will not be acceptable until you wholly accept taqdeer. You must understand that whatever reached you, had to be so; and whatever you did not get, had to be so. If you believe anything contravening this concept of taqdeer, you will burn in hellfire! Ibn Wailym further reports: ‘After hearing out Ibn Abi Ka’ab, I went to Abdullah Ibn Masud who said the same. Then I went to Huzaifa bin AlYaman who said the same. Then I went to Zaid Ibn Thaabit and he quoted the Messenger’s tradition to the same effect.  (Ahmed, Abu Dawood, Ibn Maaja). That is how this concept of taqdeer, taken from Zoarastians, Christians and Jews became a part of Muslim philosophy. How  important it  has  become  to  the  religious minded among the

Elaboration by the late Syed Sulaiman Nadwi

Muslims  can  been  from

Syed Sulaiman Nadwi’s serial work on the life of Mohammed. In the fourth volume, treating concepts, he talks about Allah, Angels, Books, Messengers and Dooms Day. Then he denotes an entire chapter to taqdeer with the title ‘Qaza-o-Qadr’. It opens thus:

‘Though the Quran has not listed it (taqdeer) in reference to Imaan (Articles of Faith), its frequent repetition in the Quran makes it important enough to be made another article of Faith. Therefore, some traditions have shown it to be the last constituent of Imaan’.       (Seeratun Nabi, P860)

The practical implications of a particular concept becoming an ‘article of faith’ can be assessed only when the clergy wields political power. It has been decreed (by the clergy) that a Muslim rejecting any of these articles of faith becomes a ‘Murtad’ (denouncer of religion) and a murtad is punishable by death. The Muslim historical accounts testify to the bloodshed of Muslims committed by the clergy in the name of safeguarding the sixth article of faith.

— x – x – x – x – x – x – x —

The  question must  arise  here  that when this anti-Quranic concept was

Protest against all this

being propagated was there no protesting voice

against it at all? Had the Islamic nation run out of members who would negate this alien idea by presenting the Quranic view? The fact is that such people did  exist and strong protest were made. Their arguments were:

i)          The ultimate authority of ‘Din’ is Allah’s Book (the Quran) which can be understood if knowledge and reason are employed.

ii)         The Law of Returns is a fundamental principle of the Quranic philosophy according to which Man is responsible for his actions. The institution of divine guidance through Allah’s book and messengers and the principle of reward and punishment (both here and in the hereafter), all support the view of Man’s free will.

Rejection of this view (by the idea of Compulsion) reduces Man to the level of the inanimate (elements, minerals, etc.) and the animate (plants, animals) who have no will, and therefore, no responsibility. That is why no messenger has ever been sent to them!

These  weighty  arguments  were  rebutted  by the compulsionists in a uniquely

Countering by calling names

effective   way.   Apart   from   the   Hadith

(mentioned earlier), they developed a technique of labeling their opponents with derogatory names. This continues to this day. For example, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan proposed certain ideas which were strongly opposed by the conservatively religious. He had said that the secret of West’s progress lies in studying and harnessing nature, so we (the Muslims of British India) must study natural sciences. The clergy picked on the word ‘nature’ and began referring to Sir Syed as ‘Natury’  (a naturalist). Their propaganda made the word synonymous with atheism, paganism, anti-religion, etc. They advised people not to pay any attention to ‘this naturalist’. Sadly, no one ever bothered to stop and ask what the term really meant. This technique of labeling an opponent out is justly illustrated by a (perhaps fictional) story in which a Hindu trader in a village was labeled as a Wahabi (a Muslim sect detested by the majority sect of Sunnis) by the village moulvi (Muslim priest)!

The compulsionists had invented names like Mutazila and Qadariya for their opposers. Fabricated tradition also appeared claiming that the Messenger had said, : ‘The Qadariya are the Magus of this (Islamic) nation’. This made them rejecters of faith (murtad), and therefore, punishable by death! Their writings were burned, losing valuable intellectual work for ever! That was the end of Mutazila (Qadariya). Since then, the clergy has routinely used the label of Mutazila to quieten voices of reason. Consequently, the Muslim world has long forgotten the use of reason and intellect. Sir Syed was labeled as Mutazila as well as I (the author of this book)! I have been declared a kaafir by a collective decree of 1000 religious leaders!

The  Compulsionists  also  present  certain  Quranic verses in support of

The Quranic Support for Compulsion

Their   view.  For  instance

“يضل من يشاء ويهدي من يشاء “ (He misleads whom He wished and guides whom He wishes) and “يغفر لمن يشاء ويعذب من يشاء “ (He spares whom He wishes and punishes whom He wishes) etc. Let me examine in detail some of such verses which are essential to a correct understanding of the question of taqdeer.


Before I embark upon the task of explaining such Quranic verses as mentioned  above,  it   is   essential   to   deliberate   on   the   fundamentals  of

Fundamentals of Comprehension of the Quran

comprehension of the

Quran. First of all, please note that one of the evidences presented by the Quran in support of its claim of being divine is its consistency and absolute lack of internal contradiction (4/82). Therefore, it is not possible for the Quran to support as well as reject free will of Man.

Secondly, if one comes across apparent contradiction in the Quran, it must neither be considered superficially nor ignored. In such situations, the Quran has suggested deliberation with reason.

As far as deliberation in the Quran is concerned, there are two points of absolute importance. One is to consider all the Quranic verses about a particular topic to get the true picture. This is called “تصريف الآيات “ – repetition of verses – by the Quran. Secondly, no verse can be interpreted in a way contrary to the central themes of the Quran. For instance, one of the central themes of the book is that Allah is unique. Now, Allah has been called al-Khaaliq (the creator). Elsewhere, He is referred to as  “احسن الخالقين” (the best of creators). Apparently, there is a contradiction here – if the Quran recognizes creators other than Allah, He cannot be unique. This confusion is cleared when one deliberates in the manner suggested in earlier. The Quran calls Allah “فاطر السموات والأرض “ or “بديع السموات والأرض“ (the One who has brought the Universe into existence from nothing). Only He can do it. Therefore, Allah and Man differ in their creative powers as Man can create only from matter already existing.

I propose to employ this approach later in this book to interpret ‘ verses of intention’ – “ما يشاء “, “من يشاء “, “لو شاء “, etc.

I must ask the reader to bear in mind one very important  point in this regard. In the following chapters, when I use the expressions like ‘the commonly accepted translation’ or ‘the current interpretation’ etc., I don’t mean what the masses believe in. Those translations and interpretations of the Quran have been authored by learned scholars. My reader may ask here, once again bewilderingly: ‘How did learned scholars wrote what they did?

Let us ponder for a while on this.

We  have  seen that the very first Muslim history was complied by Imam Tabri in

Interpretations of the Quran

the fourth century (hijra). The very same Tabri

is also the first ever interpreter of the Quran. He quotes traditions of the Messenger in support of his interpretation. This made it appear to be an interpretation by Mohammed himself. Under the circumstances, no Muslim dares differ with it! Therefore, the subsequent interpretations were based upon Tabri’s book The differences, if any, were minor and even then on the basis of tradition. The translations of the Quran were bound to be influenced by these preceding interpretations.

Another Muslim attitude, handed down since generations, regarding their ancestors is that even a little bit of dissent is sinful. If the attitude towards tradition was that it has been simply attributed (subject to confirmation) to Mohammed, an interpretation other than the tradition would have been possible. This was not to be. Consequently, deliberation in the Quran has been static for centuries. The Quran should be interpreted in its own light. That is precisely what I have tried to do. As to translation, as I have said in the foreword of this book, the Quran just cannot be translated into another language. Words exactly synonymous with the Quranic lexicon simply do not exist elsewhere.  Therefore, I maintain that the Quran can be interpreted but NOT translated. A verbatim translation just does not explain the meanings of the Quran. In the chapters to follow, I have interpreted the Quran in the same way – an interpretation of the Quran supported by the Quran.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed

The Arabic root ‘ش – ي – ا ‘  is the source of words like ‘مشيئة – شيئاً – يشاء – شاء ‘ etc. Traditionally, it is translated into Urdu as ‘to wish’. This inaccurate translation (and its interpretation) is the cause of so much confusion regarding the question of destiny. Let us first look carefully at it.

The Arabic work ‘مشيئة ‘ means to have an intention (to do something).              Though some linguists take‘ارادة ‘  and  ‘مشيئة ‘  to be synonymous in meaning,

Intention & Will

there is a semantic difference. ‘ارادة ‘ is to intend to do and

‘مشيئة’ is the realization of intention. Hence, ‘شيء’ (thing) is the resulting product of intention. Therefore, the two terms (ارادة  & مشيئة ) must be viewed with that difference regarding Allah, even though they are commonly taken to mean to want / to wish / to intend. For example, “(Allah’s) His amr is that when He intends to do something He says to it, ‘Be’, and it is.” (36/82).

Chapter (2) of this book dealt in detail with the creation plan of Allah. It consists of two stages – ‘amr’ and ‘khalq’. About ‘amr’, I quote from my work Lughaat-al-Quran:

‘The process of CAUSE & EFFECT is a matter of common observation. But, the chain of events, if rolled back, has to stop somewhere (the initial starting point). There, the EFFECT had to be without a CAUSE. That is the moment of  creation of the Universe by Allah – by His will and intention. Why did He do what He did? The question is unanswerable as it refers to a period not falling within our concepts of rules and laws.

(Root “ش ي ا” , p. 789)

So, that is Allah’s amr, where creation is done according to His own scheme and universal laws are established. Why does water have the characteristic of keeping its level? Why is fire hot? Why does poison kill? Simply because Allah wanted it so. We observe Allah’s will (مشيئة) in the physical universe around us. Similarly, He has established laws (His مشيئة ) for the social universe. These laws were given to Man through His messengers. Therefore, the Quranic use of “شاء – يشاء etc.” should be translated as: ‘whatever is His law or Will’ (مشيئة) and not as : ‘whatever He wants’. It should be: ‘Whatever He has already wanted’. This slight change in translation alleviates so much confusion and apparent contradiction. The preset chapter is an attempt to do just that.


I –  لو شاء الله   – If Allah Willed

This expression often appears in the Quran and is usually translated as: ‘If Allah wanted……’ It should be translated as: ‘If Allah had formulated the Law like……’. For instance, salt has a salty taste because Allah wanted it so and made it so. If He had formulated salt to be with a sweet taste, it would have been sweet. Can Allah change the taste of salt from salty to sweet? The answer to that is: Yes, He can but He won’t, because He has pledged NOT to make changes in laws He has established according to His will (مشيئة). Thus, in the expression concerned, the word  “لو”  (if) means: ‘That will never happen’. Sayyuty writes in his ‘Itteqan’:

‘Ibn Abi Hatim, in the way of Dhahaak, reports from Ibn Abbas, who said: ‘wherever لو appears in the Quran, it means that it will never occur’.

(Itteqan, Part I, 40th kind)

In al-Melal wan-Nahal,  Imam Ibn Hazan  supports  this  meaning,  explaining  it

Examples from the Quran

elaborately. Here are some examples from the


i)   Allah’s will (مشيئة ) about the entire universe – inanimate matter, plants, animals etc. — , with the exception of Man, is that it functions slavishly according to the laws inherent in its makeup. This is known as ‘instinct’, referred to as ‘revelation’ (وحي ) by the Quran. It is also referred to as ‘nature of things’ e.g., liquids keep their level, certain animals are herbivores while others are carnivores, and so on. All similar things behave in a similar fashion, everywhere and at all times.

Man, on the other hand, is different. There is no ‘human nature’ nor is he gifted with……….. guidance for behavior. Social laws are given to Man externally through revelation with complete freedom of choice. That is why mankind is not naturally welded into ‘one nation’. People behave differently under the same circumstances.

A superficial  look at  the  disharmony  of  the  human  race may give rise

Why were all people not created good?

to the question: ‘Why did

Allah not create all men good and peace-loving?

The Quran’s response to that query is the following. Of course, it was perfectly within His powers to create Man compelled like the rest of the creation. But, He did not will it so. He gave Man a free will. Therefore, any social system which denies men the right to exercise their free will – is anti-Quranic. The Messenger, much in the manner of a loving physician, desired people to accept Islam. But, Allah said, “Are you going to torture yourself over people not accepting the message? “ (26/3).

Sura Younis says: “ If Allah had willed so, all men on Earth would have become convinced (of the message but He did not will it so and gave Man the freedom of choice). Then, are you (the Messenger) going to push people to conviction (against their will)?” (10/99). “If We had wanted (all men to forcibly follow Our way), We would have provided guidance to each single person….. “ (33/13). People have complete freedom of choice to accept or reject the guidance to the right path (18/29). The aim is to develop human qualities and test the use of free will (5/48-49). Men can resolve their differences by willfully and freely choosing the right path. It will NOT be forced upon them (11/118-119). If compulsion was there, there would have been no dissenters or atheists (6/108, 6/138). In that case men would have been like stones or animals, NOT human!

Man has been created with free will. He can be made to go against his will by two methods. One is to threaten him physically. The other is to influence his psychology. Mysticism achieves this through ‘ supernatural’ events (minor miracles). It was quite widespread at the advent of Islam. Therefore, the dissenters of Arabia  used  to  press  the  Messenger  to  produce miracles in

Demand for Miracles

in support of his message. Allah would reply

through the Messenger, that He expects them to arrive at the truth by using their reasoning intellect, exercising their free will. It is not befitting Allah to grant the faculty of free will and then suspend it.

Sura Anaam  refers  to  this  thus:  “They  say  why  Allah  does  not give  His

Allah’s Reply

Messenger  a miracle?  Say  (to them)  Allah is perfectly

capable to doing it but most of them don’t know (why He doesn’t)” (6/37). Mohammed was told that if he were to reach the inner-most depths of the earth or the loftiest heights of the sky and bring them a miracle, they will still not be (worthy of being termed) as ‘convinced’. That is, they may psychologically be forced into submission, but it will not be conviction (which comes through independent reasoning and free choice). So, don’t be like the ones who, out of ignorance, ask why Allah did not make all men good (6/35). Conviction springs from the bottom of one’s heart (6/36).

Elsewhere, the Quran, referring to this demand of miracles (13/27), talks about the Muslims who begin to think favorably of such use of miracles and says: “Tell them that if the Quran was to move mountains and shrink distances, or make the dead speak, even then they would not become ‘convinced’. Allah has set laws for everything (13/31). The law in this regard is that people who don’t use reasoning remain confused (10/150). Then said, (Do you now understand that) “If Allah wanted it so, He would have put the entire mankind on the right path (13/31).

ii)    All the killings  and  violence  in the world make many of us wonder why Allah

Why all this violence and killing

Does  not  do  something  to stop  the

bloodshed. Incidentally, in the allegorical story of the creation of Man this was the eventuality feared by angels. In reply to this, Sura Baqara says that Allah, through His Messengers, sent guidance to mankind advising them against bloodshed. People would resume mutual killings and the Messengers were dead. “If Allah had willed it so, they would not have killed…….. (2/253). Allah does not exercise compulsion on men. They are free to choose. That is why “some of them are convinced, some are not (2/53)”.


لو شاء الله(If Allah wanted) is widely taken to mean that Allah purposefully allows all the wrong-doing going on in the world. So, in a way, He wants the situation to be as it is. Granted that, with the advent of knowledge, not many believe in it any more, the ancient Muslim literature, that of mysticism in particular, supports this view. This view was the one presented by the atheists and dissenters at the time of the Messenger. They have been reported to say in Sura An’aam: “If God wanted it so, we or our ancestors would never have committed atheism …“  (6/149) – also: (16/35 and 43/20). Sura Yasim reports their response, when asked to help the poor, as: “Should we feed those (people) who would have been fed if Allah wanted it so?” (36/47).

Therefore, the Quran takes this view as that of the dissenters and polytheists  – way of the ignorant.


II –  ما شاء الله    – What Allah Wills

This expression is widely taken to mean that events occur according to Allah’s will, no matter how hard we try to make things happen any other way. This view obviously is a result of the concept of compulsion. Let us now try to look at the Quranic view of this oft-used expression.

Examples from the Quran

(i)   “Sura  Baqara  says:  ‘Man  can have no

knowledge of things except for whatever (Allah) wills” (2/255). It should be taken as to mean that Man can obtain knowledge through laws already established by Allah (His will – مشيئة); even then his knowledge will be limited as compared to Allah’s.

(ii)  Sura Kahaf reports the allegory of two orchard owners. One of them had the right view of life while the other: “.. was unfair on himself” (18/35). He was a dissenter of Allah and His Law of Returns. The natural result was that his crops were all destroyed. The other man (convinced) said to him: You should have said, “All this occurs according to Allah’s (natural) laws. Nobody, other than Him, has the power to do it” (18/39).

(iii) Please recall the following discussion from the chapter which dealt with Good and Evil.

Sura Younis reports: “O Messenger! The  dissenters pester you tauntingly

Loss and Gain

to bring upon them the dreaded destruction. Tell them that it

not upto you (the messenger). Say: ‘I am not empowered (even) to hurt or benefit myself outside the bounds of laws established by Allah” (10/49)., Also: “there is a law for everything. When the period of respite is over, the (destruction) comes right on time” (10/49).

Referring to the laws of ‘life and death’ for nations, Sura Ar-Raad says: Law of Respite  “Every period of respite is under a law. People (s) are destroyed and survive according to Allah’s laws (مشيئة). These laws were established according to the ‘Mother of Books’ He has, (He did it according to His own will (مشيئة)” (13/39).

(vi)  Occasionally,  there  appears  in  the  Quran,  the  phrase  (الا ما شاء الله). For

الا ما شاء الله  – But whatever Allah wills

Instance, in Sura al-Aala: ‘We have

given this Quran to you (O Messenger) in a way that you will not forget (any of) it – it well never happen! (87/6-7). The phrase الا ما شاء الله  (except what Allah wills) should not be taken to mean: “you may forget of it only as much as Allah allows”. The Messenger was not to forget any of the revelation at all! (17/86). Mufti Mohammed Abdu writes in his al-Manar: “In the Quran, ‘exception to Allah’s will مشيئة always means consistency and occurrence of event – i. e., the opposite of what has been said will never happen. الا  (except or but) in this phrase means that Allah will (مشيئة) won’t  be contrary to what has been said – He would have had it otherwise if He wanted it so. Therefore, the verses above (87/6-7) mean: “You will never be able to forget it”.

Supportive of this interpretation of the phrase in question are the verses from sura Hood, which talk about permanent occupancy of Paradise and Hell, saying: “They shall be in it till the universe is – except (this) what you Preserver wants …” (11/109, 11/108),  also: (6/120). It means that they will stay there according to the Law of Allah’s will (for ever).

Summarizing then, we can see that – ما شاء الله  – doesn’t mean Allah’s will will be carried out no matter what Man does – the Quran has given free choice to men by saying اعملوا ما شئتم  (do whatever you wish). Allah  exercised His will to formulate and establish laws. After that, Man is to exercise his own will to go against those laws if he so desires. However, Man should bear in mind the Law of Returns which oversees his actions (انه بما تعملون بصير  – 41/40). Man is free to choose his action but is not free to change the natural consequences of that action.

III –  إن شاء الله    –  If Allah Wills

The phrase – traditionally translated as: If Allah so desires – is an everyday expression of our language (Urdu as well as Arabic speakers use it very frequently). Its significance may be seen in an imaginary conversation which follows:

A:        You’ll go there at 4 o’clock, won’t you?

B:        Insha Allah (If Allah wills) it.

A:        It is quite an important matter. Please don’t give me Insha Allah.

Make me a firm promise that you will be there at 4 o’clock!

That shows that ‘Insha Allah’ is used in uncertain situations. Apparently, this usage of the term is ordinary, but, in reality, is not so. One can never be certain of one’s actions when one holds the view of Man’s inability to take action against Allah’s supposedly pre-decided chain of events in the human world. The resulting inconfidence has bred the habit of uttering the phrase Insha Allah with almost every action. So much so that the majority of Muslims, especially  in   the  sub-continent,  consider  it a  minor  sin to omit it from one’s

The Airplane Disasters

conversation. Pakistan International Airline used to

be considered quite a dependable service. By chance (really because of lack of technical application, mismanagement, etc.), it met with a few airplane accidents. During the course of investigation, the religious lobby of the country blamed the pilot’s omission of the phrase ‘Insha Allah’ when announcing the craft’s departure. The situation was addressed by inserting the phrase in the captain’s announcement. Still, accidents continued to happen!

The pre-fix – إن – is widely taken to mean ‘if’.  But it has other uses which

Meanings of ‘In’ (إن)

are,  unfortunately,  ignored in translating the Quran.

Grammatically, it is also used to mean ‘because’. Sayyuti, in his Itteqan, has presented several examples of it. Let me illustrate this with another imaginary conversation:

A:        Don’t bother with making tea. It will take quite sometime whereas

I am rather in a hurry.

B:        It won’t take much time. I have put the kettle on. We’ll have tea in

ten minutes.

A:        In ten minutes?

B:        Insha Allah! (Of course. I have taken all steps needed to make

tea. Nature will certainly work its laws (Allah’ will – مشيئة ) and we

will definitely have tea in ten minutes. It just can’t be otherwise!).

The change in meaning of إن , is so obvious! Now, it breeds confidence instead of uncertainty. According to Arabic lexicon, إن is also used to mean إذ  (when). Sayyuti gives some very illustrative examples:

i)     Sura Aal-e-Imran: “Because you are convinced, you will (definitely) triumph (and be on top)” (3/138).

ii)  Sura Fath: “You will certainly enter the sacred mosque (Kaaba in Makkah) because you are convinced (and working according to Allah’s laws)” (48/27).

iii)     Sura Yousef, referring to Messenger Yousef’s (Joseph) parents and others arriving in Egypt, says: “(Yousef) said (to them) ‘Enter Egypt. You will be in peace because it is all happening according to Allah’s will – مشيئة – “ (12/99).

iv)      When the father-in-law of Moosa (Moses), believed to be Messenger Shoaib, agreed with him a working contract, he said to Moosa: “ Because I follow Allah’s way, you will find me one of the righteous” (28/27); also: (18/69 and 37/102).

v)       In the battle of Ahzaab, the hypocrites had committed grave acts of betrayal against the Muslims. Allah’s law regarding criminals is to forgive if the convicted show remorse and promise of improved behavior. Otherwise, they must be punished. In view of this, regarding the hypocrites, it was said: “The hypocrites are to be punished, according to Allah’s will, or forgiven” (33/24).


Sura Luqman says: “And no one knows what one will do tomorrow” (31/34). This  is because  one  can never be sure of  EVERY THING –   that is the

Don’t say ‘I’ll definitely do (this  or  that)   tomorrow’

unknown (غيب ). We can predict (forecast) the exact  moment  of  solar  eclipse   100  years  from

now, but cannot tell the next landing spot of a common fly. That is why the Quran says: ‘and don’t say what you will definitely do tomorrow, except do whatever is required in that regard according to Allah’s will (مشيئة)’. If you come across factors hitherto unknown to you, you won’t succeed. So just do what you know is required. “Don’t be frustrated if you fail. Retrace you steps and try to remember and see what you missed. You will be more sure of, and closer to, success” (18/23-24).


Let us  now  examine verses using ‘In’ إن , in the meaning of IF. It will be

‘in’  إن meaning IF

good  to have  a brief  version  of  ‘If Allah  wanted so’

(لو شاء الله ) – i. e., If Allah so desired, He would have created poison without its lethal aspect (He did not want it so. Therefore he made poison with its characteristics it has). This is exactly what is meant in verses using ‘In’ in the meaning of IF:

i)  Sura Yaseen refers to the fact of such heavily-laden boats floating as easily as ducks. This is because He wanted it so. “If He didn’t, they would sink ….. “ (36/43) similar is the case of winds helping sails (42/33).

ii)    Messenger Nooh (Noah) used to warn his people of the destructive consequences of their wrong ways. They would challenge him to bring upon them the dreaded calamity. He would reply: “That (calamity) will befall you according to Allah’s will (His program – مشيئة )” (11/33).

iii)   Allah revealed the Quran in its entirety and has taken it upon Himself to safeguard it. Therefore, it is just un-thinkable that any part of the Quran may be lost. In this regard He says: “If we had so desired (according to Our program – مشيئة ), We would have taken some it away ….” (17/86).

Also, He says to the Messenger: “If Allah had wanted so, He would have sealed your hear (so that the message would not enter it) …. “ (42/24).

iv)   Allah created Man with the instruction: “For you there is temporary (upto a time) stay on Earth” (2/36). Man’s stay on Earth, in his present form of life, the life of the Universe itself etc., are matter concerning Allah’s program (مشيئة ) Therefore, “If He so desires, O Man! He will remove you all and bring others (to replace you). And Allah has set laws to that effect: (4/133). See also: 14/19; 35/16).

v)    The same phrase ‘If He so desired’ (إن شاء الله ) has been used in regards to rise and fall of nations – (6/139).


We have seen that the Quran says to men,  ‘Do whatever you like’.  The

Don’t desire but what Allah desires

Quran  says about itself: ‘Be informed

that it (the Quran) is reminder (of truths forgotten). So, whoever so wishes may revive (them) – (80/11-12). But the Quran also contains verses like the following with traditionally current sense of translation):

i)       ‘This is an advice. So, whoever wishes to have the path to his Allah. But you won’t wish except what Allah wishes’.  (76/29-30)

ii)      ‘This is nothing but advice for (all) the worlds; for one among you who wishes to follow a straight path. And you don’t want but what want Allah, the Sustainer of the worlds’.  (81/27-29); also: (74/56)

Urdu Translation by: Shah Rafiuddin

Obviously, this mode of translation presents ridiculous interpretation because what it effectively means is: Allah gave Man a code of behavior (the Quran) giving him free choice to either adopt or reject it. Nevertheless, the situation is that Man does not really have a choice of his own since he is bound to make a decision which Allah wants him to.

This gives rise to the concept of a contradictory God. All the confusion results from the idea of Compulsion. Let us look closely at the phrase (ما تشاؤن ). The Arabic ‘ ما  ‘, although used for WHAT, is also used for NOT, which is precisely the case in these verses. (I have dealt with this grammatical point in my work on the Quranic lexicon, the Lughaat-al-Quran). Therefore, (وما تشاؤن الا أن يشاء الله ) comes to mean: ‘and you (should) not wish but only what Allah’s (program – مشيئة ) wishes’. In other words, it is better for Man to synchronize his desires with the cosmic and social design formulated and established by Allah, which,  in a nutshell is this: ‘Allah doesn’t want his created people to deny the Truth. It will be in line with His wishes if you choose the right path. If you reject (the message) Allah is not affected by it (only you will be!) as each single one of you has to bear the consequences of your own individual actions. These consequences shall be manifested (in due time, according to, Allah’s laws – مشيئة) as His system keeps track of whatever you do. (39/7).

I am confident that very clear to the reader are  the very different (almost opposite) meanings rendered to the verses in question. They transform a helplessly bonded creature into an intelligent, free-choosing creation!

—–* – * – * – * – * – * ——

IV –  من يشـاء  –  (Whoever wishes)

The verses presented in support of their view by the Compulsionists are the ones with the phrase ‘ من يشاء ‘ – translated as ‘whom (He) wishes. For instance: ‘He (Allah) misguides whom He wishes and guides whomever He wishes’ – (16/93); ‘He (Allah) forgives whomever He wishes and punishes whomever He wishes – ‘ (2/284); ‘He (Allah) gives means of living in plenty to whoever He wishes and measures it (in small measures) for whoever He wishes – ‘ (17/30).

Taken as that, these verses clash with the general and basic Quranic philosophy of (mis)guidance — ‘Say (to them) the Truth is (here) from your Preserver, so accept whoever (among you) wants it or reject (if you so wish) –‘ (18/29). About punishment and forgiveness, a very frequent verse of the Quran is: ‘It is the result of their deeds’. The principle regarding means of living is: ‘There is nothing for Man except what he strives for – (53/39).

The contradiction renders meaningless the Quran’s claim of being a divine revelation because it has cited its consistency as evidence of its divine origin.

According   to  Arabic  grammar,  من يشاء  can  have  two  uses – ‘whoever

Two meanings

wishes’ or ‘whomever He wishes’. For instance, 16/93

may be interpreted as either ‘Allah guides or misguides whomever He wishes’ or ‘whoever so wishes is guided or misguided’. Similarly, the other two examples cited above may be taken to have either Allah or Man as the subject of the sentence.

My stand is to take the interpretation which is consistent with other verses on the same topic as well as the overall philosophy of the Quran. The Law of Returns (every action of Man has a reaction, and therefore, a consequence) is the pivot of the Quranic ideology. Therefore, it is logical and sensible to take Man as the subject of the sentences in the verses in question.

An important verse from Sura An-Nahal

Let me remind you of the previously quoted verse from Sura An-Nahal. The entire  verse  says  (as traditionally

translated): ‘If Allah had so wanted, He would have made you all one nation but He misguides whomever He wants and guides whomever He wishes so that He inquires from you about your deeds’ (16/93)

Obviously, this translation / interpretation has intrinsic contradiction. The correct interpretation should be: ‘If Allah has so wanted, He would have created Man as one group (like any animal species). But His plan (مشيئة ) is different. He has give Man the freedom of choice. Therefore, Man may choose the right path, or the wrong one – he is completely free to make a choice. That is why Allah will eventually hold Man responsible for his actions’.

Some verses use the expression من نشاء (whomever We want) or من يشاء Whomever Allah wants  (whomever I want). In such cases, the subject of the sentence has to be Allah. For instance, Sura Ana’am: “We raise status according to Our wish (Our Plan مشيئة ) (6/84). His program for raising status and position is: ‘To everyone the status according to their deeds –‘ (46/19). Similar is the situation of the physical universe around Man. Sura Rome, for instance, says: ‘Then He spreads them in the sky according to whatever is His wish (plan  مشيئة )….. ‘ (30/48). The system of progeny in men is subject to similar physical Laws (Allah’s plan  مشيئة ) (42/49-50).

—– x – x – x – x – x – x – x —-

V-  يفعل ما يشاء   (He (Allah) does what He wants

VI-  يحكم ما يريد (He (Allah) ordains what He intends)

Please have another brief look on Chapter – 2 where I talk (and later repeat) about the two aspects of Allah’s  Plan of Creation. First is amr when He creates out of nothingness and establishes laws for the existence, growth and development of things. At this stage He exercises His absolute, limitless discretion – ‘He creates whatever He wishes –‘ (42/49); ‘He does whatever He intends – (24/14); ‘No one can question Him over what He does –‘ (21/23), (5/1), 2/253). This aspect of creation (amr) has by no means come to an end Creation continues  (35/1). The universe known to Man is just one tiny drop in the ocean of Allah’s creation. Secondly, there is the creation (khalq – خلق) based  upon  matter already in existence.  At this stage, ‘He does  whatever He wants’

According to His Plan (مشيئة)

(يفعل ما يشاء)   means  that  He  does  things

according to laws and plans already set by Him. For instance: (i) Sura Ra’ad: “Every action has a result in due time (set by Allah’s law), so (things or nations) go out of existence when Allah (‘s law) wishes it – “ (13/38-39). (ii) Sura Ibrahim: “Allah has established (by His law) a firm system of life according to which the convinced survive here and in the hereafter; similarly, the transgressors go astray (and are destroyed); Allah does whatever He (by His law) wishes –“ (14/27). (iii) Sura Beni Israel says that the physical universe yields its bounties to anyone who strives for them in the right way – “The Dissenters as well as the Convinced can progress if they work according to their Preserver’s Law – His bounties are not denied to anyone. We want what We intend —“ (17/18-20). Allah’s plan (wish / intention / program مشيئة ) is to have the physical universe (here) open to everyone but restrict the hereafter to the righteous only (3/175). But it all happenes according to laws (3/107). It is Allah’s will that people bring hardship to themselves due to their own deeds (5/49). Allah’s laws in the physical universe are naturally there while He has sent His guidance through Revelation to Man for his social life (22/16). (iv) The story of Beni Israel spans a wide part of the Quran as it illustrates Allah’s laws regarding rise and fall of nations. Sura Qasas talks about the tyranny of the Pharaohs reaching its peak and the rising of Moses against it. He educated Israelites to that purpose and took them out of bondage into Sinai for renaissance The story of Israelites opens thus: “And We resolved to bestow Our favors on the people thus subjugated and wronged ….” (28/5). The resolve   by   Allah   was   realized  not  in  the  manner  used  in  amr . Here,  its  manifestation required  a  practical

Allah’s intention realized

program to be followed by the Israelites. But,

when Beni Israel, failed to act accordingly, the promised land (5.21) was declared out of bounds for forty years (5/26). The banishment to wilderness was the end of the old and the birth of a new (next) fresher generation who very speedily seized the ‘promised’ land! Therefore, Allah’s resolve regarding the human social world is realized by humans.

(v) Sura Haj: Verse 22/8 is traditionally translated as: ‘One who is degraded by Allah  cannot  have  respect.  Surely,  Allah  does  what  He likes’.  This  clearly

Laws for Respect & Degradation

means that  there are no laws for one’s

respectability (in society or even in Allah’s eyes). But this is not true. See, for instance, a verse from Sura Al-Fajr where it says that when a person (or a nation) is degraded, he says: ‘My Preserver has degraded me (without good reason)! Allah’s reply to that blame is that degradation is brought upon one by one’s own deeds, e. g., ‘but because you did not respect (and cared for) the lonely (people) … (89/16-17).

(vi) Sura Haj: “And  We  keep  it  (the fetus)  in  the wombs till a declared (fixed)

The Human Fetus’

period as We desire –“ (22/5). Obviously,  ‘as we

desire doesn’t mean that Allah decides the duration of each fetus individually. The entire process is subject to natural biological laws. Therefore ‘as We desire (ما نشاء ) means: according to (the law) which We have already willed (established).

Another  incidence  regarding  human  birth  mentioned  in  the  Quran  may  be

Zakariya’s Child

relevantly   interesting,  i. e.,   the   Messenger   Zakariya

begetting Yahya (John). Zakariya was quite old and his wife was infertile and, naturally, did not expect to have children. Therefore, he was doubtfully surprised when given the news of a forthcoming son. Allah’s reply in verse 3/39 which is traditionally translated thus: “Allah does whatever He wills”. This does not mean that Allah arbitrarily decided to give Zakariya a child. It all happened under natural medical laws – he was still fertile and his wife’s deficiency was removed (21/90), so they had a child, perfectly according to natural laws.

—– xxxxxxxxx —–

This brings us to a very interesting aspect of the topic under discussion.

Allah cannot be questioned over His decisions in the domain of amr (21/23). But, in the domain of khalq, the situation is different. Allah has promised Paradise  to  men  if  they  follow  the  Quranic  pattern  of  life —–  “This  is your Preserver’s

Allah can be questioned

Preserver’s promise which can be questioned”!


That, incidentally, is the Quran’s image of Allah — a creator who functions according to laws and is responsible for His actions. He is not a whimsical  dictator.  He  is a  law-abiding  ruler.  He  rules  by  set  laws  not  by

Concept of Allah in Imperial Islam

arbitrary decrees. Sadly, when Muslims

abandoned the Quran [at the end of the period of ‘the righteous caliphate’ (the first four successors of the Messenger) around year 40 Hijra], their concept of Allah changed to one of an emperor. Allah became an absolutely tyrannical dictator ruling the universe and humans according to His moods. This  concept of

Concept of Allah changed the        Social        System

Allah went very well with the idea of Compulsion.   So,  understandably,   the   Muslim kings  found it

to their advantage to support the idea of Compulsion, so much so that it came to be an article of faith. This illustrates how a human society is affected by its concept of God. It was very rightly said by Comte: ‘You Tell me about a group’s concept of God and I will tell you all about their civilization.

The Qran presents Allah in His true perspective. It also makes it clear that sovereignty is for Allah alone. This does away with imperialism, dictatorship, ecclesiastical leadership etc. This exclusion of all authority except Allah’s is the meaning of the well-known Quranic phrase “لا اله الا الله “ There is not god except Allah!


إن الله على كل شيء قدير  –  Allah Control All Things

This verse occurs frequently in the Quran. Traditionally, it is taken to mean that Allah does whatever He wants, whenever He wants. I have dealt, in Chapter 2,  with   the  Arabic  lexical  root  q – d- r-  (ق د ر  )  and  its derivatives.

Meaning of Qadeer

Qadeer means one who establishes measures and

standards. Therefore, the phrase at the head of this section will mean: “Allah has set measures and standards to all things (according to which they function)! Allah’s control (measures and standards) extends over every thing. By dint of being bound by laws, measures and standards, the universe is discoverable, and hence controllable by Man (45/13). This divine control extends also to the social world of humans — ‘(Mankind) benefits or suffers by its (own) deeds’ – (2/286). Just two verses before this, it says: ‘So one may get the protection of Allah, whoever so desires, or invites punishment, whoever so desires; and Allah is the Measurer of all things – (2/284).

Sure Aal-e-Imran: “Allah knows whatever is in your hearts and out. He knows everything in the expanses of the universe. He is the Measurer (standard-maker) of all things. Everyone shall face the results of their actions at the appointed time – (3/28-29); also : (5/40; 5/119-120).

Again, in Sura Aal-e-Imran, it says – ‘Those who take pride in being wrong, and expect undue praise, should know they cannot escape Allah’s law. The entire universe is His domain and He is the standard-maker of all things –‘ (3/187-188). It has been made even clearer in another place of the same Sura: The Muslims had to incur some losses in a battle (Uhad). Referring to it, the Quran says: “You said why it had happened to you. Tell them (O Messenger) it happened because of your own selves (doing something wrong) – Allah is the Measurer of all things –“ (3/169).

In Sura Tauba, the Convinced are told: “If you don’t take up arms in Allah’s way, you will get into big problems and Allah will replace you with other people; certainly, Allah is the standard-maker of all things!” (9/39). This point is elaborated elsewhere in the Quran when it refers to the Dissenters who are advised to learn a lesson from past peoples who were destroyed by their own deeds – Surely, Allah knows and controls (through measures and standards) all things – ((35/44).

At  several  places,  the Quran has  illustrated  the Law of Returns through

Allegory of Agriculture

the  allegory  of  agriculture.  Crops  grow on fertile

land according to laws of nature. Barren land doesn’t produce anything even if it gets rain. Natural rule in agriculture is ‘you shall reap what you sow’. It applies to life and death of peoples: ‘So ponder upon the effects of Allah’s bounty (rain) which revives ‘dead’ land. The ‘dead’ (people) are revived in the same way – and He is the standard-maker of all things! — (30/50; 18/45; 41/39). Allah has set measures for life and death here as well as in the hereafter.

Israelites – due entirely to their own misdeeds – fell into degrading slavery of Babylon for about a century. Their national revival and re-acquired freedom is narrated allegorically by the Quran and, then: “Surely, Allah has set standards to all  things —“ (2/259).

The period of Respite fares very importantly regarding the Law of Returns. This period is set by Allah’s laws, e.g., a seed transforming into a fruit-bearing  plant.  The  Quran   illustrates  this   vital  point  in  a  very  expressive  way.  The

The Messenger’s Wish

Messenger (Mohammed) had the mission to

revolutionize mankind. He spent his life through back-breaking and frustrating struggles against all odds. Towards the twilight of his life he was naturally anxious about the result of his efforts. Allah responded thus: “Certainly, We can bring, what We promise, for you to see (but because everything happens according to set laws – Respite and Returns –), your responsibility is to spread (the message) and We have the responsibility of (its result according to set) calculations –“ (13/40).

The god who is not willing to alter His set ‘calculations’ even for His messenger cannot be imagined to ‘do whatever and whenever He likes (whimsically)’. The entire universe functions and operates by set ‘calculations’. Knowledge of  these  calculations  has enabled Man to set foot on the Moon on

Interstellar Life

his very probable way to interstellar travel and eventually,

meeting life out there. Sura AshShura: “Among His (great) signs is that He created the Earth and the planets and spread in both of them living creatures; and He will bring them together when He desires (according to standards and measures set by Him) –“ (43/39).

In verses 5 and 6 of Sura Haj, the phrase ‘certainly, Allah has control (through standards and measure) over all things – (إن الله على كل شيء قدير ) – has been eloquently presented. I quote my interpretation of the two verses from my work Mafhoomul Quran:

Say to them: if you have doubts about the hereafter because you find the idea incredible, ponder for a while on the fact of your own being created from inorganic matter (primary life began in water and evolution has brought it to the point) where procreation is the means of progeny. The womb is impregnated. Then the fetus becomes like a leech, eventually taking shape from a shapeless mass of flesh. The purpose of these stages is to realize the potential of semen. The fetus stays in womb for the time decided by Our plan (مشيئة ), then you are born as a living human child (16/70). Some of you die young, others grow old, and infirm and childish once again.

Apart from the example of your own self, look around. Earth, for instance, is dry and lifeless before we pour rain on it and it suddenly comes alive, fertile and a treat for the eye.

All this proves that Allah does really exit and His law always works towards solid productive results. It can revive lifeless things, so it is not, difficult for it to resurrect the dead.”

Mahfhoomul- Quran pp. 751-752

—- and

Allah has control (through standards) over all things! (22/6)

Summarizing then,  these   are   the  standards  and  measures set  by Allah. The

Allah’s Measures and Standards

physical    universe   follows   them

compulsively, but Man is free to make a choice of either adopting or rejecting them. But, he is not free to alter the natural consequences of his chosen actions. Considerably important is the point that the phrase in question – إن الله على كل شيء قدير – invariably uses the word ‘ things’ (اشياء ). Man appears to be excluded, making him free to chose his actions. Allah does not bind Man by His laws against his will. What he does is entirely Man’s own decision.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed

(Mis) Guidance

Sermons on the occasions of Friday’s congressional prayer, the two Eids (end of Ramadan’s fasting month and Al-Adha to commemorate Ibrahim’s sacrifice on Haj, the annual pilgrimage to Makkah), the Muslim marriage, and others, often recite a verse which is traditionally translated thus:

‘Whoever is guided by Allah cannot go astray, and whoever is misguided by Allah cannot be guided by anyone –‘.

In the light of this translation, please consider the following:

(i)         In  the  story  of  Fall  of  Man,  Allah  told mankind not to worry because:

Chain of Divine Guidance

“Then  I will  keep  sending  guidance  from  Me.

Whoever follows My guidance shall have no fear or frustrated depression. And those who reject and deny My signs will be the people with permanent abode in hellfire – ‘ (2/38-39).

(ii)       True to His promise, Allah started the chain of His messengers to all peoples of the world.

(iii)      The messengers of Allah would bring divine guidance through Revelation to mankind with (the option): ‘So whoever wishes can accept it, and whoever so desires, may reject it (18/29).

These clear verses stand in stark contrast to the interpretation mentioned above of the verse at the head of this chapter. Obviously, it necessitates a deep examination of the situation from the Quranic perspective.

First of all, 2/38 means that Man may discover the physical universe through

Allah alone is the source of guidance

Scientific  study  (observation and

experimentation) but laws for the social universe can only be obtained through divine guidance (Revelation). This fact has been highlighted at various places in the Quran:

(i)    Sura Taha: “Our Preserver is the One who has created all things, then guided them (to their destination)” – (20/50).

(ii)   Sura Al-Aala: “The One who created, then gave (all things their) balance, then set standards (for them), and then guided (them to those laws)” – (87/2-3).

(iii)  Sura Al-Lail: “Certainly, it is Our responsibility to guide” (92/12).

(iv)  Sura Aal-e-Imran: “Tell (them) the (only real) guidance is from Allah” – (3/72); also (2/120 and 6/71).

Furthermore, the physical universe intrinsically has the divine guidance but mankind must obtain it from without. The modus operandi was for Allah to hand His guidance through Revelation to His messengers who then passed it on to men — ‘so that, after the messengers, men cannot blame Allah’ – (4/165); ‘Or people may not say “If Allah had guided us, we would have been law-abiding: “ – (13/7). A messenger’s responsibility was to ‘deliver whatever you have received from your Preserver’ (5/67). ‘Whatever received from the Preserver’ was the Book. The last and final Book of Allah is the Quran which is a guide for all humanity: ‘By this (book) Allah guides, whoever follows it, on to the right path and brings people out of darkness into light and guides them onto the straight, right way’ – (5/16). Thus the divine guidance would be delivered to men with: ‘So whoever is guided, does so for their own selves, and whoever decides to go the wrong way shall bear the consequences’ – (10/108); also (39/41).

This brings us, in brief, to the following

i)       Allah would hand over His guidance to His Messengers through Revelation.

ii)      The messengers would pass it on to men with the option of either accepting or rejecting it.

As to (i)  above,  a  would-be messenger would be chosen unilaterally by

Messengers are chosen by Allah

Allah  alone  according  to  His  plan  of

things (مشيئة ). “And Allah would select, by His plan, whoever He wanted” — (2/105); (3/73); “Only Allah knows who was to be His messenger” – (6/125). The would-be agent had no hand in, or even prior knowledge of, this duty (42/52). This position was bestowed, not earned (16/11).

Therefore, it is clear that divine guidance was revealed to men specially by Allah’s method of guiding men and exclusively chosen by Allah. A messenger could never get it from any other source — “If my Preserver had not guided me, I would have been one of the misguided ones” – (6/78; 6/81). Ordinary men, too, should say, ‘We would never have found the right path if Allah hadn’t guided us; (because) “our Preserver’s messengers came with the Truth –“ (7/43). In other words, “Whoever is guided by Allah (through His revelation to His messengers) is on the right path –“ (7/178). The ‘right path’ is adopting His system contained in His book (the Quran) – Sura Zumer: “Allah sent down (to men) a book with the best of contents. That is His guidance (for) whoever wishes to be guided; and whoever is misguided (by his own choice) can never be guided (by anything or anyone else)!” – (39/23).

– * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

(1) People who can be guided

It has already been stated that, with the exception of Man, everything in the universe follows a pattern of existence pre-decided by Allah. Man has the option to follow the pattern of life suggested by Allah or reject it. This choice should be exercised in the light of knowledge and reason and adopted entirely independently of any physical, intellectual or psychological compulsion. This is called Iman (conviction). Acceptance of this Message through conviction (rational reasoning) is a pre-requisite for benefiting from it (obtaining guidance).

This code of guidance (the Quran) can thus lead mankind through life progressively – “Their Preserver guides them because of their conviction” (10/9).  This fact  is stated  very  early in  the Quran (Sura Baqara): “This is the book which

An objection to ‘هدى للمتقين’  (guidance for ‘The guided’)

is  free  of  all  doubts  (and anxieties).  It  has   guidance   for   the  ‘متقين’    (conventionally

translated as ‘the guided’). This has given rise to some confusion. It is objected that a ‘guided’ person doesn’t really need the guidance offered by the Quran. This dilemma stems from the conventional (non-Quranic) meaning of the term muttaqi (متقي).

People  go  through   life  broadly  in  two  ways.  Some   have   no   specific

Meaning of muttaqi

purpose of life in mind. With no ultimate goal, they are

driven by individual selfish interests based upon lowly emotions. They are not mindful of pitfalls in that path. On the other hand, there are those people who have a final destination of life set for themselves. They necessarily wish to avoid dangerous sharp turns to make their journey smooth and productive. Such are the men referred to as muttaqeen. Thus “هدى للمتقين” means a guidance for those who wish to avoid the dangers and pitfalls of the path of life. This has been reiterated several times in the Quran: Sura Anaam: “People who are convinced (by this message) and keep their conviction free of wrong (ideas and deeds) are guided” (by it) – (6/83); Sura Tauba: “Just following the conventional ‘good deeds’ of one’s society doesn’t bring guidance. It can be obtained by being convinced and following this message (the Quran)” – (9/19-20); Sura Baqara: “Allah’s Book guides by pointing out the right (correct) in case of disputes” – (2/213) – and also: “This book lits the dark path of life and leads the way- ….. to safety” (2/257) – and again: “People who steadfastly face problems, can get guidance (from it)” – (2/157) – the Quran terms it as ‘holding on to the rope of Allah’ – (3/101, 3/102, 4/176). In other words, if one adheres to Allah’s laws against all odds, prosperity and progress open their arms – (4/65-68).

The Quran has summarized the above in Sura Ankaboot: “Those (people) who strive for Us get guided by Us and Our prosperous path” – (26/69); and also: “Allah increases (the facilities) for those who follow the right path –”  (19/76).

(2)  People who cannot be Guided

Allah created Man, set an ultimate destination of his life’s journey, guided him to the right path, complete with signposts. Someone who chooses not to read the signposts, or ignores them, cannot be expected to reach his destination.  For  instance:  (i)  Sura Younis:  “Can  you  (O Messenger!)  guide those who choose to

Those who walk blindly

be  blind  and  not  see?” –  (10/43).  Elsewhere:

“O Messenger! You cannot make the dead listen (to you) nor those who play deaf; nor can you guide the blind. You can only deliver the message to those who are willing to be convinced and accept it” – (27/80-81); (30/52-53). Also: “One cannot talk to those who plug their ears shut” – (31/7). Sura Faater: “The blind and the sighted cannot be the same just as darkness and light are not; sunshine and shade are not the same as not are the dead and the living. O Messenger! You cannot talk to the dead in their graves. Only those will listen who want to” – (35/19-22).

(ii) Sura Nahal: “O Messenger! Despite your strong desire, how can Allah guide those who choose to go the wrong way?” – (16/37). Also: “How can Allah guide those who do not accept the truth of His message?” (16/104); “those who reject it and persuade others to de likewise” – (4/107).

(iii)  As elaborated earlier, Allah has bestowed Man with various faculties and potentialities which are neither good nor evil in their essence. They are neutral till  they  are put to  use one way or the other. Human emotions are no different.

Those who follow their emotional drives

Employed   under   Allah’s

guidance, they can work wonders; unbridled, they wreak havoc. Sura Qasas:  “O Messenger! These people don’t answer your call because they want to follow their lowly drives. Just imagine, who can be more misguided than the one who follows his drives without the guidance from Allah? The wrong-doers cannot benefit from the divine message” – (28/50);  (30/29).

(vi)  The majority of men go through life with unquestioning conformity. If the leader is on the wrong path,  the  led can  never  hope  to  find the right one. Sura An’aam

The Conformists

warns against this conformist attitude of the misled masses

as it leads away from the path of Allah – (6/117; 6/20); (5/77).

(v)   People  who are selective, i. e., keep switching to and away from Allah’s path

The Polytheists

cannot hope to reach their destination. It is shirk in Quranic

terms and it leads to going far away from one’s goal – (4/116).

Conviction,  in  practical   terms,   means  adopting   the  Book  of  Allah in its

The Hypocrites

totality. Being  selective,  or  paying  just lip service to Allah’s

message also keeps one away from one’s destination – (4/60).

(vi)   One who is not really convinced of the validity of the Message but complacently pretends to join the convinced, all the while trying to break away, cannot reach the ultimate destination. Such people are hypocrites (منافق) – (4/142-143).

(vii)    A  transgressor  (فاسق)   is  one  who  breaks  the  pattern  of  life  required  by

The Transgressors

Allah’s message and loses its protective and preservant

environment, much in the way of a decaying fruit. Such people – the transgressors (فاسقين) – cannot hope to be guided by Allah (5/108); (2/26); (9/24). Sura Saff: “When they transgress, Allah (‘s Law of Returns) turns their hearts away; Allah doesn’t guide transgressors”  — (61/5).

(viii)  Success of any project depends upon doing everything properly and appropriately. If things are not where they ought to be, it is termed as Zulm –“Allah

The Unfair

(‘s law) doesn’t guide the Zaalemeen (the unfair)” –(2/258). This

is repeated frequently in the Quran.

Finally, here is the verse which very clearly says it all: “(Just think) How can Allah guide the people who reject His message after having accepted it? They had observed that the Messenger has brought the Truth very clearly; Allah doesn’t guide the unfair people!” – (3/85).

It is important to note that the expression ‘How can Allah guide such people?’ does not refer to an eternally hopeless situation. As long as a group keeps on the wrong path, they cannot hope to arrive at their destination. But when they decide to look for, and choose, Allah’s path, their chances of success increase – (O Messenger) keep reminding them through the Quran that they are following a path of calamities (so that no one is doomed just because nobody invited them to the right path)” – (6/70).


(3) Allah has sealed their hearts

ختم الله على قلوبهم

To understand verses such as the one above, one must be mindful of the following points:

(i)    To benefit   from  Allah’s  guidance,   men  must  think  with  a   cool,  rational,

Receptive Mind

unbiased  and  analytical mind.  An  unreceptive  mind  just

cannot hope to gain anything from Allah’s message – it is a practical impossibility.

(ii)   ‘If you close your eyes, you are in the dark’. The Quran illustrates this in a variety of ways, some of which have already been mentioned. Consequences are natural results of Man’s own actions. Allah attributes them to Himself because they occur according to His Law of Returns. Let us now examine the verses containing such phrases as ‘Allah seals their hearts’.


(i)    Among the opening verses of Sura Baqara are (conventionally translated as): “It does not matter to the Rejecters whether you (O Messenger) warn them or not. They will never accept (the Message). Allah has sealed their hearts and ears and covered their eyes. They are in for a big punishment’ – (2/6-7). Obviously, such a translation is as confusing as ‘a guide for the guided’. It naturally leads to the dilemma. If the non-Muslims are not going to accept the Message, why bother? Moreover, it is all done by Allah, so why punish them? The Quran is free of such conflicts because:

i. a:  People who wish to embark on a safe journey to life’s destination may, and do, get to the heart of this divine guidance and, therefore, are successful — (2/2-5).

i. b:  But those who resolve not to listen to, or care about the Message, cannot benefit from it. They close their eyes and ‘ignore the Right Book in favor of wrong books’ (2/18); they (play and) become dumb, deaf and blind and just don’t heed the calls for a return to the right path – (2/16); they are like sheep, mindlessly following the one in the front. They reject suggestions to apply reason and logic to review their stance with: ‘but we will follow the path on which we found our ancestors (even if they were wrong!) (2/170).

They are just like sheep ignoring their shepherd – “dumb, deaf, blind and mindless” – (2/171). Such are the ones whose hearts get sealed – “They don’t listen to your invitation to guidance; you can see them staring at you but they are not looking!” — (7/198); “It is the same to such people if you call them or say nothing!” (7/193).

(ii)   “These people stubbornly stick to their decision of rejecting the Message” (10/74); “that is how We seal the hearts of such people” (10/74); “they boast about their ‘draped hearts’ but, actually, Allah has sealed their hearts because of their mentality of rejection” (40/155).

(iii)  Then there are those who reject the Message without any reasoning – that is how Allah seals the hearts of the arrogantly stubborn (40/35). They sit to hear the Messenger absent-mindedly and later have to ask other attendees as to what the Messenger was saying. “Such are the people whose hearts are sealed by Allah because they follow their own selfish drives” (47/16). They arrogantly make fun of the warnings of the Messenger dismissing his call as ‘nothing but stories from the past — “they are the ones whose hearts get wrapped (in ignorance) and their ears plugged shut” (6/25). They very rudely dismiss the call of the Messenger with: “Our hearts are draped and our ears plugged shut, so your call doesn’t get through to us; there is a barrier between you and us; therefore, you do what you have to do while we do what we have to” (41/5), “don’t you worry about us!” Such are the people whose hearts get draped and their ears close shut” (14/57). They not only reject the Message themselves but also try to dissuade others, too: “That is how Allah seals the hearts of those who do not know!” (30/58-59). “Thus Allah seals the hearts of those who do not employ knowledge and reason – an invisible barrier is put up between such people and the Quran! (17/45-46).

(iv)  Then there are those who pay lip-service to the cause of the Message but have  not  intention  of  really  committing  themselves. The Quran refers to them as

The Hypocrites

– منافقين –  (the hypocrites).  Sura Tauba refers  to  their evading

tactics to avoid having to enter a battlefield in the service of Allah – these are ones who have “Their hearts sealed by Allah because they don’t know (the Truth)” – (9/93; 9/86-87; 47/20-23).

It is important to note that these Quranic pronouncements are by no means restricted in time. Of course, they refer to the hypocrites at the time but they contain eternal truths. People who just say that they accept the Message, but don’t really do it from the bottom of their hearts, are not Momin (convinced): “Have you noticed the one who chooses as his god his own lowly drives? He goes astray despite having knowledge (and reason). (Consequently,) Allah seals his ears and heart, and covers his eyes closed. He can’t find guidance anywhere but with Allah” – (45/23). “Say, who can guide the one who thus rejects Allah’s guidance? Such people ignore their future for shot-term benefits, which blind them. That’s how their ears and hearts are sealed” – (16/106-108).

(v)   Sura Younis – verse (36/7-10) are conventionally translated thus:

“Allah’s work has come true for many of them. They will never accepts the Call. We have put high collars (of slavery) on them so that their chins are forced up. We have put up barriers in front of, as well as behind, them. We have blinded them by putting a drape over them. Therefore, it doesn’t matter to them whether you warn them or not. They will never accept (the Message).

We  have  already  discussed  this  verse  except the opening part (لقد حق…. لايؤمنون)

which  is said to confound readers because it supports the concept   of  pre-destiny

Allah’s Word Comes True

(‘they  will   never   accept  the Message’).  The

confusion arises from the basically erroneous concept of compulsion. The words ‘Allah’s word has come true’ should be interpreted as: Allah’s law is that Truth does not reveal itself to those who do not employ knowledge and reason to look for it. That is why these people will not accept the Message. “Confusion comes to the ones who do not use their intellect” – (10/100). Their condition proves that Allah’s law (word) is true. “Surely, warnings can benefit only the one who follows Allah’s advice and is afraid (watchful) of the hitherto unrealized consequences of (man’s wrong action which result according to the Law of Returns of) Allah” – (36/11).

Sura A’raaf: (Conventionally translated) “And We have created a lot of Jinns (1) and Men for Hell! Supports the concept of pre-destiny? No. The rest  of the

Created for Hell

verse clears the confusion: “They possess hearts but don’t

use them for thinking, they have eyes but don’t use them to look, they have ears but don’t use them to hear. They are the ones who are like animals, nay, even worse – they are ignorant (and non-caring about the purpose of life) “ – (7/179).

Elsewhere in the Quran: When such people enter Hell, the overseer will inquire as to their crimes. They will respond: “If only we had listened (to Allah’s messengers) or used our brains, we wouldn’t have been among the people of Hell!” – (67/10).

Sura Mohammed: “Don’t they ponder over the Quran? Have their hearts locked themselves shut?” – (47/24). Please note the very important suffix –  ها- (of them) with the word – اقفال – (locks) in this verse. It  very  clearly shows that men seal

Their Hearts Lock Themselves

their  own  hearts  shut  to  calls  of  reason.


(1)    ‘Jinn’ refers to rural people of the desert. For details, please see my work Iblees-o-Adam or Lughaat-al-Quran.

Elsewhere, the same idea is put in other words: “When they went crooked, Allah crooked their hearts” (His law of Returns did it) – (61/5; 51/9; 9/127).

Finally, let me quote a verse from Sura Al-Tatfeef which clarifies the phrase  “Allah  has sealed their hearts”  beyond any shadow of a doubt. It says:

Men’s own deeds act as result

“No, it’s not like that! But (the reality is that)

their hearts get rusted because of their own deeds! (83/14).


(4) –     Whoever So wishes, accept and

whoever so wishes, reject

The human privilege of ‘freedom of choice’ has been previously dealt with in detail. Nonetheless, it is important to have a special brief recap of the Quran’s stance on (mis) Guidance:

One of the basic principles of the Quranic system is: “there is no compulsion in the matter of ‘ad-Deen’ (adopting a philosophy of life) as guidance has been shown very clearly apart from mis-guidance. So, whoever rejects all else, and accepts Allah’s way, will be adhering to a strong support which will never fail him …….” (2/256).

Man’s freedom of choice is not curbed even by Allah himself. The Messenger used to worry about the future of the people and anxiously wanted them to accept. He was told by Allah that He would have created Man bound to natural law like the rest of the universe. But, it was not His plan (مشيئة). So, people cannot be forced into conviction. It is entirely upto them to accept or reject the Message (10/99). “Tell them that your Preserver has sent down the Truth to you. Whoever chooses the right path, shall benefit; whoever chooses the wrong path, shall bear its consequences. You have not been appointed a foreman over them to force them into submission!” (10/108). Every convinced person (مؤمن) should be aware of this fact (that Allah would have created men to willy-nilly follow His path of if it was His plan (مشيئة) – (11/118; 13/31; 16/9; 16/93; 32/13; 42/13). Even the Messenger’s genuine desire for someone to accept the Message doesn’t change the principle of free choice — (28/56). Allah has given Man free will. Therefore,  the Messenger should deliver the Message to people and say: “Whoever so wishes, accept; whoever so wishes, reject” – (18/29). “We created Man, gave him listening and sight, and showed him the way. Now, it is upto men to accept or reject it” – (76/3). “The Quran is a reminder. So, whoever wishes to, may recall (the Truth through it)” – (80/11-12). “We have showed him both the (good and bad) ways. So, whoever so wishes, should take his Preserver’s way” – (73/19; also: 25/57).

Allah gave Man eyes and provided light (the Quran) to see very clearly both the (right and wrong) paths — “Whoever looks, will have benefits for his own self; whoever (chooses to) be blind, will bear the consequences of that action —“ (6/105). “And no one shall carry someone’s load – “ (17/15). “No one shall carry someone else’s load; whoever takes the right path, shall have no fear or frustration —“ (2/38; 20/123). “If you are on the right course, the wrong-doer won’t be able to hurt you. They will only hurt themselves — “ (5/105).

The polytheist assert that they are what they are due to Allah’s will was responded by: “Allah does not misguide anyone” – (6/149, 150); 16/35,36; 43/20). “They misguide themselves” – (6/141). The fact is that just as Allah doesn’t misguide anyone, He doesn’t force anyone onto the right course against their will (16/37).

Allah doesn’t but religious leaders do misguide people as they are themselves  misguided”  –  (5/77;  6/145).   “Thus the  misguided  become a group

The Clergy

supporting each other’s wrong views” (7/202). “In this way, their

leader lead them to an undesirable place – Hell” (14/28, 29).

Therefore, it is Man who does it. Allah doesn’t force the right or the wrong on anyone. It is entirely Man’s own free choice (من شاء). (18/29)


من يشاء  –  Whoever Wants or

Whomever He wants

We have already discussed (من يشاء) in its general sense. Let us now examine it in the specific sense of (mis) guidance. The discussion so far has established that:

(i)         (Mis) guidance depends entirely on Man’s free wil;

(ii)        The right path (Allah’s way) can be taken by using knowledge and reason.

Now, consider the relevant Quranic verses.

Sura Baqara: Originally, mankind was one fraternity. Later, differences and clashes occurred among them. Allah sent down His guidance through His messengers, so “Allah guides onto the right path the one who so desires” – (2/213). The messengers were responsible for delivering the message (5/99; 3/19), not forcing men onto the right path — “It is not your duty to put him on the right path. Allah guides only the one who so wishes” – (2/273 & 28/56). “Allah calls to the land of safety. So, whoever so desires is guided onto the right path” — (10/25). This call was made by the messengers (14/4), on the basis of clear laws and principles revealed to them for the guidance of anyone who wanted it (22/16). This message of Allah has been called ‘noor’ (light) in (24/35, 24/40 and 24/60). Sura Zumr refers to it as ‘the book sent down by Allah’ (39/23). Sura Faater talks about the inequality between the blind and the sighted, the dead and the living, light and darkness, and sunshine and shade, and then — “O Messenger! You can’t make the ‘dead’ hear you. Allah makes listening only for those who want to” – (35/19-22). “Whoever wishes to listen” means: “He guides to Him (only) the one who turns to Him” – (13/27). Contrarily, one who does not want to cannot benefit from Allah’s guidance.

That, therefore, is Allah’s plan (مشيئة) for (mis) guidance. Sura An’aam: “And those who deny Our laws are (like) deaf and dumb in the dark. Whoever so desires, Allah misguides him; and the one who so wishes, finds himself on the right path” — (6/39). Sura Ibrahim explains the right and the wrong concepts of life by the example of good and bad trees; people who accept the right concept of life get benefits here and in the hereafter; “the unfair are misguided (according to Allah’s law); He does whatever He wishes (His discretion in formulating laws is unquestionable) – “ (14/27).

Sura Faater talks about those who view their wrong deeds as right and wish to adhere to their erroneous, self-deceptive ways. Such people cannot gain access to guidance, success and prosperity. Allah said to the Messenger: “Don’t torture yourself with woe over their plight. Allah (‘s law) is aware of their (erroneous) deeds” – (35/8).

As pointed out earlier in this book, on the advent of Islam, some suggested using miracles to convince the dissenters. The Quran responded by saying that it was not Allah’s plan. Allah wants people to accept the Message of their own free will by employing knowledge and reason – “No one shall be convinced until it is according to Allah’s wish (plan), and (sadly) so many of the people are ignorant” – (6/112).

Sura Mudasser announces that success and prosperity come to those who accept the Message from the bottom of their hearts. A confused, half-hearted acceptance does not guarantee on the guidance the right path – “in this way, Allah’s plan misleads whoever so wishes and guides whoever so desires” – (74/31).

That is the interpretation of verses like (7/155): “O Allah! You misguide or guide according to your Message – “ (7/155).

Sura Shoura said to the Messenger: You have been appointed messenger without your wanting it or working for it; you guide people (by this message) on to the right path; but your brief is just to guide, not fore people into it; “We guide by this message those among our creatures (men) who wish to be guided” – (42/32).

Finally, I present from Sura Nahal a verse which is the final word on the matter. “If Allah had so desired, He would have created all of you as one group; but He misleads or guides whoever wishes so — and surely you will be held responsible for your deeds!” – (16/93). Obviously, Man has the freedom of choice; hence his accountability. This is precisely the argument presented by Iblees when he denied his responsibility for disobedience: “You (Allah) have misguided me!” – (7/16; 15/39). That is the stance of Devil not Man!

A Review

Hopefully, I have by now doubtlessly established my view on the matter: It is erroneous to take the position that Allah (mis) guides people at will and whimsically. Therefore, one must not take a Quranic verse in isolation to study it. The Quran should be studied under topics — keeping in view all the verses dealing with a certain subject and interpreting not translating them in the light of the overall message of the Book. Let me briefly remind the reader once again that: wherever the Quran, in regards to human social system, mentions Allah the doer, it really mean that occurrences take place according to His laws and plan. (مشيئة) For instance, have another look at some verses:

(i)           Sura Beni Israel: (17/97-98)

Conventional Translation: “Only he can be guided whom Allah guides; one who is misled by Allah has not hope but He; On the Judgment Day, We shall raise him face down, deaf, dumb and blind. Hell will be the abode for such people. That is their lot because they denied Our signs.

Suggested Interpretation:  Whoever accepts the validity of Allah’s laws is guided; whoever refuses to accept them just cannot find the right path (because guidance to the right path is available nowhere else). Such arrogant and ignorant decisions keep men misguided and hence in a state of hell.

Also see verses (7/178; 18/7 and 39/37) in this regard.

In the Quran, we come across “Allah’s Most Beautiful Names” (الأسماء الحسنى). These are attributes of Allah mentioned in the Book. My reader may have come across the well-known practice of displaying 99 names of Allah. One of those is Al-Muddil (the Mis-leader). The Quran  has not  used  this  particular name. It appears

Al-Muddil – one of Allah’s Names

to   have   been   derived   from  verses

containing expressions like (يضل) (He misleads). We have discussed the interpretation of such verses. In view of that, my personal opinion is that Allah must not be called (المضل) (the Misleader). He is (الهادي) the Guide. The two attributes are contradictory to each other. The Quran uses the term for Devil. Sura Qasas records the event when Moses punched a Copt dead, and said: ‘This is Devil’s doing. Surely, he is (Man’s) adversary and clear misleader – (28/15).

Also: ‘The Devil wants to mislead them (people) far away (from the right path) – (4/60).

Similarly, some others of the traditional 99 names of Allah should be scraped from the list, e.g., (المذل) (the Degrader) and (الضار) (the Harmer – one who harms).

(ii)        Sura Al-An’aam: (6/39)

Conventional Translation (of a part of the verse) is: “Allah mis-leads whomever He desires, and guides whomever He wishes onto the right path”.

Suggested Interpretation: ‘(Mis) Guidance occurs according to Allah’s law and plan (مشيئة). It is men’s choice to adopt the right or the wrong path”.

The plan (مشيئة) is mentioned in the earlier part of the verse: “Those who deny our Message remain (in the dark because they choose to be) deaf and dumb”.

(iii)       Sura Ar-Rome: (30/29)

Conventional Translation: “Who can guide the one misled by Allah?

Suggested Interpretation: (The earlier part of the verse explains it) “These unfair (people) so ignorantly keep following their own animalistic drives. Now, who can guide such people?

(vi)       Sura Tauba: “It is not befitting for Allah to mislead people after having sent them His guidance for a watchful life” (9/115)

(v)        Sura An’aam: (6/126)

Conventional Translation: “When Allah intends to guide someone He opens his heart for Islam; when He decides to mislead someone, He squeezes his heart narrow as if he was having a steep rise into the skies”

Suggested Interpretation: The verse before this one refers to those who keep finding fault with the Message; they get a consequential heavy punishment. This follows by the verse above (7/126) which goes on to say: “That is how Truth is not revealed to those who do not accept the Message.

Sura An-Nahal talks about someone who accepts the Message and later returns to (كفر) a state of denial and is punished for it. Please note that this does not apply to someone who accepts Islam sincerely and is forced into an act of denial. This is about one who “opens heart for denial “ – (16/106).

Therefore, Man alone opens his heart for Islam or Kufr. If he accepts Islam, he benefits. Otherwise, he is in a loss. “That is guidance of Allah by this Message for whoever so wishes; and one who is misled (by Allah’s law & plan) cannot get guidance — “ (39/22-23)/

“One who wants to remain misled is not (forcibly) guided by Allah —“ (16/37) and:

“Those who struggle and strive for Us, We guide them to our ways – “ (29/69). This is the established system of the Quran.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


The idea that Allah directly controls the distribution of wealth is the most damaging, of all generated by the concept of Compulsion. It is believed that : Allah makes individuals (as well as peoples) rich or poor at His own sweet will. The poor must not feel jealous of the rich. To desire to acquire somebody else’s wealth  tantamounts  to   complaining   against  Allah’s  decision. That is dissent.

In Praise of Poverty

One must be content with whatever state Allah keeps

one in. To unflinchingly accept Allah’s will is the way of His chosen people. Contentment is an invaluable asset. Allah likes penury. The worldly wealth is like dead meat and only dogs desire it. It may be possible for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle but not for the wealthy to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Messengers of Allah, saints, exalted men, were all poor. The Messenger of Allah (Mohammed) says: ” Poverty is my pride “. Elsewhere, he says: “Islam originally flourished among the poor and so it shall in the end “. Baba Fareed Ganjshakar (a saintly figure of yesteryears’ sub-continent), when complained to, of poverty, by one of his followers, took him to a pond of water. Lambs who had sated themselves with water were having a deep snoring sleep, whereas the thirsty ones were desperately trying to get water. The saint told the follower: “Do you see, son, the difference of wealth and poverty? The wealthy become careless of Allah but the poor keep in constant touch with Him.”

Such are the anecdotes popularized by the religious to lull the poor to sleep so that they remain oblivious of all the exploitation committed against them by the rich. The entire concept is anti-Quranic, but it is said to be supported by the Quran! Let us see what Quran really says in this regard.


The Arabic word rizq (رزق) refers to means of livelihood (necessities of life). In addition to rizq, the Quran has used terms like fadl and ma’ash.

The position of rizq is the same as that of guidance, treated in detail in the previous chapter. That is, Allah has said that: “We have sent you (men) on Earth which is well supplied by the means of your livelihood. Heat, light, air, water and food were all here even before your arrival (“We give your sustenance”). But just like our guidance, you need to work to obtain the necessities of your life. We have formulated certain laws about that, too. Whoever strives accordingly, shall get wealth. Birth of a human child is simultaneous to production of milk in the mother’ breasts, but, if the mother abandons the child, it will die of hunger – We do NOT feed him even a single drop! Just look at Our system. Initially, mother’s milk is more watery than fatty to suit the infant’s digestive capabilities. Gradually, however, mother’s milk becomes more fatty until the time comes when the child has teeth and is able to digest other food. Mother’s breasts go dry. Now, parents have to work to get food for the child.

So much for ’rizq given by Allah’ on the individual level. On the group-level,  the  situation  is  not  very  different.  Our  planet, Earth,  contains wealth in

Distribution of Wealth

raw form. Man has to find and retrieve it. This takes

place under natural laws (formulated by Allah). In the first instance, personal work is required. Later, the question arises of distributing the wealth so obtained in a social context. This is where the situation gets complicated. It is here that Man needs Allah’s guidance. If rizq is distributed in the light of Allah’s guidance (the System of Providence), every individual gets sustenance peacefully and with self-respect. Otherwise (if rizq is distributed under a man-made system), society becomes a living Hell (as is the current situation of the globe). Let us see what the Quran says about it all.

x – x – x – x – x – x – x – x – x –

1.  ’Allah Gives you Sustenance’  والله يرزقكم

Allah says in the Quran: “There is none among the living on Earth whose sustenance is  not upon  Allah — “ (11/6);  elsewhere,  Man and  other  creatures

Responsibility of Providing Sustenance

are mentioned separately (29/60);

Sura Rome: “Allah is the one who creates you all and then provides you sustenance — “ (30/40); Sura An’aam: “We sustain you and your off-springs — “ (6/152, 17/31).

This provision of sustenance by Allah is not done directly by Him because not only other creatures but also men die by the million in a famine. The current distribution and availability of food to Mankind on this planet is a living contradiction of the view that Allah carries out this responsibility directly. It really means that He has created the means of wealth — “We  put  you  in  place  on the

Natural System of Food Production

Earth  and  for  you made  in it means of

sustenance “ (7/10; 15/20). Earth has been given the potential of producing food. He sends down rain which helps to produce food — “Allah is the one who created the skies and the Earth, and sends down from the sky rain and so brings out from it a variety of sustenance for you — “ (14/32);  “He provides sustenance for you from the sky and the Earth —  “ (35/3); also: (2/22, 10/31, 27/64, 34/36, 40/13, 45/5, 50/11, 51/22, 80/25-32);  “Who can provide you food if Allah turns these sources of sustenance off?  “ (67/21, 63/30, 56/63-73); “The Earth has an infinite potential of yielding food, but at a given time, only a finite amount may be obtained —  “And We have stores of every thing but We don’t send  those down (bring out of the Earth) except according to known measure —  “ (15/21). The term ’known measure’ (قدر معلوم) clearly refers to established ways and means (natural laws) open to Man’s discovery and application. Elsewhere in the Quran, it is referred to as of His plan (ما يشاء);  “the reason for restricted yield of food is to check greedy oppressors among men” (42/27).

Having seen the ’known measure’, let us move one step further

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

2. Conditions for Obtaining Sustenance

The equation of natural resources and human effort to obtain sustenance has very eloquently been presented in Sura Waaqea:

“Consider your contribution against Our laws in agriculture. You plow a field and sow seeds. Who produces crops from seeds, you or We?

Who looks after crops? A calamity may fall and destroy a crop, leaving you shocked and sympathizing with your fellows and agonizing over the comprehensive loss of not only crops but also of seeds and hard work!

Consider water which is essential not only for crops but also for your own existence. Do you bring it down from clouds or do We? Clouds are formed from salty sea-water which is unusable for either farming or your own consumption. What could you do if rain-water was as salty? Why can’t you arrive at the right conclusion in such a clear and simple matter? Why can’t you appreciate Allah’s systems?

Consider fire which you use in so many ways. Who has caged heat (in firewood) in that manner? You or We?

We have created all this (you only provide work). We state these facts to remind you of that forgotten truth that We have put all this, in place so that the needy get sustenance. “

(56/63-73) – from MafhoomulQuran

In the early part of mankind’s life, food comprised mainly of the hunted animals and general natural produce of the earth. Then came the era of human handiwork. But, manufacture depends on raw material obtained from the earth. Therefore, the earth is the primary source of all sustenance (wealth).

The early period of human civilization saw the Barter System as the established way of trading. Later, coins were invented whereby precious metals (gold, sliver) were used to buy necessities of life. Thus wealth (money) acquired purchasing power which started a series of  complications  of  ever-increasing complicity.  From  then on ’Obtaining Sustenance’  was  taken  to mean money /

Wealth included in rizq

wealth as well as ‘obtaining food’. So much so

that in the present age, obtaining sustenance from the earth has become secondary to earning wealth. Money is the measure of richness and poverty as well as the reward of labor. The ’potential of earning’ (making money) means human intelligence, knowledge, experience, ability to understand and use the economic and monetary system, and least of all, work. Work is not always a factor!

The Quran declares desire and work as fundamental to obtaining rizq. It is termed as “ابتغاء فضل الله” : the search for divinely-gifted sustenance. The Quran cites the revolutionary movement of Earth to create day and night as one of His signs; they

Search for Sustenance

have been made bright “ so that you can search your

Preserver’s bounty (rizq) “. (17/12) Incidentally, the expression – ابتغاء – refers to search as well as intention (plan), effort and achievement. With regards to search for sustenance, a special mention is made of boats which were the best means of transportation at the time. Sea-vessels are quite important even today.  “You see the boats sailing briskly in sea so that you can search His bounty — “ (16.14); also: (30/46; 35/12; 45/12). This search for sustenance is necessary for the convinced and the dissenters alike. Hence, one of the characteristics of the Messenger and his group is that “They search Allah’s bounty (and His approval) “ — (48/29; 73/20). It even becomes obligatory for the convinced: “When you have finished as-Sala, spread in the earth and search Allah’s bounty — “ (62/10).

As a result of this effort, sustenance will come according to natural laws, which make no distinction between Muslim and non-Muslim. Whoever farms under the right agricultural laws shall reap a good harvest.  The Quran explains  it

No distinction

all:  “Whoever  wants to  have short term benefits  gets them

according to Our plan established by Our will; and whoever desires and strives for long-term benefits as well, and is also convinced of Our message, gets his efforts produce results; We bestow from your Preserver’s bounty, according to everyone’s effort; your Preserver’s bounty is not forbidden (or restricted) to anyone — “ (17/18-20). Sura Shora reiterates this fact thus: “Whoever wishes benefits of future gets his crop yield more by Us; and We give, according to one’s effort, short-term benefits to the one who so desires, but they don’t get anything in future (42/20). That, then, is the Divine Law (Plan – مشيئة) governing the distribution  of rizq: “Whoever  (individual or group)  ignores Our  laws  shall have

Ignoring Natural Laws Results in Food Shortages

(or its) sustenance restricted — “ (20/124), and then  goes on  to say:  “and We will have  him (or

them) raise blind on the Day of Judgment“. It is clear, therefore, that rizq gets available to anyone who works according to natural laws. This is the principle sent to mankind through each and very messenger of Allah. The Quran says about the Jews and the Christians of the time that: “If they had kept to the Tora and the Bible, and whatever Allah has sent down, they would have had plenty of rizq (from ’up and down’) — “ (5/66; 7/96) Such abundance of rizq is termed as Allah’s favor and bounty. It was said about the tribe Quresh that they should accept & follow the system of the Preserver of Kaaba who ’gave them food to satisfy hunger and protected them from fear“ (106/4). Contrary to this, hunger and fear have been called Allah’s punishment.

Hunger is Allah’s Punishment

Sura Nahal says:

“Allah explains it with the example of a township. It was in peace and contentment. ’Rizq’ came to them in plenty from all four directions. They denied and rejected these bounties of Allah. So, Allah had them taste the calamities of hunger and fear. It was all due to their own deeds! (16/112).

Similarly, it talks about the people of Saba. They were prosperous but ignored to take proper care of  their  crops  and  orchids. So, they were all destroyed  (34/15-16).

Then the Quran goes on to say that when men face shortage of sustenance, they blame Allah for afflicting them without cause. It is said,  “Tell them that Allah doesn’t degrade anyone without due reason. It is all because of Man’s own wrong system and errors of deeds. You did not accord due respect to the lonely of society; you did not arrange to feed the hungry and were greedy. That is why you were destroyed– “89/16-20). Since hunger and degradation are Allah’s  punishment,  one characteristic of  the convinced (مؤمنين) is  that  they get respect-

Respectable Sustenance

able sustenance (as well as Protection) – (8/74);

also: 8/4; 22/50; 33/31; 34/4. This respectable sustenance was desired even by Allah’s messengers. The founder of Kaaba – The first-ever House of Allah – wished, after having just completed the task of erecting the sacred cubicle:

“O Allah of Universe! I have settled my progeny in this barren land so that they look after Your House. Please see that they keep getting sustenance and never remain hungry — “ (14/37; 28/57;2/126)

That is the ’The food from the sky’ requested for his followers by Christ (5/114).

We have seen that rizq is available to anyone who strives for it. But, the fact is that we observe someone who struggles very hard but remains poor and his family go hungry. On the contrary, someone doesn’t do any work but lives in prosperity and comfort. Why is that? Let us see.


3.  Distribution of rizq (The Economic System)

We shall now look at the intriguing question raised above:

Why  do  some  remain  destitute  despite  bone-shaking  hard  work and others

Riches and Poverty

enjoy affluence without doing any at all?

Hindu mythology finds the answer in reincarnation: One’s present financial state depends on the kind of life one has had in the previous one. This state of affairs is unchangeable since it is deemed by Eshwar Paramatma, the Supreme God.

The Muslim preacher explains it through pre-destiny. Richness and penury are directly  ordained  by  Allah.  Destiny   is   unchangeable  no matter how hard one

The Quran’s answer

tries.  But  the  Quran says:  It  is  all  because of their

deeds! It is all because of the unfair economic set-up human have adopted. Armed  robbers pick-pockets and thieves,  for instance,  deprive  people   of  their

Unfair Economic System

hard  earned  wealth.  On  the  group  level,  the

thievery & robbery are less visible — a feudal land-owner or an industrialist exploiting the hard-work of the farm-workers and factory-workers, respectively. There are some intriguing questions, regarding the economic system we currently have, nobody bothers to think about, let alone try to answer – Who fixes the rate of payment for a farmer, laborer etc.? How it is done and on what basis? Who controls prices, and on what basis is it done?

Obviously, it is all done by men. Destiny, reincarnation etc. have absolutely nothing to do with it. Allah does not distribute wealth directly. He has provided Man with rizq. But, the fair distribution of it is to be done by Man not by Allah! If it is done according to the system suggested by Allah, no man will go without sustenance. On the other hand, if it is done according to man-made systems, human society will turn into a den of beasts!

It is not the right place to go  into the details of the Quranic Economic System. I

Quran’s Economic System

have treated this very important subject in detail

in my works like Nazaam-e-Rubobiyat (The System of Providence), Khuda aur Sarmayadar (God and the Capitalist), etc. Here, I shall confine myself to a few fundamental points.

(i)      The Earth, the basic source of sustenance, is to provide necessities of life to all men. The question of private ownership of land, therefore, does not simply arise. The Quran calls it Allah’s earth (11/54); “Everything in it has been created for you all “ (2/29); “We have produced in it for you all means of life — “ (7/10; 15/20; it is “sustenance for people “ – (50/11); therefore, it should remain accessible to all the needy (41/10).

The ’owners’ of land today have simply inherited it from past men and their unfair system. In the Quranic system, land belongs to on one. It is in the custody of society (government or state) which organizes a system which yields optimum produce which is distributed fairly on the basis of need.

(ii)        Money was invented to replace the barter system to make life easier. People began to hoard money and use it to exploit their fellow men. In economic terms, capital replaced work as the basis of return. This is the capitalistic system of economy in which money generates money. In Quranic terms, this is usury (interest) which is ’declaration of war’ against the Quranic economic system (2/275-279).

In very clear terms, the Quran has dubbed hoarding of wealth as gathering fuel for the hellfire in which humanity is burned to ashes (9/34-35); (70/15-18). Money should circulate in society, not among just the upper strata but like blood circulates in the body – (59/7). Thus, in the Quranic society, no one ever possesses money (wealth) more than what is needed (2/219).

(iii)      The capacity of producing sustenance (wealth), i.e., work varies from person to person. This difference should be used to have various social functions performed conveniently and usefully. This is called ’division of labor’ (43/32). Individuals should work according to their various capacities and the produce should be distributed on the basis of need (16/76; 16/53). It is inhuman capitalism (represented in the Quran by the ancient Egyptian capitalist Qaroon in the Pharoanic court) in which the concept of keeping one’s earning to oneself thrives (28/78). This mentality is the cause of all problems and chaos (39/49).

(iv)       The Quranic economic system is put in place by a government which is committed to implement Allah’s laws. It is called ’The Islamic State’, in which men fulfill Allah’s promise of ’giving rizq to you as well as your progeny’. In this state no individual goes without the necessities of life nor anyone possesses wealth more than what is needed.

(v)        Such a state is established by men who ’sell their selves and wealth in return for a promise of paradise (9/111). Here (in this physical life) this ’paradise’ is materialized by the Islamic State and in the hereafter it is done according to Allah’s plan (مشيئة).

That, then, is the system in which no one is complainant of their ’destiny’ for want of unfulfilled needs. No individual is dependent upon, or in bondage to another individual — everyone gets ‘rizq’ with respect. Sustenance is no doubt provided by wrong (anti-Quranic) systems, but in these, the prosperous ‘haves’ become intoxicated with power resulting from affluence achieved without having to work for it. That destroys the society (28/58); the low-income groups fall natural prey to ills of poverty —- the ills which ’restrict sustenance and they are raised on the Day of Judgment blind (20/124; 17/72). Contrary to this, the Rizq obtained according to Allah’s laws is ‘good and lasting’ (20/131). Individuals get more than they work for, i. e., all their needs are met. Such a society is established so that “Allah gives them the return of their deeds in a better way, and even more from His bounty” –; thus Allah gives, according to His plan, without estimates (more than you can think of in your terms!) (24/38). That is why Allah calls Himself ‘the best of all sustenance providers’ (23/72; 62/11).

Let us now try to see who among men are likely to establish such a state and how.


4. He Gives Sustenance Beyond Estimate

We have just seen that:

i)    Allah created Man and provided him the sources and means of sustenance.

ii)   but sustenance can be obtained only by working to Allah’s (natural) laws,

iii) the distribution of sustenance thus obtained is quite an important matter; it     can be dealt with neither through natural laws nor human intellect; it requires Revelation, i. e., divine guidance,

iv) Laws of Nature and Laws of Revelation are both termed as –  مشيئة الله- (Allah’s Plan), i. e., laws which Allah has formulated and established, through His own exclusive discretion, for human society,

v)  In regards to rizq, whenever the Quran uses the phrase – من يشاء – the context will decide the subject (Allah or Man) of the sentence. When the subject is Allah, it means sustenance is made available according to Allah’s Plan. When The subject is Man it means whoever follows Allah’s laws shall thrive; whoever chooses to go against His laws, shall fall into destruction and degrading poverty.

Sura Zumr talks about the mentality represented by Qaroon (Korah of the Bible)  and  says that Man is a strange  creature.  When  he is in a  problem, he calls out

What  من يشاء  really means

to  Allah  for  help,  but  when  he  is prosperous

he becomes arrogant and credits his own self exclusively for his gains. This mentality is the root of all evils in human societies. Unfortunately, most men are not aware of it. This mentality is by no means restricted in numbers or time. This is the capitalistic mentality. History provides testimony to the sad truth that this is a destructive mentality — ’calamities came to them because of their own deeds; and whoever among these (your people O Messenger) transgress, shall bring upon themselves calamities because of their own deeds! (39/51).

The Quran goes on to say: “Don’t they know that Allah increases sustenance or scales it down for whoever so desires? This contains signs of truth for people who are convinced (of Allah’s laws) — “ (39/49-52). If the subject of phrase – من يشاء – is taken to be Man (which is my preferred view), it means whoever strives according to natural laws, gets a corresponding amount of sustenance. If the subject is taken to be Allah, it means that increase and decrease in sustenance occur under Allah’s Plan (مشيئة ).

Sura Qasas illustrates this reality by the example of Korah (Qaroon in the Quran).  When  people,  who  used to feel envious of Korah’s riches, witnessed his plight,

Korah’s examples

said:  “Certainly,  the  increase  in  sustenance  for  His

people is done by Him according to scale for whoever so wishes – (28/82).

Sura Rome: “When We (give a) taste of bounty to men, they are very pleased by it, but when calamity comes to them due to their own deeds, they are frustrated. Don’t they see that Allah increases or scales down sustenance for whoever so wishes? Surely, in this are signs for the Convinced” – (30/36-37).

Sura Ra’ad talks about men who violate the contract they have had with Allah by dividing up mankind in groups, are destined for destruction — “Allah increases or decreases rizq according to His Plan — “ (13/26).

Sura Beni Israel talks about good social behavior and says: “Certainly, your Provider increases or decreases sustenance according to His Plan (مشيئة) “ (17/30-33).

A Society established on Quranic principles has its economy based upon

What is Anfaaq ?

anfaaqq  (proper  spending  for greater good  of  society).

This Quranic term is quite meaningful. Its basic root is n-f-q (ن ف ق ). In the older days, money was usually stored in string purses (with only one opening). Naifaq was a purse with two openings. This should explain anfaaq, i. e., an economic system in which money keeps flowing and is available to all the needy,. This availability must be ‘in Allah’s way’ (سبيل الله), i. e., keep one’s earnings available for the needy entirely free of any charge. Therefore, Sura Baqara says: “They ask you how much they should keep available. Tell them: all which is over and above your needs! (2/219). Such an economic system has been compared to a good crop which yields hundred-fold from just one seed. Verses 261-267 of Sura Baqara sing praises of anfaaq in Allah’s way. Elsewhere, it is referred to as ‘giving a loan to Allah’ which is repaid with huge returns (2/245). Sura Saba says: “Tell them that increase in, and scaling down of sustenance is done by my Preserver for His People according to His Plan. Whatever you spend properly, will come back (many-fold); and Allah is the best of sustenance providers”  – (34/39).

We have seen that there are two aspects of increase / decrease in sustenance (rizq),  i. e.,  to obtain it from the earth according to natural laws, and to  distribute

Sustenance ‘without estimates’

It   according   to   permanent  values

established by Allah. This will ensure rizq ‘beyond calculations’ (بغير حساب ). We have also seen that ’without estimate’ does not mean without regulation. It simply means that the result is beyond your (men’s ) expectations and estimates. It has been experienced in Pakistan. Until a few years ago, the old methods of farming yielded an average of 20-25 ’maunds’ (1 manud = 80 kg. Approximately) of wheat per acre of land. When the country adopted modern methods of agriculture (farm machines, special seed, fertilizer, proper irrigation etc.), the yield multiplied 4 to 5 times! But then the vices of the capitalistic system began to show. Price of wheat fell and that of other consumer goods rose. Less wheat sold and it started to be smuggled out of the country. Consequently, prosperity vanished and poverty came in. If the country had distributed this ’without estimate’ rizq according to Allah’s guidance (as it had been produced), the society would have had ’rivers of milk and honey’. The Quran has quite comprehensively presented this fact. It says that when a society is administered by people who are not taken in by individual interest, they uphold Allah’s law by taking on the responsibility of providing sustenance (necessities of life) to people and are always mindful of the destructive consequence of a wrong economic system, the society is rewarded by Allah in a nice way due to their own deeds, and their wealth is increased by His bounty, and Allah gives limitless rizq to whoever so desires — (24/38).

The group of Muslims in the first era of Islam were economically not very well-off. Their opponents (Chiefs of the Quraish tribe) used to make  fun  of  them  that the

The Convinced of the First Era

destitute  were  hoping  to  overcome  the

Roman and Persian empires. Allah said in the Quran that they (the Quraish) simply did not know the reality. The group of Muslims had committed themselves to Allah’s Plan. As a rule, this plan initially requires a lot of hard work – hunger, destitution, loss of life and property, destruction of corps etc. have to be faced (2/155). But, eventually, Allah gives limitless rizq according to His Plan –(2/212). History stands witness to this in the case of the Muslims rising as a nation. They were able to say us: “Verily, You give limitless rizq according to Your Plan!” – (3/26).

By now, the Quranic concept of phrases – من تشاء ، من يشاء – should be quite clear. Nonetheless, I wish to cite two verses to further clarify their meanings. (1) Sura Shora: “Allah is kind and generous to His people. He gives sustenance according to His Plan — whoever desires benefits of future (long-term), We increase his yield for him; whoever wishes to have immediate (short-term) gains, We give him that yield accordingly and he has nothing coming in future (because the distribution of rizq is not done according to Allah’s permanent values) – (42/19-20).

(2) Sura Yaseen:  “When they (the Dissenters) are told to spend for greater good from whatever rizq Allah has given them, they say to the Convinced: Should we feed those who would have been fed by Allah if He so wanted? The response was: “Surely, you are obviously not on the right track! “ (36/47) meaning thereby that  “Allah gives sustenance according to His Plan“ means that men have to arrange for sustenance of men.


“Allah has made some of you better than others in rizq“ – (16/71)

Before moving on, I must explain two verses which, if seen superficially, appear to support the concept of Compulsion. One of the two is 16/71, given in part above. Apparently, it means to say that we observe that certain individuals and groups (nations) are more prosperous than others; therefore, the idea of Compulsion must be right. First of all, the true meaning of (الله فضل ) (Allah has  blessed  should

Meaning of Bounty (فضل)

should be seen. This particular phrase like some

others we have already seen, e.g.,  “Allah seals their hearts shut “—simply means that His blessing with His bounty happens as a result of Man’s deed and according to His established laws (the reader may recall verses 17-21 of Sura Beni  Israel,   which  eventually  says:  “See  how  We better  some  than  others”

It Results from Man’s Own Deeds

(17/21) the emphasis is on the how of it.

It all happens as a result of men’s actions.

The second of the two verses is 43/32 which appears (conventionally) to say:  “In this world’s life, We allocate people’s means of living; and We upgrade some over
We Distribute

others — “  43/23).  In principle,  this  verse   should  also  be

interpreted on the lines of – فضل – in the previous verse. After ‘allocation’, the use of the term ’upgrading’ is made clear by the verse 6/133 which says: “All grading is done according to deeds” — . This is supported by other verses like Sura Nisa (The active have higher grades than the passive – 4/95); and 9/19:  “Migrants and Strivers have high grades than water-suppliers to pilgrims or decoraters of the Holy Mosque.

The reader may be reminded of the two constituent factors of obtaining sustenance from the earth:

Two Basic Factors of

(i)  The  natural  sources  of Earth  (light,  heat,  air,

Earning Sustenance

water,  and  land  etc. )  which are available to Man

absolutely free (Allah’s bounties). The Earth has a variety of climatic and geographical conditions affecting the production of rizq. Man has little or no control over these various conditions.

(ii)  Man’s input — it depends entirely on Man’s will and effort.

The  ‘allocation’  of  rizq  is  dependent  upon  a  combination  of  the two above

Difference in People’s

factors. Regarding individuals, we commonly observe

Capacities & Abilities

differences of capacity and ability, which  are  caused

by the factors like the following:

(i)    Certain mental disorders inherited genetically.

(ii)   Certain physiological disorders developed during pregnancy.

As pointed out earlier, these disorders and deficiencies are natural Medical sciences are gradually progressing in their prevention and treatment. It is difficult to foresee a time when all individuals will have equal potential. However, the fact is that such medical conditions are in no way unchangeable destiny of individuals.

(iii)   The formative years (early childhood training, education and environment).

(d)     The conditions available for children’s development, i.e., schools, syllabi, healthcare, psychology, etc.

(e)     The questions of supply and demand, and facilities available and their use, etc.

Obviously, the factors mentioned above pertain to society where an individual cannot control all of them. They are under compulsion by social restraint created and controlled by other men, not Allah! Since the establishment of a fair society has also been termed ’Allah’s bounty’ by the Quran, individuals getting benefits and advantageous position in such a society is also a ’bounty of Allah’. Therefore, earning of sustenance comprises of the following two factors:

(1) Human input, and

(2) Allah’s bounty (either natural sources or social benefits)

The question, then is: who is responsible for an individual or a group falling behind  others in  life as   result of a shortage of  ’Allah’s bounties’ ? The Quran

Society is responsible

holds  human  society responsible for it. In a Quranic

society, the variance in status, or conditions in general, are too small to matter. The Quran proposes a global united fraternity of men. In a divided world, every group tries to get ahead of others, by hook or crook (16/92). In a globally one society, people who may have better ‘bounties’ than others do not oppress other men: “He is the one who gave you succession of the Earth, and what you’ve been given!”  (6/166). In a fair system, Allah’s bounties are used for universal good: “Whatever is good for (all) mankind, shall survive and stay on Earth “ — (13/17).

Regarding individuals, the Quran proposed a system in which they are not affected by the difference in capacity and ability. These differences shall be used for division of labor alone — “So that people can work for one another” – (43/32). The economic disparity is to be taken care of thus:

“ It is true that people vary in potential to earn the sustenance. But bad individuals take advantage of the unfair social system and keep to themselves, as their personal possession, whatever bounty they get and do not return it to their sub-ordinates who stand in need of it. How can they misuse Allah’s bounty ?” – (16/17).

They should know that they on their own could never have obtained that wealth — a combination of natural resources, social setup and other working men, have all contributed to it. “ Allah’s bounty is not your possession” —  (16/53). It is to be used for the poor and the needy as a matter of right – (70/23-24).

As  to  the  question  of  social  respect,  the Quran founds it not on wealth, but,

Criteria for Respect

according to ‘ the permanent value system’ :

1.         Each and every human being deserves respect just because of being human. — (17/20).

2.         Status in society depends upon one’s input and personal character and qualities — (6/133).

3.         The one who upholds and follows Allah’s laws the best of all is the most respected one — (49/13).

Therefore, the differences of capacity and ability do not affect individuals in the Quranic social system. It all happens because of unfair societies human beings create for themselves and erroneously blame it on Compulsion.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


A verse from Sura Aal-Imran is traditionally translated thus:

“Say you, ‘O Allah!, O Master of the Realm, You give territory to whoever You wish and take away territory from whoever You wish; and you exalt or degrade whoever you want; in Your hand lies all good; Verily, You have control over all things’”  . (3/25)

(Maulana Mahmood al Hasan)

The common man is not usually concerned with reign and empire. Social status, however, is important to most people. In most societies of today’s world, material wealth has come to be the yardstick for one’s social standing. Examples of ‘rags to riches’ (regardless of the means), and vice versa, are increasingly seen as marks of high and low social status, respectively, and as evidence of Allah’s direct control over an individual’s fortune.

Before  attempting  to  interpret  this  particular  verse,  and  others like it, in the

Meanings of Ezza and Zilla

Quranic spirit, let me make a few introductory

points. Primarily, ezza in Arabic means power, intensity & dominance while zilla is subjugation, weakness & breaking down. (The meaning in which these two words are used in Urdu are represented in the Quran by takreem & tawheen, respectively). Secondarily, the material concept of life hold sway over the world today according to which possession of material wealth, and not personal character, guarantees one a high social standing. Also, the traditional interpretation of this verse (that Allah exalts or degrades one at His own sweet will and whim is refuted by the verse itself through (بيدك الخير). (In Your hand lies all good), i.e., degradation, does not stem from Allah.

Let us now discuss the topic proper. Independence, sovereignty etc. have already  been  discussed in  detail in chapter (6) (Destiny of Nations). Here, we

Conditions for achieving sovereign status

should look at the conditions

laid down by the Quran for achieving sovereign status. These conditions (rules) are called ‘Will of Allah’. Sura Anbiaa says: “And We had written in the Zaboor (and, for that matter, in every divine book) – after having given the necessary instructions – that ( as fundamental law) the Earth shall be inherited by Our capable people. This fundamental law embodies a universal message (and truth) for all people who follow Our laws”. (21/105-106).

Thus, the law of inheritance of the Earth very clearly states that only the ‘saleheen’ (the capable) shall rule the Earth. It is a pity, that the term ‘saleheen’ — and subsequently, terms like ‘saleh’ deeds — have been misinterpreted by traditional religionists to mean something very close to the English terms pious, piety, etc. But, in the Quranic sense, ‘saleheen’ are people who have the ability and capability to perform a particular task; ‘saleh’ deeds are acts which develop one’s capabilities. Therefore, ‘saleheen’ inheriting the control of the Earth refers to people who have the double-edged ability of establishing a sovereign state, and maintaining it to establish the Quranic paradisal society (a heaven on earth) for mankind. When a group of people have the physical qualities required, they can establish sovereign states — but minus the Quran, they can be only ruthless despotic anagrams like those of the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt, Gengis Khan of the Mongols, or even the present-day materialistic empires of the world.

On the other hand, a capable group (having the physical qualities as well the guidance of permanent divine values) shall take control of society to carry out divine responsibilities on behalf of Allah — “It is Our promise (firm law) that those of you who become convinced of Allah’s laws, and do ‘saleh’ deeds, shall inherit the control of the Earth …. “ (24/55). Such a state shall establish Allah’s law on earth and it shall be free of fear of depression. It shall be ruled by Allah NOT  by  Man (24/55).  Such  people are reminded by the Quran of the

Importance of Physical Qualities

Importance of maintaining their physical

abilities and qualities (8/60). The Quran has illustrated this natural law with an elaborate   account  of  ‘Beni  Israel’   ( Children  of Israel ).   Having  narrated

The Story of Israelites

the story at several places in the Quran, it said in

Sura Qasas: “and We decided it was time for us to bestow leadership on a nation which had been weakened by being shackled in slavery — “ (28/ 5,6). The expression used for ‘We decided’ (نريد) has two aspects. One is in the realm of ‘amr’ (36/2) where manifestation of His intention follows instantaneously. The other is in the realm of khalq where it undergoes a series of stages and is done by Man. That is why, to manifest this divine program in case of Israelites, Moses was given a comprehensive plan based upon educating and training the enslaved children of Israel. Despite hard work, Moses could not get them to shed their inconsistent and mercurial temperament. Repeatedly, he told them: “Surely, Allah has promised you inheritance of the Earth. But, it doesn’t come easy. It happens according to His law which requires you to develop the required qualities by being steadfast in this mission and being convinced that you shall triumph eventually” – (7/128). The Israelites, however, did not conform, which resulted in: “the promised land was banned for them for forty years …. “ (5/26). Moses was instructed to let them wander in the desert of Sinai while he concentrated on raising the next generation in the right way. Ultimately, when the slavery-minded older generation had been replaced by the new young one, they rapidly took control of the land and thus: “Your Allah’s good word to the Children of Israel came true — because of their steadfastness!” (7/137). “That is how We gave Beni Israel the inheritance of it” (26/59).

The meaning of –من يشاء  – (whoever He wants / whoever wants) is so brilliantly illustrated  in  the  story  of  Saul   (Taloot in  Arabic).  The  Israelites  told  their

The Story of Saul

Messenger  they  were  ready  to go  to war as soon as a

commander was appointed. Their Messenger informed them that Allah had appointed Saul. The Israelites objected to it on grounds of Saul’s low economic status. The Messenger said: “Allah has chosen him over all of you because he has superior qualities of mind and body. Surely, Allah grants realm to whoever He wants; and Allah’s knowledge is vast” (2/247). Saul then set out with his army to confront Goliath (Jaloot in Arabic) verbalising his desire thus: “O our Preserver! Abound us with steadfastness!” (2/250). It was in this encounter that David slew Goliath and thus: “Allah granted him realm …” (2/251). Next, the Quran explains why such armed excursions become necessary: “If Allah does not make men defend other men, oppression will be rife on Earth; but Allah (doesn’t want oppression of His creatures because He) is kind with His bounty to all” (2/251).

It is quite clear that the oppressed are defended by men – not by Allah Himself.

Allah’s is Done by Man

This group of men who shield oppressed men from

the atrocities of fellow men, bear both the physical and human qualities needed for such a task. This is explained in Sura Hajj (22/39-41) where the Convinced are permitted to take up arms. After they had acquired political sovereignty, they were clearly told that Allah will be keeping an eye on their performance (10/14). If they resorted to oppressing tactics, or lost their material prowess, they would be replaced by other better people (“and they will not be like you!” 47/38).

Let us now examine the second half of the verse in question (3/25).  The

Laws for Exaltation & Degradation

Quranic  meaning  of  the  term ‘ezza’

(عزة) is power, dominance, superiority, etc., and that of ‘zilla’ (ذلة) is weakness, subjugation, inferiority, etc. Sura Faatir contains a basic rule in this regard: “Whoever wished to achieve ‘ezza’ (should know that) only Allah has (the laws for real) ‘ezza’. It is the correct and good concept of life which can rise high by apt deeds. Contrarily, people who indulge in bad activities (going against the value-system given by Allah) have a severe punishment in store for them when all their ill-directed efforts are wasted” (35/10).

Sura Younis talks about such people who help Allah in carrying out His program for human society (the Quran terms them ‘awlia Allah’ – Allah’s colleagues) and thus are free of all fear and depression. They act upon the divine system after having been convinced of it. They are set to enjoy the niceties of both worlds. This divine law is unchangeable. Since this is an exalted achievement, they would not be depressed by the discouraging attitude of the opposition because (real) ezza is only with Allah (s’ Laws)” — 10/62-65). Sura Nisaa mentions the Hypocrites who liaise with the opposition of the divine program and asks: “Are they looking for ‘ezza’ ? (Real) Ezza is only with Allah!” (4/139).

Adopting  the  divine  system  is   not  individual-based.  One  must join a

It is a collective effort

society being established for this purpose –“ ‘ezza’

is for Allah. His Messengers and the Convinced” (63/8). Contrarily, “Those who oppose (fight) Allah and His Messenger, are degraded because Allah has ordained triumph for Himself and His messengers; He is mighty and dominant (that is why His shall be done)” – (58/20, 21).

Sura Younis says: “Those  who  do good deeds beget good – and more.

‘Ezza’ from good deed

Their  faces  will  not  be  darkened  with ‘zilla’.

Contrarily, those who do bad deeds beget badness accordingly and zilla will degrade them (10/26, 27). The mighty Children of Israel fell to a life of degradation and misery (‘zilla’ and ‘maskana’) because they rejected the divine law!” (2/61; 3/113).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

‘Ezza’ meaning social esteem and respect (as current among Urdu-speakers)   is   represented  In   the Quran   by ‘takreem’  while  the  term  for

‘Ezza’ as Respect

humiliation and disrespect is ‘tawheen’.

Basically, the Quranic principle in this regard is that respect may only be earned by one’s character and behavior (49/13). “Allah’s sincere men who deserve Paradise because of their deeds are worthy of respect” (37/42).  Sura Yaseen talks about the convinced one who raised the voice of Truth in the face of strong opposition saying, “If only my people knew that Allah has blessed me with bounties and has made me one of the respected” (36/27).

Contrarily, the Quran terms the consequence of wrong deed as – عذاب الهون – or عذاب مهين – the humiliating punishment! Sura Hajj contains the mechanics of such punishment: “And those who reject and refute Our laws are the ones who have a humiliating punishment” (22/57). Elsewhere , people making fun of Allah’s laws are said to get a humiliating punishment (45/9). In principle, it says in Sura Ha’Meem that humiliating punishment is brought upon men by their own deeds (41/17).

The  commonly  accepted  standards  of  respect  and  esteem  in human
Misplaced Standard of Respect

societies  (political  or  economic  power

attained through tyrannical and oppressive means) are totally misplaced. Such respect is destined to end up in humiliating punishment. This law has been illustrated by the Quran with a figurative example of a person, brought into Hell, who will be served extremely humiliating food with a reminder: “Taste (it now, this humiliating punishment). You considered yourself to be very powerful and respectable!” (44/49).

Before  the  Hereafter,  such  misplaced  respect  and power in Here has
عزة الاثـم

been  termed  as    عزة الاثم(2/206)  –  the  weakening  power!  The

‘ezza’ in such cases gives an illusionary sense of respect and power. Really, it leads one to – اثم – (weakness) and results in a humiliating punishment (46/20). In a fair (Quranic) society, ‘ezza’ (power) and  takreem (respect) are achieved on the basis of one’s personal attributes,  character and good deeds

Status according to Deeds

done (46/19);  “Every  respectable  person  is

Respected” (11/3); “Every knowledgeable person attains status accordingly as Allah knows about their deeds (57/11); “And He, because of their work, becomes their colleague (6/128).

We are hopefully ready now to ponder over the topic verse in question (3/25) and look at its Quranic interpretation in the light of all the above:

“Say: ‘O Allah! You possess the (real) power. You give sovereign power to those who follow Your laws and strip of it those who go against them; power and degradation come according to Your rules only. It could not have been haphazard (lawless) because You are the source of Good alone. You have set standards to everything.

Indeed! You are worthy of being Allah!’”

x – x – x – x – x – x – x –
Divine Support and Help

We have already seen the verse (6/128) which says that Allah becomes a colleague of men in their deeds. He is the senior partner (1) in this arrangement. His partnership is known by His support and help (taeed’ and ‘nusra’).

‘Nusra’ in  Arabic  is  used for irrigation of  land through  rain and long,

Meaning of ‘nusra’

winding streams of a  valley.  Obviously,  rain benefits

only those farmers who work according to natural agricultural principles. Therefore, (an individual as well as) a group of people who resolves to carryout the Divine Program, and works accordingly, sees plentiful fruit borne by their efforts: “O Convinced! If you help Allah, He will help you!” (47/7). Man must initiate  a joint-venture  by  Allah  and Man.  Consequently,  Allah  rewards Man

Allah helps those who help Him!

aplenty and with steadfastness (47/7). The

verse goes on to say: “And those who reject have failure and disappointment coming as their efforts do not bear fruit and are wasted” (47/7). “That is so because  they  dislike the (message) given by Allah and that is why their efforts

(1)  The Messenger of Allah (Mohammed) is reported to have said during his last moments: ‘But He is the Senior Partner.’ That is to say that Allah and Man are senior and junior, respectively, partners in this working arrangement.

remain fruitless” (49/7). The Muslims, who had emigrated to Medina in the Divine  Cause,  are  referred  to thus: “They help Allah and His messenger and

hence are true (to their cause and) in their claim of being convinced” (59/8). Elsewhere, such Muslims were referred to thus: “Certainly, Allah helps those who help Him: (22/40). In another instance, this point has been elaborated upon in the following manner:

“Allah is the one who sent His messenger with His guidance, i.e., the really true code of life, so that it triumphs over all false systems no matter how annoying it is to those who want to follow and obey more gods than (the) One.

O the Convinced! Let Us tell you a basic principle. Normally, every person in the world desires to benefit from every transaction they make. But, it is not always so. Wouldn’t you, therefore, like to know of a loss-free business? Let Us tell you of such a business which never fails and thus saves you from severe torture.

It is this: Be convinced of the credibility and permanence of Allah’s Program being established by His messenger. Give your utmost to it – using your wealth – even your lives, if you have to. If you ponder carefully, you will see all the potential profit in this venture.

This value-system will equip you to avert all possible disasters. It will bless you with an ever-lasting paradisical life (allegorically, comfortable abode in ever-green gardens) both Here and in the Hereafter.

That is really a monumental achievement for whoever gets it; furthermore, you will get so much else you like.

Allah’s support and your victories are nigh! O Messenger, give the Convinced these glad tidings!


As we have seen earlier, success in an operation requires 1) a firm conviction and   2)  carrying   the  operation  out  with  the  right   tools   and  in the correct
Swood needed for ‘nusra’

manner. Sura AlHadeed elaborates this point

so eloquently: “We sent our messengers with clear laws – divine books – so that men can have a fair and just society. And we sent down iron (and steel to make swords with, symbolizing law-enforcement power), which is hard and firm and can be very beneficial to mankind if used under divine guidance. This has been done as that Allah can see who among you helps Him and His messenger, convinced of the (hitherto) unseen” (57/25). The Arabic term for ‘unseen’ is (بالغيب ) and here means the expected results, hitherto unrealized and therefore unseen, of efforts to establish the divine program. This very conviction of the future has been put down as the fundamental requirement for success (2/3).

Also, men expect Allah’s help ‘from the unseen’ while He expects the same from men! Aptly, He asks the Convinced to become Allah’s helpers (61/14). Christ said the same to his followers who readily complied. (1)

The first ever practical example of this mutual (Allah and Man) operation was  the  Battle  of  Bedr  which  was  fought  between  the  Convinced trying to

Battle of Bedr

establish the Divine Order (Fighting in the way of Allah) – and

their opponents (Fighting for Transgression). The Quran said, “And Allah thus helps whoever so wishes: (13/12). (It may also be interpreted as: Allah thus helps according to His laws). This help comes rationally not accidentally: “It contains lessons for those who ponder” (3/12). This divine help was to be the source  of  happiness  for  the  Convinced (30/5). The  help  by  angels  in such

(1)  I have dealt in detail with this particular story in my work Shola-e-Mastoor

Help through Angels?

battles  has  been  explained  by  the  Quran  as

psychological (8/9-10) so that they remain steadfast (8/12). This steadfastness brings divine support with the condition that the Convinced display perseverance and obedience of Allah’s laws (3/ 122 – 125). “Your one hundred shall triumph over two hundred of the opponents because ‘Allah is with the steadfast (8/66). The way to ensure divine help is to obey Allah and His messengers, not to quarrel among yourselves because if you squabble, you will be swept away. So, be steadfast; Allah is with the steadfast (8/46). Remember, Allah helps those who remain steadfast; they then become invincible. But, if He abandons you, who is there to help you? (3/159). If you are convinced, in the real sense, you will triumph over all!” (3/138).

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed

‘He Forgives or Punishes Whoever He Wants’

Parts of some verses in the Quran contain phrases like the following:

يغفر لمن يشاء ويعذب من يشاء  (3/128) which are traditionally translated as, ‘Allah forgives whoever He wishes and punishes whoever He wishes’. Such interpretation can only, and has, led to a concept of God who is whimsical, unpredictable, unsystematic and moody. This divine behavior is much like that of earthly absolute monarchs of ‘royal disposition’ in the words of the famous Persian poet Saadi Shirazi. This is quite contrary to the Quranic concept of Allah. Let us have a look at it.

Punishment (عذاب) is usually taken to be eternal fortune in Hell. But, the Quranic use of the term عذاب encompasses much more. Consequences of all wrong human actions – realizable both Here and in the Hereafter — is عذاب in Quranic terms. So much so that a sentence from a court of law is also عذاب .

Maghfara (مغفرة ) does not mean ‘forgiveness’. Linguistically, it means to arrange for protection. Please refer to chapter 4 where we saw that there is a period of wait between an action and its result. If someone uses this period accordingly, the probable bad consequences of an action can be averted. That is مغفرة protection (1).

Let us now see who deserves عذاب and how. Sura Maaeda talks about the sins committed by the Jews and says: “Very bad it is what they have sent on for themselves. They deserve divine punishment   and   shall   be   punished

(1)      I have dealt at length with this subject in my work ‘Jahan-e-Farda’ (Tomorrow’s World), dealing with the Hereafter.

accordingly” (5/80). Sura Aal-e-Imran, after having talked about sins by the Jews – rejecting the Divine Law, murdering their prophets and social reformers – says: “Tell them, O Messenger, of the (impending) torturous punishment” (3/20).

A little further on, the Sura says: “Those who reject the divine laws are punished severely (with عذاب ) in this world and also in the Hereafter” (3/55). Also: “Those who reject Allah’s laws get عذاب in Here and in the Hereafter and can never buy themselves out of it, even if they spend all the money in the world!” (5/36). Sura An’aam says: “Those who deny Our guidance, shall be subjected to punishment (عذاب ) because of their transgression” (6/49). Sura Tauba: “The opponents of the Muslims are under the erroneous arrogance because of their wealth and numbers. This very misconception shall lead them in the battlefield!” (9/52, 9/85). Sura Hood: “These people neither think nor care, nor listen to anyone, nor see where they are going. How can they escape punishment?” (11/18-24, 2/7).

Some verses use ‘rahma’ as an antonym to ‘azaab’. Sura Aal-e-Imran says: “O the Convinced! Take care and not behave like those who, after having had clear guidance from Allah, began squabbling and split up in factions. They are the ones who will get a big punishment when the consequences of all actions will be realized. On that occasion, some faces will come alight (as a result of their good deeds) while others will go dark because they had reverted to rejection of Allah’s laws after having adopted them. They will be told to have the taste of the punishment ‘for your rejection’. The bright faced people, at the same time, shall be under Allah’s ‘rahma’ (safety of protection) – (3/104 – 106).

It is obvious from all the above that punishment comes to men because of  their own actions (Law  of  Returns  or  the Law of Allah’s Will).  The verses

Interpretation of  من يشاء

where  the  subject  of  من يشآء  is  Allah (whosover

He wants) refer to Allah’s Will. Sura A’raaf reports Moses praying to Allah: “O Allah, bestow on us the niceties of Here and the Hereafter!” Allah replied: “(If you wish to avoid My punishment, be informed that) My punishment befalls according to (the Law of) My Will (under systematic rules, not whimsical decisions), As to My ‘rahma’ (Safety of Protection), it covers the entire universe but it is destined only for those among men who abide by Our laws, establish a universal system of sustenance and are fully convinced of the validity of Our laws; also for those who will follow Our illiterate Messenger, mentioned in the Torah and the Bible, who will enact the good and prohibit the bad ….. “ (7/155-156).

Sure Beni Israel: “O Messenger! Tell My adherents to converse nicely among themselves & be fair in their dealings because the Devil wants to split you up in warring factions. Don’t follow him as he is your sworn enemy. Allah knows what you do! If (your deeds are) according to Allah’s will, you will deserve His ‘rahma’ (Safety of Protection); otherwise, punishment (azaab) will befall you. It is entirely upto them to chose between Allah’s ‘rahma’ and ‘azaab’. O Messenger! You have not been appointed to force them to make the right choice! (17/54).

———– x – x – x – x ————

Let us now examine ‘maghfara’.

It can have two applications: 1)  In an epidemic, people with a greater power of resistance escape  it — in the Quranic  set-up, this  type of ‘maghfara’ comes
Two Applications of ‘maghfara’

with precautionary measures men may

take against calamities. 2) The epidemic victimizes one who survives but is left very weak and recovers fully when properly treated – in the Quranic setup, this type of ‘maghfara’ comes with ‘tauba’ (repentance). The Quranic concept of ‘tauba’ may be illustrated by the example of a wayfarer who, taking a wrong turning, goes away from the intended destination. As soon as he realizes the mistake, he turns back and returns to the spot where the wrong turning was taken. This return is known as ‘tauba’ But obviously, returning to the spot of mistake is not enough. One must resume the journey on the right path. That is ‘good deeds’ in the Quranic terms. This concept is elaborated in Sura Nisa: “To Allah ‘tauba’ is for those who happen to make an error due to ignorance but return as soon as they realize it; in that case Allah (His Law) also returns to them .. “ (4/17). Subsequent to this first step, “and then if the returnee does good deeds out of conviction, only then shall he be among the successful” (28/67).

The  other  application  of  ‘maghfara’  is  based  upon   the   principle:
Good Deeds Neutralize Bad One

“Ctertainly, good deeds push away the

bad ones” (11/114). All this should clarify the verse (3/128) at head of this chapter. That is,  whoever  stubbornly   refuses   to  learn  from  mistakes,  gets
Punishment & Forgiveness

‘azzab’;  but  one  who  amends  one’s

mistakes will escape it. It is illustrated in Sura Maaeda where a thief’s punishment is mentioned. The verse goes on to say: “and whoever returns after his wrong deed, and does good, Allah shall return to him. Surely, Allah is the provider of ‘maghfara’ (safety of protection) and ‘rahma’ (niceness)”. But, why should ‘maghfara’ and ‘azaab’ go hand in hand? It is because the Quran wanted to create a realistic balance between the two extremes of the Jewish (all punishment, no forgiveness) and the Christian (all mercy, no punishment) value-systems. The Quran says: “Don’t they know that it is Allah who controls supreme over all universe? He does it through His Laws. Similar divine laws have been suggested for human societies so that the application of punishment (عذاب) and safety of protection (مغفرة) is done according to laws & principles given by Allah” (5/38-40).

It follows, therefore, that a culprit should be punished only if he / she persists in criminal activity. Repentance and reformation must result in forgiveness. “Whether you expose or conceal whatever is in your hearts, Allah takes it all into account. Then, punishment or forgiveness is decided according to His laws – and Allah has set laws for everything” (2/284). Elsewhere: “Whosoever so wishes may get (through one’s actions) punishment (عذاب) or niceness (رحمة) “ (29/21).

Sura  Maaeda  refers  to  the  Jews  and  the  Christians  claiming  to  be

Allah Has No Favorite Offspring

God’s favored children  which  exempted

them from punishment. The Quran replied by asking: “Punishment in the Hereafter aside, why does Allah punish you in Here? Allah has no children, favorite or otherwise. He punishes or protects people according to His laws as to Him alone is the control of the entire universe” (5/18)

The same sura explains: “Allah has promised safety or protection and great rewards to those who are convinced of His laws and then do good deeds accordingly” (5/9). In Sura Fath, after having spoken of the worthy attributes of ‘Mohammed, the Messenger of Allah, and the people with, him says: “Allah has promised safety of protection and great reward to the Convinced who do good deeds” – (48/29). Sura Hood gives safety of protection and great reward as the return of good deeds and steadfastness” – (11/11). This is repeated in (33/35). Sura Ahzaab, after having listed the attributes of Muslim men and women, says: “Allah has for them ready the safety of protection and a great reward” – (33/35).

Contrarily; ‘polytheism’ cannot get safety of protection (4/48; 4/116); “people who commit rejection of Allah’s laws and are unfair, and persist, cannot get ‘maghfara’ “ – (4/168).

The basic principle of reward and punishment is so beautifully given in the following verse:

“Why would Allah punish you if you are convinced of the validity of His laws and use his bounties properly?” (4/147).

Another important aspect of the Quranic system of punishment and forgiveness is  the  individual  circumstances  of  the  accused  involved.  For example,  two
Punishment according to Circumstances

culprits   of  the same  crime

should not have a similar sentence if their individual circumstances differ in background, i.e., upbringing, education, awareness etc. That is why, the Quran proposes that women of possession (1) be given half the normal sentence (4/25), whereas ladies of the Messenger’s family were to be sentenced TWICE of the usual! (33/30-32),

In addition to the individual, collective situation of a society must also be taken into consideration because ‘when vices spread widely in a society, Evil takes  over  (76/7),  sparing  no one from  its effect.  Therefore,  the  Convinced

Collective Punishment

must  safeguard  against  such a  situation:  “and

take care of such an evil as it does not confine itself only to the wrong-doers” .… (8/25). For example, a broken dam floods not only the areas of bad workmen
Individual are Bound by Society

guilty  of  a  faulty  job  but  also  those

completely detached from the situation. That is why the Quran emphasizes reformation of society as a whole which will automatically affect individuals. ‘Al-Deen’ is a social system which brings peace to its members. This was the point made by Omar ibn Al-Khatab, the second Caliph, when he punished the employer whose mistreatment drove some of his employees to stealing food! In another instance, Omar suspended the punishment for stealing food (just enough to quench hunger) during famine.


The misconception that salvation and forgiveness is not dependent upon Man’s  deeds but  on Allah’s whims  and  moods has  sent Muslims  down the

Requests for Forgiveness

deepest  pits  of  destruction  as a nation.  This

(1)      At the advent of Islam, buying, selling and possessing women for concubinage and other purposes, was part of life. The Quran refers to them as ‘those possess by your right hands’. That was to be temporary for all practical purposes. Subsequently, the Quran outlawed the practice.

erroneous idea has led them to beliefs and practices such as this: No matter how many wrong or bad deeds one commits, Allah will forgive one if one recites 33 times the chant of ‘Please Allah, forgive’ after every prayer. The Quranic truth, however, is: “This is the Paradise you are inherited with because of your deeds!” (43/72) Today, Muslims believe that they will enter Paradise only because of Allah’s benevolent mood and momentary sweet will. The fact of the matter is that the Quran has said:

“Do you think you will enter Paradise easily? Nay, you haven’t yet gone through the harsh stages like peoples of by-gone ages – so harsh that the earth shook under their feet and the messenger and his companions wondered when Allah’s help would come! Allah consoled them by glad tidings of the imminent divine support” (2/214).

Mohammed, the Messenger of Allah, is reported to have said: “Paradise exists under the shade of swords!”

Sadly, that is not the end of the story. Incredible as it may appear, the fact is  that  one  of  the  two  most authentic works of Hadith (the Messenger’s
Pride in Sins

tradition), MUSLIM, reports the following from Mohammed:
Sin or Allah will perish you

“By  the  One  who  possesses  my  self,  if you

don’t sin at all, Allah will remove you and replace you with those who will indulge in sins and then seek Allah’s forgiveness”.

No wonder the crime and sin rates are unabated in most Muslim societies!

Adherents to the mystical tradition,  sufis, have reported fantastic stories
Mystics, too!

to make the point. One particular episode: “A devotee, after

having worshipped Allah for twelve years in a jungle, heard the divine: Say what you want? Searching for a reply, he noticed a sage (actually, the Devil) appeared and suggested asking for justice. His request for justice was replied by: ‘OK. You sat and worshipped on a stone for twelve years. Justice demands that this stone sits atop you for twelve years! After those painful twelve years, Allah inquired of his request once again. This time, the mystic, having learned his lesson the hard way, asked for Allah’s benevolence. He was rewarded by appointment to the rank of ‘Qutub’ (a high ranking in the traditional mystic hierarchy), with the admonition:

‘Remember, justice is demanded by the devilish. Muslims always seek Our Benevolence!’

The source of such ideas appears to be the Christian dogmas invented by St. Paul.  In one  of his letters in the  New Testament, he writes: ‘Your have

St. Paul’s Influence

been salvaged because of belief. It is not because of

your deeds. It is God’s gift’ – (Afseeoon, 2/8,9). Elsewhere: ‘Therefore, we conclude that Man is considered righteous because of belief, not because of deeds of religion’ — (To the Romans: 3/28).

This established the Christian dogma of ‘God is Mercy’. Such concepts found their way into Muslim philosophy, supported by fabricated traditions like: ‘No one among you shall enter Paradise because of deeds!’ – (from Taj al Uroos).

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


Among the religionists, a widespread belief is that every person (in fact, every creature) has a pre-determined life span, and that the moment of death is unavoidable as well as unchangeable. This concept of pre-determination is also believed to be applicable to matters of one’s health. But, the fact of the mater is that, the adherents to this belief do everything within their power to cure an illness when it strikes. This  attitude in blatantly  contradictory to the belief held.

Belief and Action

Discrepancy in belief and action is a destroyer of nations.

Thought and practice must go hand in hand. Incidentally, the religionists see a certain psychological advantage in having faith in pre-determination. For example, it is supposed to alleviate fear of death in fighting soldiers.

The  human body,  like  everything,  is subject  to  natural  physical  laws.

Everyone Dies

“Every living being has to die” – (3/184), “Even if you take

refuge inside strong fortresses!” – (4/78). “You cannot run away from it!” – (62/8). So much so that the Messenger himself was told: “They (your opponents) have to die, and so have you!” — (39/31).

Sura Aal-e-Imran says (traditionally translated) in 3/144: “No one can die but  with  Allah’s  izn  (order) –  this  has been written down!”  Please consider
Death through Allah’s ‘izn’

carefully  the  terms ‘izn’,  ‘kitab’  and

‘ajal’ used in this verse (refer to Chapter 6 where the Quranic sense of these terms is given —izn: divine law, ajal: period or end of a period; Kitab: code of law). Thus, the above verse (4/144) means that life and death occur according to divine (natural) law. The time-period spanning a man’s birth and death (ajal) is his age which is determined according to the divine law: “Every period as a law —” (13/38). The end of such a period (death) cannot be shifted forward or backward –“ (63/11). That is ‘death’  is the moment when age (period of time) ends, whenever it occurs. So, the problem of its occurring before or after ‘the determined    moment’  simply  doesn’t  arise.  The  really  relevant   question,
Can Man Control Aging?

therefore, is whether age (time-period between

birth and death) can be shortened or lengthened. ‘Young’ and ‘old’, in connection with age, are relative terms, measured against ‘normal’ age-span of a particular group. It is a known scientific fact that the normal life expectancy in any given group can be controlled through hygiene, eating habits, prevention and treatment of disease, and the standard of living etc. It applies to groups as well as individuals.

This fact is referred to by the Quran as” “Age is not pro-longed or shortened for anyone except according to law —“ (35/11). It is obvious that the precise period of time (age) is not pre-determined.  It can be controlled  through
Rules of Death

natural physical laws mentioned above in addition to factors

like hereditary tendencies, as well as post-natural care, physical and mental well-being etc. These very rules (values) determine one’s, and a group’s, age: “We have established laws of death for you (all) —-“ (56/60). It is Man’s choice to violate, or abide by, those rules: “And don’t put yourselves to death with your (own) hands! — (2/195). Furthermore, the principle in point is amply shown by the punishments (and the difference thereof) for deliberate and accidental killing of a human being – cold-blooded murder is punishable by a sentence while accidental killing may be dealt with ‘blood-money’ —- (4/92-93).

Sura Maaeda: “Whoever kills someone without due cause (cold-blooded murder) or spreads anarchy (treason, mutiny, rebellion etc) really kills the entire mankind. And whoever gives life to one person really gives it to the entire human race!—-“ (5/32). How can a life be saved if it is pre-destined to end at a particular moment in time? This is why battling soldiers are instructed to take precautionary measures for their safety — (4/71). In times of danger, the prayer congregation will be held in groups taking turns in guarding their fellow soldiers (4/102).

= = = = = = = = = = = =

We are left with the problem of fear of death. This can be dealt with by examining,  and  then  accepting,  the  Quranic  concepts  of  life  and  death.  It

Conviction in the Hereafter Eliminates  Fear of  Death

basically says that human existence does not end  with  the  physical  death.  A human  being,

having led a Quranic life, becomes equipped to move into the next evolutionary phase after death: “Death and life have been created so that you can test yourselves for capabilities of better work: — (67/2). Iqbal, Poet of the East, so beautifully puts it one of his Persian works: “A convinced man smiles in the face of death”.

As to the deeds which develop the human potential (for travel to the next phase of  life,  the  basic  principle  is  to uphold a permanent value when it gets
To Die in Allah’s Cause

tangled up in a tie with a physical value. The most

attractive the physical value, the more weighty the deeds to disregard it for a permanent value. The most important physical value, in fact for all life, is self-preservation (saving one’s life). One who puts his life on the line in Allah’s cause deserves the highest merit. Such people do not really die: “But they are alive and your are not aware of it!—“ (2/154). Iqbal, once again, has put it so eloquently in his works to be enjoyed by readers with access to either Persian or Urdu.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


Addressing the Annual TOLU-E-ISLAM Convention in March 1966, I read a paper titled ‘Allah’s Will’. It met with widespread appreciation. Here, I quote from the paper a fictional story meant to illustrate my point about the misfortune of the human female:

‘Noor Khan’s wife had born four girls, one after the other. Each female birth had enveloped the family in a melancholic depression. After the birth of the forth girl, Noor Khan, pressured by his parents and close relatives, had decided to take a second wife. He postponed it only after the wife had woefully pleaded with him, but had told her his firm intention of taking a second wife if she gives birth to one more girl. Unfortunately, she did bear a girl for the fifth time in a row. The wife was having fainting spells due to a sinking heart. The family was annoyed with her. The husband refused even to see her. She used to cry out alone! Female neighbors would visit and console Noor Khan’s wife saying: ‘It is all Allah’s will. He decides who begets male offspring or female. Crying won’t change anything. Nobody can alter what Allah has pre-ordained. Be patient and learn to live with it. No divine action is without goodness. He has every right to decide His creatures’ fate. King Soleman once harbored some disapproving feelings about a divine decision. He was punished to work in a bakery for 12 year years! So, don’t complain! The Almighty applies His law almost inconsiderately!’

Later in the chapter we shall examine the notion ’It is Allah who decides, of  His own sweet will,  who begets  what  (boys or girls).  First,  however, let us

Dejection over Female Births

ponder over widespread reaction, especially

in Oriental societies (in particular among the Muslims of the sub-continent of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh), of despair over the arrival of a female baby. The situation is quite common, by no means restricted to the lower (poor & uneducated) strata of society. Even the claims of broad-mindedness, on the part of the elite, belie undercurrents of the same mood. One reason for this attitude is economic as females are economically dependent on men in a male-dominated  society.  Secondly,  there  is the fundamental  reason  of the female
The Female is Considered Inferior

being considered as naturally inferior to

the male. Let us examine the validity of this particular notion.

The Hindu philosophy treats women like a commodity which remains  in
Women and Religion

a man’s (her father husband and son) possession

all her life. She is not allowed to own anything. She gets whatever she does as charity, not as of right. As a wife, she may have to take more husbands than one. The ‘Mahabhart’ records Dropedy as having five husbands who lost her in a gambling bet! According to ‘Prans’, Narpasi Kamya was wedded to seven men. Another lady with the name of Warkashi was the shared wife of the ten Parchita Brahmin brothers who were well-versed in religious literature. Since the religious code was authored by Brahmins (the highest caste), they enjoy special privileges under law. The holy book ‘Hatherved’ (and also ‘Ragved’) records:

‘A woman claimed as his by a Brahmin is his property even if she has had ten non-Brahmin husbands. It is because Brahmins are the rightful owner of women.

The Torah says:   God  created   Adam  and woman (EVE) was created

Woman in the Torah and Christianity

out of his side (rib) to alleviate his boredom and  loneliness.  Eve  subsequently   got  deceived  by   the

Devil and she tempted Adam who was eventually expelled from Paradise. This story is the basis of the Christian view of woman as the source of all evil. Every human child is born with the original sin of Adam and Eve. The only way to salvation is the belief in Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. The female, being the source of evil, is detestable enough not to be touched. That forms the basis of Christian saints leading a life of celibacy. So much so that early Christian history records a sect called the Valesians who voluntarily castrated themselves to be close to God. The Christian belief that the female cannot enter Paradise presented the problem of Mary. It was resolved by saying that all females shall be transformed into males in the Hereafter. St. Paul preached that the male begot the female rather than the other way round; since the female was created for the male’s sake, she must stay inferior to him in status.

Thinkers of the human race have not treated women any better. Aristotle,  the  original  thinker,  preached  that  women  were  inferior to men in

every  aspect.  He  believed  women had 28  teeth  against

men’s 32! He said, ‘Suffice to say that Woman reflects a flaw in Nature’s plan.’ Pluto used to say: “A good woman is an impossibility. Every other woman is worse than the previous one”. In the modern age, Rousseou, the initiator of concepts like human rights and democracy, said, ‘Woman has been created solely for the purpose of obeying & serving Man and bear his injustice’. Upto the 19th Century, the Western researchers believed that ‘the very first animal to be domesticated by Man was Woman.’ It seems only yesterday that Queen Victoria of Britain, a woman herself indeed, commented angrily on the new movement for the rights of women:

‘Her Majesty the Queen strongly desires to get support and help, oral or written, of all intellectuals who can do something to put an end to this mixture of feminine stupidity and madness. The problem is too infuriating for Her Majesty to contain her anger. God has created men and women differently. Therefore, women must stay within their limits.’

Sadly, the situation has not improved upto the present day. H. L. Mencken writes: ‘The concept of love has been invented to inculcate the false notion that one woman is different from another. This is an illusion. All women are alike C. O. Skinner says: ‘The most fantastic of human concepts is the idea that the female also contains some good’.

At present, the United States represents the apex of human civilization where women are supposed to have been emancipated. It is saddening to note from a semi-official publication, Dialogue (Number 4, volume 3, September 1970), that the research therein tries to prove that women should not be considered equal to men.

The mistreatment of the human female at the hands of the male of the species is  matchless  throughout  the  animal kingdom.  At the advent of Islam,

The Quran

when Christianity  was  the dominant  philosophy,  degradation

of women had reached its peak.

Entered the Quran with a resounding claim that the prevailing notions about women are fabrications of the male mind. They have absolutely nothing to do with reality. Men and women are equally human. “Your Preserver created you from one living being” — (4/1). The biological difference between male and female is of function not of status. They have equal potential as human beings. Sura Ahzab says:

“Both men and women can:


submit completely to the will of Allah,


be members of the group which is convinced of the validity of Allah’s laws to ensure universal peace,


preserve and use their capabilities in the Divine Cause,


practically prove their commitment to Allah’s program,


be steadfast,

Equality of Sexes


improve themselves progressively working for Allah’s plan,


sacrifice for others,


exercise self-control


put their sexuality under Allah’s program,


remember always Allah’s plan and laws,

Allah promises for them safety of protection and a great reward!


Thus covering each and every aspect of human life, the Quran announces: “And whoever does good deeds — male or female –, and is convinced of the Divine Message, shall enter Paradise with none of their deeds going waste!”  — (4/124). Regarding marital life, the Quran treats them absolutely equally as far rights and responsibilities are concerned (ولهن مثل الذي عليهن بالمعروف). The only exception is that, after a divorce or the death of a partner, the male may remarry immediately while the female has to undergo a period of waiting. The reason is very clearly biological — pregnancy.

It is interesting  to note  the purpose of  marital  union put  forward by the

Purpose of Marriage

Quran: “So  that  it breeds  calmness,  closeness and

benevolence between you. In it there is truth for those who care to ponder” – (30/21). Obviously, there can be no mutual love and peace of mind if a marital union is based upon the notion of one partner’s superiority and dominance over the other. As far as Quran is concerned, EQUALITY is the rule regarding men and women.


But later,  as  had  happened  with  religions before, Muslims abandoned
But Later

the Quran pure. Consequently, wrong notions about the female

of the human species infiltrated and eventually became part of the Muslim philosophy. The technique employed to achieve this was, as I have previously mentioned, fabricated traditions of the Messenger of Allah (Mohammed), the most prominent  champion  of equality of human rights. For example, borrowing

Fabricated Traditions

from  old  Testament,  Ibn  Kathir  wrote  in  his

commentary on the Quran:

‘True Tradition has it that woman is created out of (man’s) rib. Since the top-most rib is the most curved, it can only break if you try to straighten it. So, you can use it to your benefit only with the curve there.’

The Authentic Collection By Bokhari reports from Abu Huraira: ‘The Messenger of Allah said: “If the children of Israel were not created, meat would never rot; if Eve was not created no wife would betray her husband!” Another report in Bokhari says: ‘The Messenger said, “After I am no more, no problem will be more damaging to men than women!”’ Yet another report says: ‘The Messenger said, “Three things are ominous – woman, home and horse”’ – (Bokhari; Book of Marriage). The Book of Prophets in Bokhari reports the Messenger as saying: ‘When I visited Paradise, I found the majority to have been the poor; in Hell the majority were women.”

Such fabricated Tradition are also to be found aplenty as far as marital life is concerned.  They put a husband  as an absolute ruler over his wife. Such

Men are QAWWAMOON Over Women

fabrication was supported by certain Quranic verses, suitably interpreted, of course. A well-known

example is the famous verse from Sura Al-Nisa (4/34) which is traditionally translated as: ‘Men are controllers of women’.The Arabic term ‘Qawwamoon’ really means those who provide a sustainable and suitable environment. The verse in question should, therefore, be interpreted as: ‘As women have to spend a considerable amount of their time and energy in bearing and rearing children, men should take on the responsibility of providing the necessities of life’. It is simply division of labor.

It may be interesting to see the background which is traditionally reported for this particular verse. Under the common practice of recording ‘the background of revelation’, it has been reported that: ‘A woman complained to the Messenger that her husband had slapped her. The Messenger had barely finished delivering his ruling of retribution when this verse was revealed, forcing him to cancel his decision!’ Another Tradition says:

The Messenger said, “Don’t hit your wives”. Later, Omar came and said, “Your ruling has encouraged wives to be aggressive to their husbands.” The Messenger permitted wife-beating which resulted in widespread application. Several women came and complained to the Messenger. He said, “It is not nice that you hit your wives.” He wanted to get women the right of retribution but this verse was revealed upholding the ruling that husbands may beat their wives up because they are their lords.

Ash’as reports: “I happened to visit Omar on one occasion. The couple quarreled, by chance. Omar hit his wife. Later, he said to me, “Ash’as, remember three points which I heard from the Messenger and have remembered to this day. One, never ask a husband why he hit his wife. Second, never forget to offer additional prayer (witr) before going to bed at night”. The third point was forgotten by the reporter.

Going a step further, another Tradition reports the Messenger as saying: “I if could order prostration to anyone other than Allah, I would have ordered wives to prostrate (themselves in submission) in front of their husbands!”

Statements  of  a similar  nature  have  been  attributed  to  Ali,  the fourth
Sayings attributed to Ali

Caliph  (successor of Mohammed),  in the  well-

known book Nahaj-al-Belaagha. Ali is reported to have said: ‘O people! Women have faulty beliefs and reason and have less than full share. (Therefore) Keep away from women of loose character, and be careful even of good women! Don’t carry out their instructions even in fair matters so that they don’t expect you to comply in unfair situations.’ Elsewhere, Ali is reported to have said, The female is like a nice well-behaved scorpion – enjoyable to live with but stings whenever she can! Another statement of his is: “Woman is all evil. A bigger evil is that one cannot be without her!” Interestingly there can be found Traditions of a contrasting nature. For example, it is reported that the Messenger said, “Paradise lies under the feet of one’s mother.”

Such Traditions were fabricated in the monarchical era (mainly the Abbasid period) of Muslim history. It was the time when women were treated as a commodity. Ahmed Ameen, the Egyptian, writes in Daha-el-Islam:

Baghdad had commerce of slaves (men and woman). One particular market place was known as Share-Dar-alRafiq (the Slave Market Street). Traders of slaves were known as nakkaas, a term originally used for cattle traders. They worked under an offical inspector known as Qayyam-ar-Rafiq.  Caliph Mutawakkil’s harem had 4000 temporary concubines.

The Persians learnt the philosophy of mysticism from Christians, passing it on to Muslim mystics, who in the manner of Christian monks and Hindu jogis, adopted a life of celibacy because the female was believed to be the source of all evil. Ali Hajveri (a highly respected mystic, popularly known as Daata Ganj Baksh) writes:

‘The very first evil to befall Man in Paradise originated from Woman. The very first evil to appear on Earth (the squabble of Cain and Abel) occurred because of a woman. When Allah wanted to punish the two angels Haroot and Maroot, that, too, was because of a woman. Even today, all religious as well as worldly problems occur because of women!’

It is no wonder, therefore, that the arrival of a baby girl is not exactly exhilarating for the family, and she herself is plagued by a permanent inferiority

Civilized Societies of Today

complex. It  is  tragic  that,  despite  our claims

of being advanced in education and civilization, the despicable situation of maltreatment of the female continues. The age-old tradition of dowry in many Oriental societies is a case in point. Furthermore, according to the prevalent, the so-called Sharia Laws, the husband retains the right of divorcing the wife quite easily at any time he deems convenient for himself. Contrarily, the wife has to go through an excruciatingly humiliating legal process which they often consider to be more painful than their unsuccessful married life! Even when a woman succeeds in getting free from the shackles of such a marital contract, the simple basic question of existence for the rest of their lives stares her squarely and icily in the face. In addition to being financial, the question is also of protection of honor. In most societies even today, a man’s patronage is considered essential for a woman’s protection. Even when a woman does manage to live without male protection, she is under constant threat of  ostracization if the evil elements of society spread rumors about her morals. Kidnappings & rapes are common occurrences. The Quran very eloquently referred to the ignorant Arab practice of burying alive their infant baby girls by asking: “What will your reply when that child will be asked on the Day of Judgment: ‘Why were you killed?’” (81/9). Today’s girls may well ask that from Allah Himself! I have had several young girls and women putting to me the unanswerable query: “Why did Allah made me a female?” “What did my brother do to deserve the better life form of a boy?” Trying to answer this query, the Hindu philosophy put the blame on one’s previous sinful life. The Muslim theological answer is: ‘It is entirely Allah’s own unquestionable will to make a person male or female or bestow an honorific life or strip one of it’. The Hindu philosophy does not blame Brahama (the Supreme God) whereas the Muslim philosophy does! The Muslim ‘God’ appears to be unjust and unfair!

The religionists attempt to support their stand with some examples from
Erroneous Examples from Nature

Nature where animals are not allowed to

question the choice of their sex or species, etc. But such examples should not be applied to the human situation. No animal is concerned with, or even conscience of, status, humiliation, respect etc. Man is self-aware as well as sensitive. The Quran declares Man (both men and women) to be respectable by birth  (17/70). A just God simply could not create the two sexes with different status; He declares: “We are not unjust to Our people!” – (50/29). In actuality, it is us humans who have created for ourselves unjust, unfair and unequal societies. In a Quranic society, the female will not feel, and will not be, inferior to the male. The biological difference between the sexes is for performing various complimentary natural functions. This difference does not affect their human status at all. Status in a Quranic society shall be determined by the quality of one’s performance (46/19), man or woman (3/194)! The natural biological difference should not be a source of jealousy, or even envy (4/32-35). The Quran aims to put a permanent end to partisan human societies, patriarchy or matriarchy, and create a society on the basis of absolute equality of opportunities, rights, responsibilities and merit of performance.

Male and Female Offspring

Verses 49 & 50 of Sura 42 in this regard uses the phrase (من يشاء) and the term (قدير). If (من يشاء) is to be interpreted in the traditional mode to mean ‘to whom He wants’ it should be in agreement with the view of an absolutely equal status of the sexes. Taking the Quranic position of equality of sexes, the phrase means ‘according to His plan (مشيئة), i.e., natural laws of conception fertility, pregnancy and so on. Infertility, for example, is mentioned in the case of Messenger Zakaria’s wife who got treated and was cured before she gave birth to a boy (John) – (21/90). Treatment of sterility is fairly common in today’s medically advanced world.

Extensive medical research is being done in the era of fetal sex. Sura Aal-e-Imran says: “He is the One who gives you shape in wombs according to His plan” – (3/5). Scientists now know how the sex of a baby is determined by Nature. Next, they are trying to discover ways of controlling the process in a way which enables us to choose the sex of a fetus. This ability of Man to discover Nature and use it to his advantage was referred to by the Quran in (2/31). That is what is meant by ‘angels bowing to Man (2/34), i. e., Man can harness the forces of Nature because it is so permanent (30/30).

Thus, Man is gradually becoming the master of his own destiny.

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


In this chapter I propose to tackle one of the most delicate and sensitive issues in the domain of religion, viz. a viz. prayer, be it in the form of certain rituals of worship, or the act of making a request to the Almighty.  It is a sensitive issue because prayer is directly concerned with human sentiments and emotions whereas the Quran suggests the use of reason to tackle life’s problems.

Prayer has been an element of humanity ever since the dawn of history.
Universality of Prayer

It has been one common characteristic of mankind

regardless of time, place, society, philosophy, or the deity involved, or even the rites employed. The            incentive for prayer is asking an invisible mighty power for help. Even worship is invariably a prelude to prayer. Sacrificial or other offerings made to a deity are also conditionally accompanied by a request. Prayer is solace for the wronged, support for the weak, hope for the dismayed, shoulder to cry on for the hurt and the last chance for the hopeless. The more sentimental, devoted and absorbed a prayer feels, the better are the chances considered for the prayer’s success.

I propose to examine critically such an emotional issue because the Quran bases its teaching on reason and logic (even metaphysical phenomena like the Hereafter – 2/219-200). It guides to the path of Allah (the Truth) those who strive to ponder upon it (29/69).

The  prevalent  concept of  prayer  makes  it an activity in which Allah is

The Current Concept of Prayer

requested  to  do, or  give,  something.  But

the Arabic term du’aa (دعا) means to call out to (beckon) someone. As ‘calling out’ is often for help, the term has also come to be used for ‘seeking help’, ‘asking for’, ‘requesting’, etc.

The Quran often uses the same term for both the currently prevalent but erroneous concept as well as the Quranic version of it, for example, ‘Ilaah’ (اله) (to mean an idol as well as Allah) and ‘Ibaada’ (for reverential worship as well as practical adoption of Allah’s law). Similarly, ‘da’aa, yad’oo etc. has been used in the meaning of the idolators calling out to their gods and goddesses for help, as well as for a Muslim to obey Allah. Let us first look at instances in the Quran where this particular term and its derivatives have been used  to mean  ‘obedience  to  Allah’.  Sura Al-Momin: “He   (Allah)   lives  and  give life. Say

Da’aa to mean obedience

(O Messenger!):  I have been forbidden to obey

those whom you call (obey) other than Allah. I have been ordered to submit to the Preserver of all worlds! (40/65,66). Sura Maryam cites Abraham saying to his people: “And I severe connections with those who obey someone other than Allah …” (19/48, 49). Sura Momin: “Your Preserver says to you: ‘Call me and I will answer you. Those who transgress My obedience shall enter Hell, humiliated!’” — (40/60). Sura Toor mentions residents of Paradise answering the query about their deserving the good end by: “Previously (in the worldly life), we used to call (obey) Him”. The Messenger was told: “Say: ‘I only call (obey) my Preserver and do not have anyone sharing with Him! – (72/20). Messenger, in general, beckoned: “and don’t call (obey) any other god along with Allah: — (26/213; 28/88; 72/18). Sura An’aam clearly says to the Messenger to say to men: “After having received such clear guidance, how can I call a god other than Allah? I have been ordered to submit (only) to the Preserver of all worlds!” – (6/71).

Let  us  now  look at the instances  where da’aa  has  been used in the

Da’aa to mean petition

Quran  to  mean  calling  out  to  Allah  (for  help,

guidance, etc.). Before we do that, however, we should look at some of the questions raised by this particular meaning of ‘da’aa’.

The belief in an unchangeable pre-destined life renders da’aa simply futile. For example, the pre-written destiny of a dying patient cannot be altered by praying (da’aa) — believing that prayer can alter destiny negates the original belief of unchangeable destiny! Furthermore, this projects Allah in a strange way — He first decides something (unchangeable destiny) and then waits for prayer by men to change it!

Difficulties also arise with the view that Allah rules by decree – making decisions as events occur. For example, A (right) and B (wrong), involved in a law suit against one another, both pray to Allah for success. Obviously, only one prayer will be answered. Who is it going to be? What if A had not prayed at all? If we take the view that A’s prayer will be answered because he is in the right (which is contrary to our social experience, anyway), then once again, prayer is rendered pointless. Again, one may take the view that, in order to succeed, prayer must be accompanied by proper action. In that case, will B win despite being wrong and A lose despite being right?

These problems are compounded further by the traditional interpretation of the famous verse from Sur Baqara:

“(O Messenger!) when My people ask you about Me, tell them that I am close to them; whenever a caller calls, I respond with a reply.” (2/186)

The problem with this interpretation, as is frequently observed is that it doesn’t hold true in countless cases of oppressed, poor and down-trodden people around the globe. The traditional response to this argument claims that Allah listens to everyone but decides and does what is really good for the petitioner; therefore, an unanswered prayer is actually a blessing in disguise. This response, apart from being unable to satisfy the wronged, has far-reaching undesirable consequences. The oppressed are asked to accept the state of affairs as Allah’s better judgment and take all injustice and unfairness committed against them lying down, silently and happily!

Another  traditionalist  belief  is  that  Allah  answers prayers only of His

Allah listens to His favorites

chosen  people.  This  has  resulted  in  the

proliferation of the so-called ‘intermediaries’ forming a link between Man and Allah. Countless needy people refer to those ‘exalted’ men – dead or alive! — to forward their requests to Allah, with a recommendation.

Obviously,  this  particular  belief is a product of the autocratic period of

Divinity of the king

Muslim  history.  It  was  to the  benefit of  the  absolute

rulers to have the people believe that ‘the king is god’s shadow on earth’. It was, therefore, natural for the masses to imagine Allah in the same mould as they experienced their earthly rulers (His shadows), complete with His divine court, guards, secretaries, intermediaries, and above all, a whimsical process of decision-making.

About the ‘intermediaries’, the Quran says: “They are men just like yourselves“ — (7/194). About dead ‘agents’, (whose graves are so very reverentially visited by millions), it says: “They just can’t hear you. Even if they do, they cannot respond!” – (35/14). Also, “They remain ignorant of whatever you say to them” – (46/5); “They don’t know even about their own resurrection” — (16/21).

How can such dead people help the living?


As  to the  question how,  then,  are  prayers  answered?,   let  us  once

How are prayers answered

again look  at  verse  2/186  which says: “When

My men ask you of Me tell them I am close to them and respond to everyone who calls Me”. It goes on: “If you wish an answer from Me, you must be convinced of My guidance and obey Me. Sura Shura says: Those get their answers who are convinced and do good (proper and fruitful) deeds” – (42/26). Sura Momin: “You call Me, I’ll respond. (But) Those who defy and transgress, they will enter Hell, humiliated!” — (40/60). Sura A’raaf, while talking about ‘calling out to Allah’, says: “He certainly doesn’t like the transgressors” – (7/55). Those who reject the laws of Allah, do not get their prayers answered” – (40/50). Conviction, followed by continuous diligence to adopt and implement His laws, is the fundamental requirement for getting prayers answered. In fact, such men work at it constantly  round the clock and “call out to their Preserver, in hope and despair, and keep available for common use what He has given to them!” — (32/15-16).

Sura Aal-eImran contains a beautiful account of this concept. I quote here my interpretation of it from my work Mafhoom-ul-Quran:

For those who put their reason to use, there are great signs, in the creation of the universe and the cycle of day and night, of the scope and validity of His laws.

It is for those men of reason who constantly keep in view Allah’s laws, be they standing, sitting, or lying down; they keep pondering over the creation of the universe. Their research makes them convinced and say: “O our Preserver! You have created this universe neither in futility nor to destructive purpose. You are too great to have done it so!

Grant us the ability to (benefit properly from the universe as a result of our scientific research and practical experimentation and thus) save ourselves from destruction.

Nations who do not follow this course of action see their efforts wasted away and they plunge into a humiliating, miserable existence with help coming from nowhere.

It is desirable to harness the forces of Nature and use them for the universal sustenance of Man, not for his destruction. This can be done only by a people who are firmly convinced of the divine guidance.

Therefore, these men of reason also say: ‘O our Sustainer! We heard a caller calling us to be convinced of the validity of our Preserver’s laws. We responded to his call and became convinced’.

Then these convinced men of reason desire in their hearts (and they pray): ‘O our Sustainer! Please save us from the consequences of errors we make. Make up for our little slips and mistakes of judgment and application. Please give us the eventual end of a prosperous existence.

O our Preserver! Please keep Your promise You have made, through Your messengers (Divine Revelation), of bestowing us with prosperity and success. Please don’t let us be humiliated on the Dooms Day.

We are sure You are a keeper of promises! (3/189-193).

To all this, Allah’s reply is the following:

‘Their Preserver then responded to them: “(I have heard your prayers, but you must remember that) I don’t waste the work of a worker – man or woman – and respond fully to an action)”’ (3/194).

Let us now make things even clearer by looking at the situation of the

Prayers of Divine Messengers Answered

exalted  messengers  of  Allah

praying and having their prayers answered.

About Noah, it is said that he called out to Allah when his people opposed him vehemently. Allah says: “So We are the best (of those) who answer (prayers)” – (37/75). How did He do it? “We revealed upon him (the way of) constructing an ark”! (23/27).

When Moses was told to free Israelites from the oppressive slavery of the Egyptians, he prayed for divine help in view of the gravity of the commission. Allah answered: “O Moses, We (hereby) grant what you seek” (20/30). “Go you and your brother (to the Pharaoh), with My word; don’t you be lax with it!” – (20/42). Elsewhere; ‘(Allah) said, “I have answered your prayer. So be steadfast and never follow those who do not know’” (10/89).

Again, when Moses prayed for his people to be granted bounties of Here and the Hereafter, he was told it could happen only if “They follow the last Messenger; Our blessing, although encompassing the entire Universe, can be obtained by men if they are convinced of Our laws, abide by them and provide sustenance for others” —(7/156-157).

Zakariya’s prayer for a son was granted right away in principal but materialized only when: “We cured his wife for her” — (21/89-90). It is obvious, therefore, that prayers are answered only when the relevant laws are properly applied. Praying without appropriate action is commented upon in Sura Ra’ad with the allegory of a thirsty person standing inactive on the banks of a river. Such prayers all go wasted (13/14).


A possible comment on the above can be the intriguing question. Does Allah not at all answer prayers of the oppressed?  Does anyone? The Quran’s

Prayer of the Oppressed Answered

reply to this is in the affirmative. Yes,

their prayers are answered. Following is how it happens. Look at a leaf from the Muslim history of the early period.

Years of consistent hard struggle had resulted in the Muslims’ own sovereign rule in the town of Yathrib (Medina). In the meantime, Muslims still trapped in Mecca came under increasing oppression at the hands of the Quresh (the ruling tribe of non-Muslims). The oppressed Muslims prayed to Allah for their salvation. Allah said to the Muslims in Medina: “What has come upon you that you do not take up arms in Allah’s way? The weak men, women and children call out to US.: “O our Preserve! Take us out of this town of transgressors. Please sned some helper and friend for us!” – (4/75).

Clearly, Allah does not help the oppressed directly. He does it indirectly

The Quranic State Answers!

through other men. For the first thirteen years

of the movement, the Muslims’ prayers (under the oppression of the Quresh in Mecca) were answered by words of advice, consolation and suggestions of remaining steadfast, etc. Allah said, “Who is the One who answers the call to Him of the desperate and removes their predicament? He (does it when He) makes you the inheritors of Earth!” – (27/26). Please remember that this inheritance is a result of their convinced good deeds (24/55).

Elsewhere, about the Muslims the Quran says: “They are the ones who respond to their Preserver’s beckoning and establish sala (a comprehensive system of adopting Allah’s system), make decisions through mutual consultation, and keep for common use whatever sustenance they have” — (42/38). This method of ruling through mutual consultation, established to create and sustain a fair and just social order, is the same employed to salvage the Israelites from the shackles of Egyptian bondage. Sura Qasas:

“The Pharaoh had carried transgression to extremes. He operated a policy of ‘divide and rule’ by oppressing and neutralizing the potentially dangerous while promoting the inept and the weak.

Our Law of Returns demanded to bestow upon the oppressed its bounties, i.e., inheritance of, and power in, the land where they could have their own sovereign government.” — (28/4-6).

Let me ask you to ponder – just for a few seconds – upon the question: why and when do the oppressed need to pray to Allah? They do so in an unjust, unfair and oppressive society which is oblivious to their predicament, abandons

Why pray?

them by neglecting them completely. They see no other recourse

open to them than to plead with the Almighty. But  this never  happens  in a fair

Not so in a Just Society

and just society, simply because they do not need

to. This  fact  was so very  eloquently  illustrated by Omar,  the second  Caliph,

Omar’s Eloquent Statement

when he announced:

“I have been entrusted with the responsibility of the Caliphate so that I stop your prayers on their way out and not let them reach Allah!”

that sums up the purpose and target of the Quranic social order.

In such a society, no one needs to pray to the Almighty because His representatives on Earth are taking care of them. In such a society there are no individual prayers. That  explains the fact that all the Muslim prayers mentioned

Muslim Prayers are Collective

in  the  Quran  are  collective.  A glance  at

those can make clear their purpose. Some of them are:

1.    O Preserver of all worlds! Guide us on the right path, the course of those blessed by You!        (1/5-7)

2.    O our Sustainer! Bestow nice things on us Here as well as in the Hereafter.                (2/201)

3.    O our Sustainer! Give us steadfastness so that we don’t falter. Save us from the consequences of small errors. Give us triumph over the enemy.        (3/146-147)

4.    O our Sustainer! Ignore our errors and forgetfulness. Don’t let us slip back into ignorance like nations of the past. Give us strength to carry out our responsibilities. Give us triumph over those who oppose Your system.      (2/286); (3/15)

5.        O our Preserver! Don’t let us go astray now that we are on the right path. Please keep us provided for.  (3/7)

6.        O our Sustainer! Keep the promises you have made to us through your messengers.            (3/192-193)

7.        Let us be among the doers of good deeds (5/83). Not among the transgressors    (7/47)

8.        Let the Right decide the conflict between us and our opponents. (7/89)

9.        O Allah! Save us from the oppressors.    (10/85)

10.   Prayers to be saved from the punishment in Hell.   (25/65)

11.   Let our families (wife and children) be the cause of happiness; let us be the leaders among law-abiders.  (25/74)

12.   O our Sustainer! Take us, as well as our brethren gone before us with conviction, under Your protective fold. O Allah! Keep our hearts free of malice for our brothers.         (59/10)

13.   (Muslims praying in Heaven to) Complete our light.    (66/8)

It is time now to consider the most important question one may ask at this point: Granted that prayers are collective, what do they achieve? This, being a pivotal question, needs careful consideration.


Human action springs from desire. Desire, and the subsequent will, directly influence an action and its performance.  It prepares one psychologically for the

What Prayer Achieves

forthcoming  action.  The  verbalization  of  desire is

prayer. As Iqbal very aptly put it in one of his poems for children:

My desire is on my lips as prayer

Be my life as a candle fairer

Psychological  change  in a  person, and  for  that  matter,  in  a nation, has far-

Psychological Change

reaching  effects.  One  can  only  wonder  at  the

linguistic depth the pre-Islamic Arabic had reached. The simple nomads of the ‘jahiliya’ (Ignorance) period used to milk their animals but not quite, leaving a little in there to induce down more. That little amount of milk left was called (الداعية) (the caller; the prayer). This illustrates prayer in the human context, i.e., the condition which spurs emotions into action for subsequent performance. Expression of ones desire is prayer.

It is important to consider two fundamental points regarding desire.

First, the nature of desire. The Quran suggests the standard of a Muslim’s desire as: “and don’t desire but what Allah wants” — (81/29), i.e., abide by His laws and follow His system. As mentioned earlier, the sole purpose of human endeavor  is to develop one’s  personality.  The  standard  to  measure

Keep your desires in line with Allah’s Will

this development is to see

how much of ‘Allahness’ is reflected in one’s personality. Of course, one kind of divine attributes are beyond humans (e.g., eternity and immortality). But humans can develop in themselves the godly attributes of benevolence, sustenance, kindness, etc.  This depends upon having a desire to develop such attributes. So, men should desire what Allah wants them to, which can be found in His Revelation (the Quran), without which: “Man instead of praying for good, prays for bad, in his haste” – (17/11).

Second, the objective of a desire must always be kept in view. The Quran says the Convinced “Keep in view Allah’s law standing, sitting, and lying” –  (3/191).  Again,  in  Sura  Ha’Meem:  “Those who say,  ‘Allah  is our

What is Remembering Allah

preserver’ , and  then  stand firm, they have

angels descending upon them to console and comfort them with their support Here and in the Hereafter, and give them glad tidings of Paradise promised to them. There (in Paradise) you will get what you wish and will happen what you pray for” — (41/30-31). A Muslim, by definition, does not desire (pray) for anything out of line with Allah’s Will. That, therefore, guarantees answering of the Momeneen’s (the Convinced) prayers.

Regarding the ‘help by angels’, the Quran has clearly called it ‘psychological satisfaction’ (8/10) resulting in steadfastness – (8/11).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

As  far  as  praying  for someone else is concerned, it is nothing but the

Prayer for Others

expression  of  one’s  good  wishes.  It  acts  as moral

support for others. One such case in point is the practice of praying for the dead (who of course remain unaffected) which is a solace to the bereaved. Such acts are socially desirable to promote gregariousness. That is why the Messenger was told to appreciate and felicitate those who bring in their donations because “Your prayer is satisfying for them” – (9/103).


The  Quran  reports some individual prayers of divine messengers. Job

Individual Prayers of Messengers

(Ayyub)  prayed  to  Allah  in  his

predicament and He salvaged him (3/83, 84); Jonah (Younis) called out to Him and his calamity was alleviated (31/87,88). In the first place, the Quran reports not details as to how such help was given. Secondly, and fundamentally, it is impossible for us to fully comprehend the mechanism of divine Revelation and the nature of the Allah – Messenger relationship. Therefore, it is better left at that. The Messenger Mohammed’s individual prayer mentioned in the Quran is ideal for everyone: “Say, ‘O Preserver! Give me knowledge aplenty!’” (20/114).


A commonly held belief is that rejecting the mechanism of prayers makes  one  deny  the  benevolence (رحمة  – traditionally translated as mercy) of

Prayer is Blessing and Denying Blessing is Denying Allah

Alllah, which is denying Allah  and  His powers.   Let   us  see  what  رحمة   (rahma)

really is in the Quranic context. For that, we must recall the concept of ‘tauba’ (repentance) mentioned earlier in this book.

The ancient Judaic jurisprudence had no place for ‘tauba’. Every little error had to be punished. The Hindu concept of ‘Karam yoge’ (reincarnation) held a similar position. The Christians believe in ‘the original sin’; Christ went to the cross to absolve Man of sins; anyone believing in the Christ’s being the Savior, gets salvation; that is the basis of the ‘God is Mercy’ belief.

The Quran holds a view different from both of the above. Allah’s Law of


Returns  contains both  justice and clemency,  the latter having a

concept different from the Christian. The Quranic concept of clemency may be illustrated by the example of a person putting his / her hand in a flame. The burning which results naturally in pain is justice. At the same time, Nature has created cure and treatment of burns. That is Allah’s clemency (rahma). This fact can be useful only to those who know and utilize it. This, in the Quranic sense, is tauba (repentance), i.e., efforts to rectify a mistake. This point is aptly illustrated in the figurative story of Man’s creation. Both Man and the Devil erred but whereas Man repented and was willing to rectify his error, the Devil refused to confess, standing defiant. Nature (Allah) was clement to Man but not to the Devil.

The Quran elaborates it in Sura AzZumr: “Say (O My Messenger) to those who have done wrong to themselves, ‘Don’t lose hope of Allah’s clemency. Verily, He has created means of recovering all falterings. He certainly is the Protector and Clement!’ Come back to your Preserver and submit to Him before your error bears result, after which no one will be able to come to your aid” — (39/53-55). Elsewhere,  it is clarified thus: “When they, who are convinced of Our laws, come to you (My Messenger), say to them: ‘Peace be upon you as your Preserver has bound upon Himself to be clement, i.e., anyone of you who unknowingly falters, then repents and rectifies it, shall find Allah protecting and clement’” — (6/54).

This is not to be taken as a license to commit wrongs. It says: “This is how your Preserver shall be clement to you. But if you return (to your ways), Our system ( of punishment) shall return to you. – (17/8).

Tauba (repentance), therefore, is only for those who are convinced of the natural Law of Returns. The disbelievers, on the other hand, have been said to be hopeless of divine clemency. Sura Ankaboot says: “Those who reject Allah’s Law and its Principle of Returns, are the ones hopeless of My clemency” — (29/23).

Elsewhere, the Quran says: “That who loses faith in his Preserver’s clemency, has surely lost his way” — (15/56). Contrary to this: “Verily, those who are convinced and abandon (everything for Allah) and struggle in Allah’s way, seek Allah’s clemency. Certainly, Allah is Protector and Clement” — (2/218). Allah’s clemency (rahma), therefore, is for those who strive. Says the Quran:

“Even among the Convinced, the lethargic – save the invalid – can never be at par with those who strive with their selves and wealth in the way of Allah. He holds the strugglers in a higher status than those who shirk action. The system benefits all but the endeavoring are graded higher than the passive ones – Higher status and protection and clemency. Certainly, Allah is Protector and Clement.”     (4/95-96)

Finally, consider Sura Al’Araaf where Moses prayed for His blessing for Israelites and got this reply: “Surely, My clemency encompasses everything. But among men, only those merit it who abide by His laws, work for universal sustenance of mankind, are convinced of the validity of Our laws, and follow the illiterate Messenger in the future, who they find mentioned in the Torah and the Bible – he will promote good and forbid wrong, allow nice things and disallow bad, break their unnatural yoke of slavery, lighten them by relieving them of slabs. That is the only way to obtain Allah’s clemency, covering the entire universe in its benevolent clouds!”  (7/156-157).

Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (Book of Destiny)

translated by Khalid M. Sayyed


The Universe, and everything in it, was created with its characteristics pre-determined  and its behavior intrinsically  programmed in it by Nature.  Life,

The Inanimate, Plants & Animals

going  through  its  evolutionary  phases

from  the  simplest  to  the  most  complex,  was  no  different  till it  reached the


human form.  This  was  different  from all  previous  creation. Sura

Momenoon: “We started creation of Man from essence of clay (inanimate matter) gradually taking it to sexual procreation. Thus We made his semen which impregnated the womb and came to stay in the female egg; then changed the semen into a leech-like from, which later transformed into a meat-like piece; then arose a skeleton within it which We covered with flesh. Then We made him into a creation of another kind!” — (23/12-14). The attribute setting this new creation apart from the rest of the previous was ‘Divine Energy’ — “and He blew into him from His energy and made for you (powers of) hearing and sight and thought” – (32/9). This deviation from the hitherto normal was done for a purpose: “Then We gave him hearing and sight; guided him onto the path to accept or reject it “ — (76/2-3). Elsewhere: “We guided him to two paths” – (90/10). This testifies to the faculty of choice Man enjoys as compared to the rest of the Universe. Previously, only Allah had the power of choice. Now, Man was created in His image. Man’s faculty of freedom of choice is the  colorful  thread  running  through  the  fabric of the Universe. This

Manifestations of Freedom of Choice

has been allegorically illustrated  in

the  Story of  Man’s creation where Man chooses to abide by laws of Nature of his own accord. It is creditable to him simple because he could have refused. A forced action, with no alternative, carries no merit. This new ‘free’ creature was told: “and He has rendered harnessable for you all whatever there is in the Earth and in the skies” — (45/13). The modern age of science and technology is living testimony of this human attribute, i.e., to harness nature. Science functions on the firm basis of the laws of nature being consistent. The Quran refers to these laws as Allah’s will; the Universe is functioning under His will (laws of nature) and it is called its taqdeer (destiny).

As regards Man, his existence has two aspects. One: physical existence where he is similar to animals; two: human life where he should follow a code of law referred to as ‘permanent values’, given to him through divine revelation and meant to develop his ‘personality’.

Harnessing  the  forces  of  nature  is  a human  attribute; keeping them

The Status of the Convinced

within  the  confines of the divine permanent-

value system is a humane (mo’min) attribute. This causes Man’s potential capabilities to manifest to incredible heights. The Quran refers to such men as ‘the elevated’ — (3/138). This ambition to rise up was the driving force behind the phenomenal success of early Muslims. The selfish and the greedy exploiters of men, alarmed by the situation, got to work against it. They knew it very clearly that it is the Quran which  taught  them to be   the   masters of  their

Revenge on the Momeneen

own fate. The Muslims had to be dissuaded

from the idea that Man can shape his own destiny. Therefore, their adversaries and opponents began – according to a well thought-out conspiracy — to propagate the age-old belief of Magus of pre-decided destiny of Man. To start with, philosophical discussions on freedom of choice were initiated. Later, the concept of pre-destiny was cloaked in the sacredly religious garb of fabricated tradition of Mohammed. This era saw the appearance of the first-ever commentary of the Quran as well as the very first account of history (both by Tabri). Both the works were based upon oral tradition attributed to the Messenger through his companions. Collections of these traditions were compiled into book from around the same time. With the passage of time, the idea  of  pre-destiny of  Man  attained  the   sanctity  of  a  religious dogma and,

Propagation of Pre- destiny

subsequently, an  article  of  faith.  The  idea

spread the notion that dominance and subjugation, status, wealth, happiness and tragedy, success and failure, etc. are all directly controlled by Allah. No human effort can alter individual or collective destiny pre-decided by Him. Therefore, one should be content with whatever state one is in. The oppressor, the cruel, the tyrant, the exploiter are all but pawns in the great divine universal plan and so should not be blamed or complained against that is actually insolence to Allah Himself!

All this development took place during the monarchical period of Muslim history – very obviously, such concepts are very well suited to the motives and purposes of autocratic rulers. In addition to that, kingship and priesthood always have gone, and still, go hand in hand for their mutual benefit, i.e., to rule the populace. Thus, the religious support for such concepts was readily available. The whole idea was reinforced by the concept of mysticism which is really based upon indifference to the practical world and being in an eccentric domain of its own. The inactivity thus bred soon took life out of the Muslim nation. They began believing in the non-Quranic, un-Islamic ideology of contentment wit their lot. The state of affairs has been there for almost a millenium. Consequently, Muslims, the shapers of the world’s destiny, have been reduced to a lethargic,  inactive, unscientific-minded group  of  believers in their

The Duality

pre-decided destiny.  But,  tragically,  Muslims  today  are  torn

between the idea of pre-destiny and practices to change it. The paradoxical behavior is evident in cases like illness, murder, etc. where all efforts are employed  to  change  the course of events.  At  the same time,  strong belief in

The Psychological Dilemma

pre-destiny   is   verbally   expressed!

Consequently, this split psychology renders people half-hearted and ineffective in their actions. A shaky hand always misses the target!

The correct way is for the Muslims in particular, and mankind in general,

The Correct Way

to examine their ideology in the light of the living Book

of Allah – the Quran. They should retain what the Book condones. All other notions should be discarded. The focal point of the Quran is the Law of Returns — every human action bears a result, sooner or later. That makes Man responsible for his actions. Otherwise, the entire system of divine guidance is rendered pointless.

Furthermore, the idea of pre-destiny also makes a mockery of our judicial machinery. Why punish a criminal when he / she only was an instrument in the grand divine plan of things pre-decided at the birth of the Universe?

The same difficulty arises in the case of morality, too! I hope by now it is quite clear that the traditional notion of Man’s (or a man’s) pre-decided destiny does not hold any ground whatsoever. All human social problems are of their own making (42/30); and only they themselves can solve them as they are fully capable of and responsible for doing it.

From some quarters, an objection is raised to the idea of Man being the

An Objection

master of his own destiny. It is said that this contradicts with

the omnipotence of Allah. But this objection is superficial. It would hold good if Allah’s authority was restricted by someone other than Himself, but not if He does it of His Own accord. In fact, it substantiates His potency when He formulates laws with the rule that those laws are unchangeable (10/64). He has Himself restricted His powers.

Some present  an even  flimsier  objection in  that  emphasis  on divine

Law in Nothing but Standing Orders

laws  excludes  the  person  of Allah.

The frivolousness of this argument is quite clear. Allah made some laws through issuing orders which stand for all time. By obeying His laws Man is actually obeying Allah.

Some object  on  my  use of  terms  like Allah’s law instead of Allah’s

Order and Law

will  or  Allah’s orders  (instructions).  True, words are not

essential, actions are. But when certain terms tend to alter the real meaning originally intended, words do become important. Terms like ‘order’, ‘instructions’, etc. give the impression of being changeable, but ‘law’ comes out as permanent. Furthermore, obeying orders can be mechanical but following a law is with full awareness and conviction. A law can be tested for its validity by the results it claims to produce. This is exactly what the Quran has done when it says that ‘kitab’ (law) and ‘hikma’ (its purpose) are both from Allah.  Therefore,  every  action  can  be  seen  to  be  according  to  the  law or

Action and Result

otherwise from the result it does or does not  bear.  One

example is the establishment of the prayer system. The Quran claims: “Surely, ‘sala’ is to eradicate the obscene and the forbidden” —- (29/45). It is common knowledge that it has not done that during all these centuries of Muslim history (except for a brief initial period). My view is that there is something wrong or lacking in the current idea and / or practice of ‘sala’. The Quran’s claim is not wrong. We (the Muslims) are.

That is but one example. The Quran presents all its laws with their purposes stated. They should be followed with periodic check whether the relevant purposes are being met (the claimed results produced).

That, then, is the essential difference between ‘mazhab’ (religion) and ‘deen’ (The Quranic System). The former requires mechanical carrying out of orders (rituals) whereas the latter requires following laws with full awareness and responsibility. That, in other words, is taqdeer (destiny), i.e., obeying Allah’s law out of choice!

This entry was posted in FREE WILL & PREDESTINATION. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s